The telecommunications landscape underwent a seismic shift in 1984 with the breakup of the Bell System, a move aimed at introducing competition and curbing monopolistic practices. However, this landmark legislation did not anticipate the rapid emergence and proliferation of cell phones, which would fundamentally alter the industry’s dynamics.
The regulatory focus post-1984 was primarily on landline services and local phone networks, overlooking the nascent mobile communications sector. As cell phones gained popularity and technological advancements accelerated, the regulatory framework struggled to adapt to these new realities.
The result was a situation where traditional landline services faced increased competition and regulatory scrutiny, while the cellular market expanded with limited oversight. This asymmetry allowed some telecommunications companies to dominate both landline and mobile services, leading to concerns about de facto monopolies in certain regions.
Furthermore, the convergence of telecommunications, media, and technology blurred the lines between different sectors, challenging regulators to keep pace with rapid changes. The traditional distinctions between local, long-distance, and wireless services became increasingly obsolete in an interconnected digital age.
Ironically, the year 1984 not only marked a pivotal moment in telecommunications regulation but also evoked the title of George Orwell’s dystopian novel, “1984,” which warned of oppressive government control and surveillance. The unintended irony lies in how the regulatory landscape, intended to foster competition and protect consumers, has at times resulted in concentration of power reminiscent of the novel’s themes, albeit in the corporate realm. This serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of regulating rapidly evolving industries and the need for continual adaptation to avoid unintended consequences.
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA
A few years back, I read an excellent book called “The Political Spectrum,” on how the FCC had screwed up allocation of the digital spectrum over the years. The first mobile phone was not used in 1973, but 1948. Had this company been allowed to begin, can you imagine how cell phones could’ve developed with those extra years?
One stat I remember, because I had to reread it like six times. In 1999 long distance telecommunication services was a half trillion dollar industry. By 2004, it had dropped to 50 billion. 90% of its market share was gone, because people, used cell phones with long distance included in the plan, or voiceover services took care of the long-distance services.
The overall point of this book was let people have sections of the spectrum and they will make money at it, government supervision not needed.
I might really appreciate a pay phone on the wall in my house. Just think at how simple life might be, absent of everything at the touch of a cellphone. Yeh, technology is great, but… just look at all the pitfalls power and control has gotten us in all the garbage we find on the internet on our “awesome” cellphones.
Orwell did warn us how technology and control would merge with another, didn’t he?