The answer to my title is only one survived an assassination attempt.
Trump’s miraculous close call was just a matter of time. I observed earlier in these articles that the deep state swamp was going to come to the realization at some point that only the “JFK solution” remained for them.
We don’t need no stinking investigation-except on the shooter. Heads should roll over this government failure, at a minimum the head of Secret Service (SS,) Kimberly Cheatle-who retired in 2019- but was brought back for reasons unknown.
If she had any class or integrity, she would have resigned by now. This is why there were no agents positioned on the most vulnerable threat location…
“That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there’s a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn’t want to put somebody up on a sloped roof. And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside,” she said.
Hmmm, so the SS folks who are prepared to give their life to protect in accordance with their mission, did not take an intuitively obvious precaution because of slope…it’s sure weird that it didn’t deter the shooter…
The picture accompanying this article says a lot about myriad problems with our woke, stupid-which translates into incompetence and mission failure-government agencies. The SS did a great job protecting Trump after he was savvy enough to drop and cover.
I can’t say the same about the apparent teenage SS agent female who at least provides protection up to Trump’s abdomen-how bout get somebody who can actually perform the mission? I wonder if she could lift 240 LBs in a pinch (goes for me, too-but I would not expect to be selected for such a detail.)
And-yes-I have daughters-hua,-woman power-but no matter how much training, expertise, mission experience they have-they could not protect nor lift their brother who is 5 inches taller and 100 pounds heavier…
In the military it was the driver and tire issue. You have to change a flat on a deuce and a half—well, help me take the lugs off, lift the tire for me, put the new tire back on, tighten the lugs, and she’s done.
What an absolutely unsatisfactory, wimpy, weenie excuse for leadership this POS presents. Imagine the Army-well, the sun was out, and we were running dangerously short on sunscreen, so we decided to provide protection from the shop. Which shop? The donut shop.
It was raining out and we didn’t want to get our weapons wet…
I was wearing my new battle dress uniform, and I didn’t want to get dirty. Besides, I had just shined my boots. If I fire my weapon, I have to clean it: I figured others would shoot. I didn’t want to get wet by jumping in the water. I think the food we eat in the field is “icky.”
The same with the lead (agent in charge) of this detail, to the supervisor of close protection and any involved in the planning, management and execution of this mission. The lead observer for the sniper team.
I’ve spent the bulk of the articles making the point that our government had myriad clues, indicators, reasons and plenty of time to prevent the assassination of President John F. Kennedy: the one ingredient lacking was almost certainly, will.
The powers that be in the cabal of our government-particularly the Vice President (VP,) FBI, CIA, and evidence indicates the SS, as well as the mafia, the military, powerful businessman in the oil industry, and individuals involved in the plot to assassinate Fidel Castro-led by RFK-formed a cabal that was successful in taking out the most popular president in our lifetime.
It was not what “they did” that killed JFK: it was what they didn’t do, which was their mandate to protect our president with their lives. JFK had already faced assassination plots in Chicago and Miami, canceling the Chicago plans and pressing through in Miami. Officials reported no threats in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area, but that lie has been debunked earlier in this article series simply reporting on facts that were buried and hidden from the public.
Any rookie security official doing close protection security planning on Dealy Plaza would have identified some dozens of security vulnerability points, with at least 6 high threat, line of sight (LOS) hazards. Protocol dictates-demands these points be blocked, manned, occupied and/or put under sniper coverage.
Over time the truth came out that nearly each of these security vulnerabilities were points of engagement: Book Repository, Dal-Tex building, grassy knoll, RR Bridge overpass, the underpass, and the sewer drain: just for starters.
The coverup and propaganda from our government was such a vast enterprise that many believe to this day that Oswald was the lone gunman-even in the face of facts revealed in the re-creation of the assassination, for instance, shots from the front, back and side.
Honestly, I think anybody who still believes the lone gunman theory is ignorant-in the context of uniformed, or stupid. A third option would be-no-I can’t think of one.
Our government-led by VP Lyndon Johnson and FBI Dir J. Edgar Hoover-basically did nothing about this conspiracy to kill JFK and then led the coverup after the fact.
The head of the SS and all supervisors involved in the JFK security detail should have resigned in embarrassment and/or been fired once LBJ took over. There is a somewhat shocking video where SS agents are being waved off their normal positions riding on detail points on the JFK limousine, an absolute puzzling change in SS protocol.
It’s probably just me, but unless I had some type of inside baseball knowledge, how comfortable would you be-as LBJ-to “slide into” JFK’s position-unless you knew enough about “schtuff” to make you “comfortable?”
One thing is certain, LBJ was able to head-off all ongoing congressional investigations against him represented by the Billy Sol Estes-one of his biggest supporters and money sources-conviction on corruption charges over government grain allocations and Ponzi schemes, the coverup of which resulted in the death of the Department of Agriculture’s investigator-Frank Marshall.
The Trump assassination attempt some sixty-one years later evidences the same pattern of malfeasance, incompetence, failure of due diligence on the part of the SS, and a pattern of simply inexplicable rookie mistakes on the part of the security detail.
It is not funny but more “comical,” in the “clown” sense of the term, that our government is doing a deep investigation into the “matter.”
Any rookie analyst supporting the risk analysis of the venue would have identified all LOS risk points to the protectee. We use “Viewshed Analysis,” ARC GIS or a variety of commercially available tools to accomplish the identification of any and all such positions and to prioritize them in terms of risk (typically analyst support teams assigned to the agencies, or as augmentation details for designated national security events.)
The below LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) product can be viewed as a simple happy snap of the Capital. Analysts recognize a three-dimensional data set that can be ingested by commercial tools and manipulated to determine all LOS hazards to things like the Capital entrance point.
Given the available data set(s)-which can be produced from inexpensive Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in a variety of spectrums (e.g., electric optic, infrared, radar, LIDAR, etc.) in a very short time by the on-site security team-it is unimaginable-unfathomable and indicting that a maniac sniper would gain access to an identified LOS vulnerability position at this small venue. Never mind get shots off under the apparently incompetent eyes of the security (sniper) team.
They have one job. Was it incompetence? Restrictive ROE? Lack of training? Failure to react? On our ranch this is a barn door question: who was the last one through that door/gate responsible to close it?
This (Viewshed) is a basic, security 101 tool that has been in extensive use by intelligence support teams to federal agencies as far back as my involvement in working the data and technology aspects of this type of mission (and prior to that since ~1986 in applications for things like satellite hearability/visibility checks for military receive antennae systems and Global Positioning System coverage, among dozens of like analytic efforts.)
The other technique that evolved over time but was brought online post Katrina (2005) was the use of mobile networks, integrated UAV systems, analyst toolkit and communications environmental testing equipment to ensure security teams can communicate. A lot of this effort on the part of the govt over the years has focused on some type of common communications devices and protected channels for things like first responders, security local law enforcement and contract security.
And so what? The point is these tools are standard fare, 101 basic minimum applications, ubiquitous, routine, proven and-more importantly-in abundance and have been perfected to the point where the security support team-I’m talking the monitoring and analysis team-whatever it is called these days-has a very small footprint and only one mission as the designated event unfolds.
I don’t know about the security details-our teams were responsible to pull together those data sets, conduct preliminary analysis, identify risk points from air, elevated structures and ground, produce products and participate in mission planning and execution.
Take a look at this Epoch Times article with a picture of the assassination grounds. You don’t have to be an analyst to notice high risk points of vulnerability with LOS to the package. The graphic accompanying this Epoch Times story (picture above) is a total embarrassment for the Secret Service and any and all LEA involved in the security detail.
Folks with no threat-intelligence-security-analysis chops can take one look at the overview and figure out where there might be a point of vulnerability or two that might bear watching by the sniper team and occupied by agents or LEA.
In other articles I’ve discussed the increasingly disturbing, politically motivated Rules of Engagement (ROE) that our government often puts in place. Whether we look at lessons learned from Vietnam, Bosnia, Iraq or todays “cover your ass” political interference with Israel, and our own military as recently as Afghanistan and the bombing that killed 13 service members, the result is nearly always the same.
Look at the SS sniper position and the most likely risk point on the building overlooking where Trump was speaking. How is it possible that a nutjob with a rifle got off any shots from that position without having their head blown off?
Well, how is it possible USMC snipers identified the known IED vulnerability in Afghanistan, and yet were not given permission to engage?
This article outlines how a local LEA security officer encountered the maniac who trained a rifle on him-and he backed-off. How is it possible this information did not get passed within security? How did the sniper team not observe this and take this maniac out before any shots were fired? Why was Trump allowed on stage?
I worked with a lot of good analysts over the years, and a lot of rookies. Incompetent ones simply did not get to do the big boy and girl’s analysis missions, for instance, products for the Presidential Daily Briefing.
This was third world nation security, reminiscent of the time there was an IED incident at a gate leading into the US Embassy in Iraq. Our team in the Washington Navy Yard was sent the video to do an analysis to see what we discovered.
I sat in on the analysis and the answer was as plain as the nose on your face. Number 1, only one of the cameras-out of half a dozen funded by the US government-worked. Number 2, about an hour and twenty minutes into the video-three minutes before the reported IED detonation, the camera was dismounted and place on its side facing the guard shock. The explosion was astounding, but the camera survived-and so did the tape.
Was this an inside job? Who trusts the DOJ, DHS, FBI or SS to investigate this assassination attempt against President Trump?
Who would believe anything they report???
Max Dribbler
18 July 2024
LSMBTG: Lamestream media echo chamber (LMEC-L) social media (SM) big tech tyrants (BT) government (G) and Academia (A.)
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA
1 thought on “The Assassination of the President (JFK) of the United States of America Closing on 60: What Do Donald Trump, JFK, RFK, MLK and Malcolm X Not Have In Common? Part 7”