In George Orwell’s “Animal Farm,” the animals’ uprising against human oppression led to a new order, but ultimately, the pigs became akin to the former human masters. This allegory holds a mirror to societal structures, prompting reflections on power dynamics and complacency. Similarly, speculations about a second civil war in the USA often overlook a crucial aspect: the intricate relationship between the governed and the government, likened here to a farmer and farm animals.
Over the years, the government has expanded its role in citizens’ lives through an array of programs—welfare, social security, military pensions, disability payments, stimulus checks, and tax refunds. This exponential growth in government intervention has transformed the citizens into reliant entities within the metaphorical farm. A hypothetical “reboot” of the government would mean sacrificing these crucial support systems, akin to snatching away the farm animals’ sustenance.
The analogy draws a stark picture: when the government controls the “money supply,” akin to the farmer controlling food in the barn, individuals are inclined to comply with its demands to ensure their sustenance. The fear of losing these essential benefits keeps the farm animals, in this case, the citizens, from biting the hand that feeds them, creating a cycle of compliance and dependency.
The prospect of revolting against the established order, despite any grievances or dissatisfaction, becomes increasingly improbable. The fear of losing the comforts and necessities provided by the system—be it social security, welfare, or other governmental aids—acts as a powerful deterrent against any substantial movement that could potentially disrupt the status quo.
While discontent may simmer beneath the surface, the comfort and stability offered within the farm’s confines deter the majority from actively seeking radical change. The fear of upheaval and uncertainty restrains citizens from challenging the established system, despite any grievances or the potential for change.
In conclusion, the notion of a second civil war in the USA remains highly improbable due to the intricacies of dependence on government programs. The entwined relationship between the governed and the government, resembling the farmer and farm animals, underscores a crucial reality: the fear of losing essential support systems inhibits large-scale revolts or drastic changes. The cycle of compliance, driven by the fear of losing the comforts provided by the government, effectively suppresses any widespread uprising, perpetuating a status quo that, for many, offers a semblance of stability and security of a comfy life on the farm. Mooo….
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA
David, I’m a big fan of the dystopian novels. I think they must be required reading for all. Interesting…if I was to lose my Social Security & my pension my life would be really in upheaval, I never thought of it that way. I just had another thought: 50% of the population have no idea ( or care) what we are talking about… AKA Biden supporters.👺