Citizen Writers Fighting Censorship by Helping Americans Understand Issues Affecting the Republic.
While the idea of small government may be appealing in its simplicity, it misses the mark when it comes to the constitutional vision of governance. The U.S. Constitution does not demand a government that is small; it demands a government that is limited
Former Vice President Dick Cheney (R, WY) has endorsed former Senator Kamala Harris (D, CA) for president this fall.
In an election season when we have much more important things to talk about, why are we wasting column inches – and our readers’ precious time – on a local dispute interesting only to pizza purists?
Because words matter.
The original intent of the U.S. Constitution serves as the secure foundation of the success of our republic, anchoring our legal and governmental systems to the principles envisioned by the framers.
If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may justify any action at all under that aegis.
The U.S. Constitution, the foundation of American law and governance, stands as a testament to the vision and wisdom of the Founding Fathers.
After Hamilton’s introduction to the Judiciary in Federalist 78, he digs a bit deeper into the subject here.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.
To the rabid left, the U.S. Constitution is like that annoying friend who always insists on following the rules.
Federalist 68 describes the Founders’ concerns over choosing our Presidents and the dangers of doing so by “popular vote.”
On this July 4th, I am acknowledging the significance of our founding fathers’ gift to us, while recognizing that it is dying before our eyes.
On the Legitimacy of the New Constitution, and the Very Limited Role of Government
Pretty much everyone except the “fundamental transformation” commies and their Ivy League useful idiots agree that using the law to undermine the Constitution is kind of a bad thing. The question is what to do about it.
When Harry Browne said, “I want a government small enough to fit inside the Constitution,” he spoke for every single patriot in the country alive today — and all of the dead ones.
John Jay still writing as Publius, jumps back into the fray with Federalist 3 arguing that a single country, and a single constitution, would be safer for the citizens than to remain individual states.
The Federalist Papers were written under the pseudonym “Publius,” whose authors had him acting the part of a founder of the Roman Republic. I do not think that was an accident.
May You Be Blessed With The Gift Of Energetic, Stupid, Scheming, Grandstanding Enemies.
There seems to be a rampant and deliberate misinterpretation of Constitutional prohibitions on Government and not to the benefit of. the citizenry.
Not since the Civil War have we been in a more dangerous time in which our differences can turn the US into a post constitutional nation