The Oath

In Civics we learned the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. But Joe seems determined to make it a “living” document subject to his interpretation The Oath of Office for the President is in Article 2, Sec 1, of that founding document. It reads: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” The portion I am concerned with is, “…preserve, protect and defend…”

So has Joe made a strong effort to uphold that oath? I for one think not. I’ll cite here what I feel are the two most egregious examples: first, the uncontrolled Southern (and now the Northern) Border and second, the riot that occurred on January 6, 2021.

From the Southern Border which Joe has opened to cartels, over 2 million known illegal migrants, human trafficking, and untold amounts of fentanyl poison, to spending $130,000/day storing the unused building materials for the Wall (www.westernjournal.com), he has intentionally put Americans in jeopardy. As many have written, the scale of illegal migrants has not only placed a great stress on the border towns but is now being felt by cities nationwide. Where and how does it end? What is the plan other than to have no plan? And we know the flood of migrants is out of control when even Democrats clamor for action. Except those dolts who skipped the Congressional hearing. (www.dailysignal.com, 3/15)

Second, January 6. Some call it an insurrection. But was it? After the Tucker Tapes it could indeed be called a riot spurred on by a few who chose to make it one. If there was proof of an “insurrection” people would be tried and convicted already. Those who assaulted Capitol Police or destroyed property should be tried immediately. Just as police who used excessive force on civilians—to include murdering one if not two that day–should be tried or disciplined. But wasting the court’s time on people who simply wandered around non-violently and left when they were asked? Surely the FBI and DOJ have more to do.

And another question, why did the government withhold the surveillance tapes from the Jan 6 prisoners and their attorneys? A 1963 SCOTUS ruling makes this illegal (Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83). So how is Joe upholding federal law and defending the Constitution’s Sixth Amendment relative to those prisoners held a year or more in the DC Gulag? Is he taking the word of the January 6 Select Committee? Chairman Thompson admitted that no Committee member watched the 40,000 hours of tapes or a portion thereof. Only their staff. That gives me a warm fuzzy. (www.thepostmillennial.com,3/9) So how do they actually know what happened? You’re right, they don’t. And I’m seeing what I never thought to see in my country, apparent political persecution.

Joe Biden, the leader of America, now turns his back on those who founded it for political posturing. I do not understand what his true intentions are. And I fear he doesn’t either, wandering from here to there, whispering and yelling, with a vacant look and no apparent plan. If he used the Constitution he might find one. But perhaps I give him too much credit

If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us

Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
Parler: https://parler.com/AFNNUSA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA