Citizen Writers Fighting Censorship by Helping Americans Understand Issues Affecting the Republic.
We are consistently being dazzled and dazzled by the depth of nonsense constantly being repeated to us by our news media to the point we no longer hear what’s being said, just agreeing to it.
The court found itself trapped in a constitutional showdown with the president—a situation that can only lead to a trail of tears for the Supreme Court because as President Jackson supposedly said, “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it.”
Democrat Federal District Court Judges and one Trump 45 appointee made about 20 nationwide injunctions against the Trump 47 Administration in his first 63 days. They made 64 during his first term.
Chief Justice John Roberts has his panties in a wad because the president complained about a deep-state judge ignoring the Constitution to the point where the judge demanded that the military turn a couple of planes around in midflight like he was the air traffic controller-in-chief.
Ethics is described as a followed-belief of moral standards or values where moral is defined as recognizing the distinction between right and wrong and acting thereupon
The prosecution of a former president is a very serious matter that Democrats have turned into a circus. Enter Justice Clarence Thomas.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor must take a good look at precedent and the law before ruling on major cases. She did not in Trump v US.
Anytime the ideologues don’t like a United States Supreme Court decision, they attack the Court, casting the ruling as a gross miscarriage of justice.
The vote to force the government to prove its case in a court of law was 6-3. The dissent by Justice Sotomayor actually made the case for the majority opinion.
In a 6-3 decision, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the subsection used to round up and prosecute Trump voters is tethered to the subsection that addresses tampering with a record, document, or object.
On Friday, Chief Justice John Roberts knocked out the deep state by eliminating the bureaucracy’s ability to buffalo judges into agreeing to its interpretation of the law, rather than allow the judges to interpret the law as the Constitution requires.
The real reason Biden and the bureaucrats get away with ignoring the Constitution, is Congress. The bureaucracy actually does the job that Congress is too lazy to do.
A longtime friend long ago observed that when Scalia and Justice Clarence Thomas disagreed – Thomas was correct.
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court gave the state of Texas the go-ahead to implement a new law allowing Texas law enforcement to arrest illegal aliens. While Texas has no authority to deport the illegals, Texas judges will be able to issue deportation orders and Texas law enforcement will presumably turn them over to …
The United States Supreme Court, integral to the American judiciary, is often seen as the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution.
The recent Supreme Court decision to allow the removal of Texas’ border razor wire fencing, in a narrow 5-4 ruling, has sparked a significant debate about state rights and federal overreach, particularly in the context of border security. This decision not only challenges the principle of state sovereignty but also overlooks an essential constitutional provision: …
The Supreme Court will decide a number of interesting issues. Cases involving the First and Second amendments, life issues and the administrative state have all made the docket.
In the complex world of constitutional law, the incorporation doctrine stands out as a contentious element, purportedly established to safeguard individual rights against state overreach.
It’s what they don’t say that matters; Media reports on Supreme Court have the same eerie omissions
On Wednesday, August 16, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals released its opinion after hearing oral arguments in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.