In Parts 1 and 2 I made the case that this recent Durham court submission related to Sussman settles for all time the question of whether the Russia Collusion Hoax reached into the White House: no question it does.
In the wake of the report of the HRC plan approved 26 July 2016 to douse the Trump campaign with disinformation about Russians colluding with him to smear HRC, and Brennan briefing President Obama on those facts on 28 July 2016 (although murky as to the true date,) it was a bit of a surprise when the Intelligence Community (the IC) acknowledged it by sending an investigative referral to the FBI 7 Sep 2016.
This was an outlier of sorts in the big picture events ongoing because it exposed this “plot” within the system, vulnerable to FOIA, congressional oversight, potential leaks, etc. Which likely explains why whomever made the decision to commit to a course of action to generate the referral-four months away from an election, tolerated slow rolling it to where it wasn’t published until September: and that had to be President Obama.
What proof do we have of that? Short of a video or voice recording-or a blue dress-we have to rely on emails and texts exchanged between the key players, many of which are detailed in the 7 February 2018 Senate Majority Interim Report: The Clinton Email Scandal and the FBI’s Investigation of it. On 2 September 2016 Page wrote about preparing talking points for Director Comey because-as detailed in the report- “POTUS wants to know everything we’re doing (page 15, item 7.)”
If the Obama administration was interested in fixing or solving the HRC problem-why wouldn’t or didn’t some responsible adult just call HRC in at the end of July 2016 and tell her-like a Jason Bourne movie-to “shut it down?” That is the type of job the WH Chief of Staff eats up with a spoon. Why commit it to a referral?
A referral had to be staffed, coordinated, put through the process-I described the government’s efforts in that regard as being done at all deliberate speed. Like the old boating joke, “I’m not a fast Captain, I’m not a slow Captain, I’m a half fast Captain.” In the time it takes to do an important government memo like this one-in the midst of the most divisive election in American history-there is no telling what could happen in that time “void.” Was this referral tasked to the DNI to be processed at the correct pace?
And OBTW, it is important to recall that the WH had a lingering problem over it like a dark cloud related to HRC’s email server that might have informed the decision. President Obama-in response to a direct question about it-launched the bold-faced lie heard round the world 7 March 2015 that he heard about it “the same time as you did”-a la the great Marvin Gaye’s grapevine–or the LSMBTG. Now these are politicians-so unlike ordinary Americans who don’t grade, or color code lies-this class of humans has a veritable plethora of options when it comes to the truth. On that scale this was the tippy top, hide out at Camp David for a week, visit a friend in Canada, outright foot in mouth, through the teeth category: a whopper. Never mind a number, you must get a bigger Pinocchio to support it.
What made it even more problematic is that while Obama had no concern whatsoever about the LSMBTG or the public thinking he committed a little fib’n in the garden, his problem was Locomotive Breath-like: the entire HRC campaign team heard it, knew about it, feigned outrage and righteous indignation-breathed a sigh of relief-and traded some high fives. HRC was not going to go down-alone-over any email server-she wasn’t that kind of girl. Obama’s problem is best expressed by the lyrics: “He hears the silence howling, catches angels as they fall, and the all-time winner, has got him by the balls.” Obama Chief of Staff Podesta joined the HRC campaign January 2016.
Does anybody think this huge faux pas by Obama had any ripple effect? I don’t know, there was this weird chance tarmac meeting 27 June 2016 between President Clinton and AG Lynch. Just a coincidental encounter that seemed blown out of all proportions until pressure built for Lynch to recuse herself. 30 June 2016 we have Comey staffing to FBI leadership his proposed statement about the HRC emails. Lynch came forward on 1 July 2016, announcing she would abide by the FBI’s recommendation. Boy Scout and general good guy James Comey stepped up to the plate-provided the copy of his prepared notes to DOJ late in the day on 4 July 2016-did not coordinate or ask permission or bounce his intended message off anybody in his chain of command-just stepped up to the microphone the next morning and detailed all the problematic and law-breaking acts that HRC had engaged in with her email server. Usurping the DOJ’s sole authority in the disposition of these matters, punctuated by the statement that “no prosecutor would charge in this case.” In a case replete with illegal activity that would send you or I to jail: Oh my! Many Americans’ listening to his speech believed right up to the end that she was finally going to be held accountable for “something”.
Let’s lay the highlights of the above timeline flat so it is a bit easier to follow.
-
- 2 March 2015: HRC unclassified email server becomes a serious thing
- 7 March 2015: President Obama big lie about hearing about the server
- 27 June 2016: Chance (winky, winky) meeting on Arizona tarmac between President Clinton and AG Lynch
- 30 June 2016: Comey staffs within FBI senior leadership the HRC email charge dismissal statement
- 1 July 2016: AG Lynch recuses herself and announces she will abide by the FBI decision
- 2 July 2016: FBI interviews HRC about the emails
- 5 July 2016: Comey dismisses notion of bringing charges against HRC (technically only DOJ can dismiss)
- 5 July 2016: President Obama joins HRC on the campaign trail for the first time
- 26 July 2016: HRC approves staff plan for a Russian hoax operation to smear DJT
- 28* July 2016: CIA Brennan briefs President Obama on the HRC Russian smear plan
- 26 August 2016: CIA Brennan briefs Senate Majority Leader Reid and Gang of Eight (disputed) on Russian collusion being undertaken on behalf of Trump to harm HRC (squirrel)
- 28 August 2016: Senator Reid sends request to FBI for Comey to investigate DJT Russian collusion (squirrel)
- 7 September 2016: IC forwards an investigative referral to the FBI on the HRC Russian smear plan (ho hum)
- 28 September 2016: Page participates in a strategy meeting at FBI with McCabe about “100s of thousands of HRC’s emails” turned over to Southern District of New York by Anthony Weiner’s lawyers (ho hum)
- 21 October 2016: Strzok writes Page that Dep Asst Dist Attorney George Toscas wanted to know FBI thoughts on HRC emails (ho hum)
- 28 October 2016: Comey informs congress about new emails found on Weiner’s laptop (only took a month)
- 2 November 2016: McCabe recuses himself
- 4 November 2016: Strzok writes Page about the “fate of the free world hanging in the balance over the email review
- 6 November 2021: Comey clears HRC for a second time-writes congress “We have not changed our conclusions”
By the time all this had shaken out the FBI determined that over 100 emails contained classified information, including 65 SECRET emails, 22 TOP SECRET and some 2093 emails that were upgraded to CONFIDENTIAL. There is another category of government emails considered sensitive, but unclassified that run on what many refer to as the “SBU,” the equivalent to commercial internet. Every picture you see of HRC or Obama or any official with a Blackberry Rim device or iPad-that is the SBU network run out of government facilities and the emails on those devices are strictly for government business. Those are the type of devices where these emails ended up going: all 2193 of them. In a “leak” of this magnitude nobody talks about the SBU…
Either the White House Communications Agency-many military-or some special team from the Secret Service sets these devices up specifically for our most senior leaders in government. And the only way Barrack Obama was receiving HRC’s emails on the Blackberry from her illegal server-under an alias or pseudonym that he assumed as an identity-is it had to be programmed into the device by technical staff at his direction.
For those unaware, these devices are expressly forbidden from all classified government spaces and when found, are confiscated, assessed, wiped clean and a violation is generated referring the offending person to security for action. Most government spaces have devices that automatically detect signals from them so security can track them down and disposition them. There is no hard and fast policy when such a violation happens, but options range from suspension of clearances, access, fines, admonishment and reprimands are all in play: it is a serious problem in this era of proliferating mobile tech devices.
HRC received the same treatment you or I would for creating an illegal unclassified personal server for her email service, receiving, forwarding, sending classified information over it via the State Department, where headers were either clipped off-or not. Placing the national security of the United States of America at risk, disregarding her oath of office based on allegiance to the constitution like it was optional and incriminating everybody she included in her email scam, including the President and Vice President (who we haven’t touched upon) of the United States. And thereby avoiding FOIA and congressional oversight.
I know somebody who put together a draft speech touting commercial small satellite capability and its advantages over government processes not only in agility-the speed at which they produce satellites-but the manner and speed with which they improve and innovate the individual satellite design using 3D fabrication and computer generated CAD developments (for cube sats) that cost ~1/10th of 1/10th of 1% of what the government was spending (under 400K per article) and took only a few months to produce and get to space (if they could find a ride.) This was put together for an unclassified forum by a subject matter expert who knew classification parameters and had participated in the revamping of security regulations to update 2005 policy to 2015. Government security knew better and determined it addressed US satellite vulnerabilities, impounded the devices used to coordinate this speech and opened up an investigation that took nearly 14 months. It was reported as a security violation to the DNI and statused every quarter until dismissed. It cost the subject of the investigation their bonus that year.
Those not in the business of national security likely know about the classification category of TOP SECRET. The definition of this category includes the caveat that “compromise or unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave danger to the national security of the United States,” with SECRET the “compromise or disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause serious damage to the national security of the United States.” For CONFIDENTIAL “compromise or disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause damage to the national security of the United States.”
Change the name from HRC-make it Max Dribbler-change the circumstances-just some government smuck who was lazy and didn’t want to have to commute all the way into work to read traffic or to get important “stuff”-fighting DC traffic, parking, getting in and out with security, gaining access to the vault in many places-like in DC-where they don’t routinely access or work in an environment like they do in the intel agencies, which are just large security environments or sensitive compartmented information facilities (SCIFs,) struggling with the government computer system-which often does updates, maintenance and “boinks” on the weekends. Max would be treated just the same, right? Hahahaha, uh, not exactly-Max would be broke, homeless and fitted for orange pajamas, be known by a number-like Leavenworth resident BR-549.
If I knew somebody who had the talent and chops to put together such a server and had access and the means (and I know a bunch of them,) but most importantly was willing to do it-I would turn them over to the FBI in a skinny minute. That’s like talking to somebody who has a genius plan to rob a bank or knock off a Brink’s Truck.
Contrast HRC’s treatment by Comey and his “crew” with the schifty way they dealt with great American Patriot LTG Michael Flynn or the scummy lying they perpetrated on the FISA court that ruined Carter Page’s life, reputation and ability to work.
Do we have at least a two-tiered justice system? All the focus of the above distractions were about mitigating and downplaying the damage done to national security by HRC’s email server to facilitate her election chances: to protect presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who the swampy borg had decided (what is a better term, blackmailed?) to clear any hurdles necessary to facilitate the next first in American history, elevating the most-scandal ridden American politician to the presidency.
Do you recall the outcry, stink and controversy when the LSMBTG got into this story and pressured the government to conduct the more widespread damage control assessment that included President Obama, Vice President Biden, the WH inner circle, DNI, CIA Dir and all those known to communicate with HRC’s illegal email server?
Neither do I: cause it never happened….
Max Dribbler
25 February 2022
Follow AFNN
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAz…
Twitter: @AFNNUSA
GETTR: @AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA
Patriot.Online: @AFNN
1 thought on “The Hildebeast Exposed”