Testifying before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, Aimee Arrambide, the executive director of the abortion rights nonprofit Avow Texas, told a Republican lawmaker she believes men can become pregnant and have abortions. The hearing was entitled, “Revoking your Rights.”
North Carolina Rep. Dan Bishop, a Republican, asked Arrambide, “What do you say a woman is?”
She replied: “I believe that everyone can identify for themselves.”
Next Bishop asked her, “Do you believe that men can become pregnant and have abortions?”
“Yes,” she answered.
Q: “Do you believe that men can become pregnant and have abortions?” –@RepDanBishop
A: “Yes.” -Democrat witness pic.twitter.com/TfxboajSJU
— House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP) May 18, 2022
Arrambide distinguished herself again in questioning from Republican Rep. Mike Johnson of Louisiana who asked her what the difference was between a baby just before it’s born and a two-year-old child.
After establishing that she supports abortion at any stage of pregnancy, Johnson asked, “If it is not lawful and morally acceptable to take the life of a ten-year-old child, I assume you agree with that, right – that would be wrong – correct?”
“And a two-year-old child, the same thing, that would be murder. We would all agree that’s wrong. Then what is the principal distinction between the human being that is two years old or nine months old or one week old or an hour old and one that is eight inches further up the birth canal in the utero? What is the difference? Why is it okay in the latter case and not in the former cases?”
The activist pauses for a couple of seconds, then tells him, “I trust people to determine what to do with their own bodies.”
“Wow,” Johnson responds.
Arrambide smirks. She adds, “Full stop.”
Can’t get over this clip of @RepMikeJohnson leaving an abortion advocate absolutely speechless by simply asking for the distinction between a baby just before it’s born and when it is 2 years old. pic.twitter.com/13yy4qQV7B
— Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) May 18, 2022
The problem is that this woman’s responses, ludicrous as they are, are now considered reasonable within the Democratic Party. The definition of a woman is anything you want it to be, men can get pregnant, and abortion is okay at any stage of pregnancy, up to the moment of birth, or even after if the doctor and mother agree it’s the right thing to do.
Unfortunately for the Democrats, most Americans consider a female is “an individual of the sex that bears young” or “that produces ova or eggs” and has two X chromosomes, that men cannot become pregnant and that there ought to be limitations on abortion.
Arrambide’s dumbfounding testimony demands that every Democratic candidate this fall, whether they’re running for dog catcher or a seat in the U.S. Senate, be asked the following three questions which will force them to choose between common sense and progressive orthodoxy.
- What is a woman?
- Can men become pregnant?
- Do you believe there should be any restrictions on abortion?
Their answers will tell us all we need to know.
A previous version of this article was published on The Western Journal.
Follow AFNN:
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA
Please follow me on LinkedIn or Twitter
Why didn’t someone warn me, years ago, that I could have become pregnant, a sorrowful single father….. all that risk I never knew I was taking…. just think of what could have happened to my youth, my beauty, my value score in the dating world…. /s
Can the progressive left become more stupid or less self-aware than they are currently?
What Democrats haven’t figured out, past using propaganda lies, is that the vast majority of the American people know this stuff isn’t true, and brush it aside. Some even still vote for Democrats, but I bet there are fewer of those, nowadays, once they have been enlightened to the nonsense. That doesn’t mean they will vote Republican, but it does mean the fishbowl the Democrats have, with fish swimming around has gotten smaller.
This is just abortion. They have several other areas where they can stand out as stupid and irrational. This is just going to be the one that makes them look the most foolish.
They had to destroy science to do this, and to inject global warming into everyday life, as being factual, when a fact has nothing to do with either.
Homosexuals should have never been allowed to marry. While homosexuals all aren’t radicals, the ones who are, are who throw this garbage into the mainstream, with the aid of the Democrats. They were given their inch, and now look where we are.
It won’t stop until we put a stop to it.
If there are ANY DemoKrats left in Congress after the November mid terms, that would mean there are plenty of stupid voters still left in our Republic to endanger the rest of us normal Americans.
Sadly, there are just too many places where the cancer has metastasized. You’d have to find some way to force population caps on the major metros and create a diaspora… then keep them from gathering in new places in enough numbers to flip the swing districts.
“Only two things in Creation are limitless, the Universe and human stupidity–and I’m not sure about the former.”
–Albert Einstein
LOL. Einstein was truly a genius.
Every bird, every reptile, and every mammal can tell the differences between males and females of their own species. Only human liberals have managed to educate this ability out of themselves.
“Full Stop”
Well, I guess she told him. Shows just how stupid that person is, since she probably will say she is a man, tomorrow, because she doesn’t want to confuse any of her peers about a label. Fluid drained from my transmission looks cleaner than what comes from her mouth.