Judges Gone Wild
Democrat Federal District Court Judges and one Trump 45 appointee made about 20 nationwide injunctions against the Trump 47 Administration in his first 63 days. They made 64 during his first term.
SCOTUS
The court is out of order; District judges are vetoing the president. This will not end well
Chief Justice John Roberts has his panties in a wad because the president complained about a deep-state judge ignoring the Constitution to the point where the judge demanded that the military turn a couple of planes around in midflight like he was the air traffic controller-in-chief.
SCOTUS Ethics
Ethics is described as a followed-belief of moral standards or values where moral is defined as recognizing the distinction between right and wrong and acting thereupon
Clarence Thomas v. Joe Biden
The prosecution of a former president is a very serious matter that Democrats have turned into a circus. Enter Justice Clarence Thomas.
How The “Wise Latina” Got It Very Wrong
Justice Sonia Sotomayor must take a good look at precedent and the law before ruling on major cases. She did not in Trump v US.
“The law is not ‘outraged,’ Justice Sotomayor.”
Anytime the ideologues don’t like a United States Supreme Court decision, they attack the Court, casting the ruling as a gross miscarriage of justice.
Americans 6, Deep State 3
The vote to force the government to prove its case in a court of law was 6-3. The dissent by Justice Sotomayor actually made the case for the majority opinion.
J6: Supreme Court Slaps Down Biden’s Corrupt DOJ
In a 6-3 decision, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the subsection used to round up and prosecute Trump voters is tethered to the subsection that addresses tampering with a record, document, or object.
Trump Court Rolls On
On Friday, Chief Justice John Roberts knocked out the deep state by eliminating the bureaucracy’s ability to buffalo judges into agreeing to its interpretation of the law, rather than allow the judges to interpret the law as the Constitution requires.
Bump Stock Case-Much More Than the 2A
The real reason Biden and the bureaucrats get away with ignoring the Constitution, is Congress. The bureaucracy actually does the job that Congress is too lazy to do.
Clarence Thomas Just Got Something Huge – Hugely Wrong
A longtime friend long ago observed that when Scalia and Justice Clarence Thomas disagreed – Thomas was correct.
SCOTUS: Texas Police Given Go-Ahead to Arrest Illegal Aliens
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court gave the state of Texas the go-ahead to implement a new law allowing Texas law enforcement to arrest illegal aliens. While Texas has no authority to deport the illegals, Texas judges will be able to issue deportation orders and Texas law enforcement will presumably turn them over to …
The Supreme Court’s Imperfections: A Call for Vigilant Citizenship
The United States Supreme Court, integral to the American judiciary, is often seen as the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution.
Challenging the Supreme Court’s Overreach: The Razor Wire Ruling and State Sovereignty
The recent Supreme Court decision to allow the removal of Texas’ border razor wire fencing, in a narrow 5-4 ruling, has sparked a significant debate about state rights and federal overreach, particularly in the context of border security. This decision not only challenges the principle of state sovereignty but also overlooks an essential constitutional provision: …
Coming Supreme Court Decisions
The Supreme Court will decide a number of interesting issues. Cases involving the First and Second amendments, life issues and the administrative state have all made the docket.
Flaws of the Incorporation Doctrine: A Constitutional Originalist Perspective
In the complex world of constitutional law, the incorporation doctrine stands out as a contentious element, purportedly established to safeguard individual rights against state overreach.
It’s what they don’t say that matters; Media reports on Supreme Court have the same eerie omissions
It’s what they don’t say that matters; Media reports on Supreme Court have the same eerie omissions
5th Circuit Abortion Pill Decision
On Wednesday, August 16, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals released its opinion after hearing oral arguments in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Compelling State Interest: A Flawed Doctrine Disregarding Unalienable Rights
When the Supreme Court uses “compelling state interest” to justify infringements of unalienable rights, those decisions do not hold the status of law.
Justice Alito and a Reason for Caution About SCOTUS
Justice Alito makes a misspeak and possibly opens up a dangerous can of worms regarding Congress’s power to limit the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.