John Parillo on: Federalist 46 to 48
On Resisting the Federal Government and the Separation of Powers
Citizen Writers Fighting Censorship by Helping Americans Understand Issues Affecting the Republic.
On Resisting the Federal Government and the Separation of Powers
The latest tyranny in Blue Washington State: A new law destroying Americans’ constitutional right to vote for their county sheriffs, was just slapped down by a judge.
In Federalist 38 Madison discusses the process by which the new proposed constitution was written and how that process was superior to anything that had been attempted before in history.
“There are strong minds in every walk of life that will rise superior to the disadvantages of situation, and will command the tribute due to their merit, not only from the classes to which they particularly belong, but from the society in general.”
The title of this piece is a bold statement, and the SAVE act is proof that it’s true.
Having just thrown off one despot, the Framers were loath to replace him with another, even one of their own making
Hamilton once again delves into power of the States vis a vis the Federal Government and outlines the importance of the militia.
Hamilton goes on in Federalist 26 to talk about the reasons why a national military is needed and how the legislature provides a check on this power.
The idea of a professional soldier would have been foreign to the colonists and a subject of concern. To this day, the funding for our military must be re-authorized every two years.
I have never believed the leftist maxim that insists diversity is “our strength.” Instead, I see it as divisive, with our nation being split into cultural, ethnic, racial, religious, and political tribes who are essentially at war with one another.
Emergencies are often used by authoritarian governments to bend, if not outright flout the rules. Federalist 20 & 21 address this issue.
America is witnessing an internal insurrection and subversion from the enemy within. We must stop calling what we see “politics,” for it is not, it is a blood sport for absolute power…The Democrat party does not want a country of laws, it wants a dictatorship, hence it continues to project exactly what they are doing on others so that their sheep, the useful idiots, their indoctrinated masses who protest “no kings” will continue to do their dirty work for them.
In his examination of Federalist 17-19, John Parillo looks at the discussion of balance between individual and state liberties vs Federal Powers.
Gun grabbers argue that limiting civilian access to firearms is necessary for public safety, but history has shown us the dangers of disarming the population.
On why the Framers determined that our President should not and would not be a King
Elections still happen. Parties still act like it’s a steel-cage match. But on the fundamentals—the wiring of the economy, the growth of the administrative state, the handshake between government and corporate power—the menu is pre-selected. You’re not choosing dinner; you’re choosing the garnish. The work of Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page (2014) didn’t need conspiracy theories to make the point: policy outcomes tend to track the preferences of economic elites far more than average voters. Translation: your vote counts; your leverage doesn’t.
John Parillo examines Federalist 12-15, where Hamilton and Madison once again return to limited government and great personal liberty.
Democrats rely on “racism” like a crack addict needing a fix. The SPLC is just one source of perceived prejudice.
The oath military officers take in these United States, is different than that taken by officers in other countries. American officers swear to an ideal, not a tyrant.
In recent years, the United States has witnessed growing erosion of capitalism and the fundamental liberties enshrined in the nation’s founding principles.