A Retrospective on Write-In and Minority Party Ballot Anomalies in Wisconsin during the 2020 Election

Wisconsin election anomalies were buried after the election, too

[Note: back in 2020 and 2021, your scribe was writing periodically for UNCOVERDC, among other blogs. One of the continuing features of UNCOVERDC these days is their daily “News from Around the Web,” which captures news items collected daily from various social media sources. Well worth taking a gander if you’ve never visited their website.]

Immediately after the 2020 election, I was fortunate to be in contact with a group of independent analysts and experts in their respective fields, e.g., statistics, mathematics, computer science, etc., who provided early analysis of publicly available election data sets from Edison Research and other sources. With their concurrence, I wrote several articles that described their election analyses in several of the swing states – and their inferences that “something was rotten in the state of Denmark.”

This is the fourth of several articles that detail some of the analysis results back then. All these anomalies and idiosyncrasies that were discovered in the various reports warranted further detailed investigation to find out exactly what caused them. This was the express purpose of the team – to identify statistical improbabilities that needed to be examined in detail to ascertain causes. But of course, the legacy media and Biden regime buried the team’s analyses, and none of these anomalies were ever investigated by the Biden DoJ (or any of the various “election fraud deniers” in the legacy media).

With President Trump’s wonderful speech on 16 July that summarized five major election integrity issues in our election systems, a re-posting of some of the election fraud-related articles written in 2020 and 2021 is in order. Time to connect some dots and for the election fraud-deniers to be held accountable! The deniers are part of a long-running conspiracy to disenfranchise legitimate American voters.

The below article was posted on 20 April 2021 at UNCOVERDC here.

W.I.M.P.: The Wisconsin Electoral Votes Were Stolen, too

  • by: Stu Cvrk
  • 2021-04-20

A previous article summarized an important study by retired DoD analyst Ray Blehar that concluded that there was a high probability of systematic vote-shifting (theft) of Write-In and Minority Party (WIMP) votes in Pennsylvania in favor of Joe Biden during the ballot adjudication process. Several of the key findings in Pennsylvania included the following:

  • Biden’s margin of victory could have only been obtained through adjudication manipulation
  • Only 453 write-in votes were received by mail-in ballot (an improbably low number given past elections); the likely tens of thousands of write-in ballots were adjudicated improperly
  • The Libertarian candidate for president received ~20K votes fewer than down-ballot Libertarian candidates; the Green Party presidential candidate received ~34K fewer votes than down ballot Green candidates (both improbabilities indicate vote shifting took place)
  • Vote switching analysis determined that ~64K absentee ballot votes were taken from Trump and switched to Trump through the adjudication process; ~80K election day votes were also switched from Trump to Biden
  • The total adjudication manipulation resulted in Biden winning by ~80,500 votes, but in reality, President Trump actually won Pennsylvania by over 186,000 votes

Blehar has also completed an analysis of Wisconsin’s WIMP vote and found a similar pattern with an interesting wrinkle: there were no WIMP votes tabulated during the infamous early morning ballot spike on 4 November. What follows is a summary of Blehar’s analysis and conclusions.

First of all, the total number of WIMP votes cast in Wisconsin declined by 132,307 votes from 2016 to 2020. This is an immediate red flag just as was the ~294K decrease in WIMP votes in Pennsylvania. However, down-ballot data was not available for Wisconsin, so Blehar analyzed times series data and historical election data in Wisconsin from Edison Research’s National Election Polling (NEP) data, which is used by all major media for continuous election updates reported by the states.

As the table below shows, the Edison computations in Wisconsin very closely matched the official results with the exception of write-in ballots. Blehar’s Edison computations determined that there should have been about 45,000 more write-in ballots in 2020 due to a higher voter turnout from 2016. Those “missing” ~37K write-in votes are more than Biden’s victory in Wisconsin!

Additionally, the 2020 Green Party presidential candidate received only 1,089 write-in votes compared to the 31,072 votes received by the 2016 Green Party candidate. This indicates a high probability that approximately 0,000 write-in votes were shifted from the Green Party candidate through the adjudication process.

Note: the adjudication process is supposed to be a manual determination by election workers of the “intent of the voter” for ballots cast that automatic ballot marking devices cannot accurately count, e.g., write-in ballots, double-marked ballots, misaligned ballots, etc. Adjudication can easily be corrupted by dishonest election workers or by a systemic issue, such as vote shifting malware. Blehar believes the latter is more likely given the scale of the problem and the patterns of the shifts.

Vote shifting observed in the Edison data essentially stopped right after a large dump of votes at 3:42AM EST. Prior to that time, Biden had gained approximately 12,000 votes through the adjudication process while Trump had gained approximately 17,000 votes. Similar shift patterns were observed in Georgia and Pennsylvania where votes were somewhat evenly split up until around 3AM – then shifting went heavily in Biden’s direction.

Two dumps at 3:42 and slightly after resulted in Biden overcoming Trump’s nearly 110,000 vote lead, as shown in the below figure:

There should have been at least 10,000 WIMP votes in those dumps based on historical patterns, but in reality, there were none counted. That is a statistical anomaly and red flag.

An examination of two key heavily Democrat counties also shows the absence of WIMP votes. The following chart shows the comparison of 2016 to 2020 voting in Milwaukee County, which shows that Bidens’ margin of victory in the county was nearly identical to the “missing” WIMP votes (almost certainly vote shifting through improper adjudication).

The Dane County results showing the comparison of 2016 to 2020 voting is provided below:

The total missing (improperly adjudicated) WIMP ballots in Dane and Milwaukee counties is approximately 33,000 votes, with the rest of the missing 132K WIMP votes scattered in other counties across the state. Given the increased voter turnout in Wisconsin in 2020, it is HIGHLY improbable that there were thousands of fewer WIMP votes in these two counties in 2020 than in 2016. Where did those votes go?

Conclusion: The “missing” WIMP votes that were adjudicated to Biden almost certainly provided his ~20K margin of victory in the state of Wisconsin. That makes two states that were stolen from President Trump. Stay tuned.

<End of the article posted in March 2021>

CONCLUDING THOUGHTS

The issues uncovered in the above 2021 article were never investigated or explained. None of the cottage industry of election fraud deniers that sprang up after the 2020 election bothered to investigate the anomalies discovered in this or any other independent reports written at the time that questioned the integrity of the 2020 election. They were too busy parroting Chris Krebs, then the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Under Secretary, who pronounced that the election was “the most secure in U.S. history.”

In retrospect given what else has dribbled out about 2020 election fraud since then, this is simple malpractice by the legacy media – and by the RNC who basically rolled over on the topic. After all, there has NEVER been a full forensic election audit conducted in ANY county in the US. But that’s a story for another day….

The end.

StuinSD is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support his work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

This article originally appeared in Stu Cvrk’s Substack. Reprinted here with permission

If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.

Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA

Leave a Comment