The precise date of Jesus Christ’s birth has long been a matter of debate among scholars, historians, and theologians. However, compelling evidence suggests that September 11, 3 BC, may mark the true date of His birth. This assertion, grounded in historical, biblical, and astronomical data, challenges traditional assumptions and offers a thought-provoking alternative supported by remarkable alignments of celestial phenomena, historical records, and biblical symbolism.
One of the most persuasive pieces of evidence comes from astronomy. The “Star of Bethlehem,” described in Matthew 2, has baffled historians for centuries. Modern astronomical research suggests that a conjunction of Jupiter and Regulus in the constellation Leo occurred around September 11, 3 BC. This event symbolizes the birth of a king in Jewish tradition, aligning with the prophecy of a Messiah born in David’s lineage. Additionally, Revelation 12 describes a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet—a rare celestial alignment that also occurred on this date in 3 BC, further corroborating the biblical narrative.
Historical data also supports this conclusion. Herod the Great’s death is often cited as a reference point for Jesus’s birth, traditionally dated to 4 BC. However, some scholars argue that Herod died in 1 BC, supported by a lunar eclipse mentioned by Josephus. This timeline aligns Jesus’s birth with 3 or 2 BC. Furthermore, Luke’s mention of a Roman census during the time of Quirinius fits better with this revised chronology, as localized censuses were known to occur around that time.
Biblical chronology provides additional reinforcement. The Gospel of Luke links Jesus’s birth to the priestly rotation of Zechariah, father of John the Baptist. Scholars estimate Zechariah served in the temple around mid-June, with John’s birth following in late March. Six months later, Mary conceived Jesus, placing His birth nine months after that, in early to mid-September. The alignment with Rosh Hashanah, a Jewish festival symbolizing kingship and renewal, adds further weight to the argument.
Finally, the theological and symbolic significance of September 11 as Jesus’s birth date cannot be ignored. On this date in 3 BC, the Hebrew calendar marked Tishri 1, the Jewish New Year. This day’s associations with kingship, new beginnings, and the divine coronation of rulers align perfectly with the birth of Christ, the King of Kings. By revisiting this evidence, we gain a richer understanding of the nativity and its profound implications. While traditional December celebrations remain significant, recognizing the plausibility of a September birth enriches the historical and spiritual context of Jesus’s life.
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA