Living Behind Enemy Lines, Tale #100: Diane Needs Your Tales Of Surviving On Blue Turf

Living Behind Enemy Lines, Tale #100: Diane Needs Your Tales Of Surviving On Blue Turf

Subscribers love my “Living Behind Enemy Lines” articles. I need more! I won’t use your name. It can be a short story about one aspect of living on Blue turf, or a longer essay: A story about an abuse you have suffered because you are a Trumpster, or a light-hearted tale.

‘Communion’ by J D Vance

I will admit that it’s truly baffling to me that the northeast, the most politically liberal area of our country, is also our most heavily Catholic region, yet our good friends on the left love to spend their time bashing Catholics. It kind of makes me wonder just how actually Catholic they are. Our 46th …

Read more

Living Behind Enemy Lines, Tale #99: When Libs Take Over A Club, They Ruin The Fun, Chase Away Conservatives

Living Behind Enemy Lines, Tale #99: When Libs Take Over A Club, They Ruin The Fun, Chase Away Conservatives

Since January 2025 the Liberal members of this club have become increasingly nasty. To curb this behavior, the new office manager recently started sending out “codes of conduct” messages with each weekly email Blast such as: “Please be Kind,” “Be Respectful,” and “Be Helpful.”

Gill at the grill: He’s barbecuing communists in Congress and I love it

Congressman Brandon Gill does not look like a Texan. At 32, he looks like an investment banker and hedge fund analyst from the Ivy League, which he was until he ran for Congress in 2024 with the blessing of President Trump to succeed a retiring Republican.

But boy can the young man in the black suit grill.

Democrats don’t vet: Woman who called Epstein “Uncle Jeffrey” screened Obama’s Cabinet appointees

As the Saga of Oystergruppenfuhrer Graham Platner continues in Maine, the focus turns to the vetting process used by the Democrat Central Committee included a panel of experts with white-tipped canes. The verdict is in: They would run a Nazi just to get a Senate seat.

Democrats have given a pass to unfit candidates for decades.

The Case for a “Choice Election” in 2026: Not a referendum on the Republican Party

The Democrat Party and their legacy media allies are framing the 2026 midterms as a referendum on President Trump and Republican governance in Congress, leveraging historical midterm dynamics where the president’s party often loses seats. Democratic leaders (e.g., Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash, the Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee chairman) explicitly call for making it a referendum on “Trump’s one big beautiful bill and agenda.” Their messaging focuses on affordability, health care costs, farm/economic impacts from policies, and immigration enforcement effects in key districts. They are targeting ostensibly vulnerable GOP seats in Trump-won areas, expanding maps and emphasizing “MAGA extremism” or unfulfilled promises.

Here’s Why the SAVE Act Must Be Passed: An election integrity advocate’s case

American self-governance rests on one indispensable foundation: that elections reflect the will of eligible citizens, counted accurately, administered transparently. Republicans and election integrity advocates argue that this foundation has been progressively undermined — not necessarily by a single grand conspiracy, but by a systemic pattern of loosened safeguards, dirty voter rolls, exploitable mail-ballot systems, and aggressive Democrat opposition to the audits and reforms that would resolve public doubt once and for all.