Update: Missouri v Biden Censorship Lawsuit

Judge Doughty DENIES Biden admin lawyers’ motion to stay the Preliminary Injunction ruling

On July 6th, the defendants submitted a motion to stay the preliminary injunction, which was a result of the ruling on the 4th of July. This ruling forces the defendants in the lawsuit to stop communications with Big Tech Platforms that would further undermine American’s 1st Amendment rights. The defendants also appealed the ruling in a document which was submitted prior to the motion to stay.

On July 8th, the plaintiffs responded to the request to stay the injunction, which was a 17 page response that suggested:

  1. The Injunction Is Not Vague and Imposes No Cognizable Injury on Defendants.
  2. Staying the Injunction Would Inflict Irreparable Injury on Plaintiffs.
  3. The defendants are unlikely to succeed on merits.
  4. The Court Should Again Reject Defendants’ Request for an Administrative Stay.

On the 10th of July, Judge Terry Doughty who presides over the Missouri V Biden case, denied the request to stay the preliminary injunction ruling granted on the 4th of July. Judge Doughty also clarified the definition of “protected free speech.”

“Protected free speech” means speech which is protected by the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution in accordance with the jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court.

If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.

Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA

 

Leave a Comment