Addressing America’s Debt Crisis: The Case for Defunding the UN and saving $12 billion Annually


The United States is facing an unprecedented debt crisis, with the national debt surpassing $33 trillion. In these dire fiscal times, it’s essential to consider every possible avenue to cut costs and regain control of our financial future. One such avenue is reevaluating our funding for the United Nations (UN). In 2023 we will have donated $12 billion taxpayer dollars to this astute body.  This article delves into the various criticisms of the UN and argues that defunding this international organization could provide significant financial relief.

**The UN’s Effectiveness:**

One of the primary criticisms of the UN is its perceived ineffectiveness in addressing global issues. From slow decision-making processes to difficulties enforcing resolutions, the UN’s track record is far from perfect.

**Unequal Power Structure:**

The unequal power structure within the UN Security Council, where a select few nations wield veto power, has been a long-standing issue. Critics argue that this system does not adequately represent the world’s current power dynamics.

**Bureaucracy and Inefficiency:**

The UN’s bureaucracy is often criticized for its inefficiency and wasteful spending. Calls for streamlining its operations have fallen on deaf ears, leaving room for improved cost management.

**Lack of Enforcement Mechanisms:**

The UN’s ability to enforce its decisions is questioned. In many instances, member states fail to comply with UN resolutions without facing consequences.

**Resource Allocation and Funding Disparities:**

The allocation of resources and funding within the UN can be seen as questionable, with administrative costs sometimes diverting much-needed funding from humanitarian and development initiatives.

**Political Bias:**

The UN has faced accusations of political bias, particularly in relation to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, raising concerns about its impartiality.

**Human Rights Concerns:**

Critics have raised concerns about UN member states with questionable human rights records occupying prominent roles within UN bodies, which can undermine the organization’s credibility.

**The Path Forward:**

In times of financial crisis, we must prioritize our nation’s fiscal health. While the UN serves essential purposes, its inefficiencies and shortcomings cannot be ignored. Reallocating or reducing our contributions to the UN can serve as a significant cost-cutting measure, freeing up resources to address pressing domestic issues and mitigate our mounting debt.


Addressing America’s astronomical debt is not just a matter of economic prudence; it’s a moral imperative. Imagine what we could buy with $13 billion a year in savings. By reevaluating our commitment to the UN and considering the criticisms that have been voiced, we can take a step toward securing our financial future and ensuring that our resources are directed where they are needed most. It’s time to put America’s fiscal well-being first and make the tough decisions that will benefit our nation and its citizens in the long run.

If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at Help keep us ad-free by donating here.

Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA

Leave a Comment