Planned Parenthood’s Boffo South Carolina Profits
By Robert of Rosemont
Six Week Human Twenty Week Human Global Killer of Humans
South Carolina Supreme Court strikes down state abortion ban
JAMES POLLARD
January 6, 2023, 10:57 AM
My Mother was 40 years old when I was born. I was the fifth of five boys…and her eighth child, but her ninth pregnancy. In 1950, two weeks from delivering her fourth child, she woke with no stirring in her womb. The wife of an active-duty Naval Officer, she asked the base OB/GYN for action. Since, the doctor outranked her husband by two ranks, she accepted the doctor’s view of her “progress.” And that decision haunted her the rest of her life.
The next day, still no stirring, she went back to the base OB/GYN clinic and demanded a C-Section on the spot. The doctor arrived two hours later (after his golf game!). During the procedure, my Mother lost a great deal of blood. The Doctor did not know why she survived. Her baby was not that lucky. Baby Mary was strangled by the umbilical. Today, Mary would have been called a “non-viable fetus.” But that is not how my Mother saw it. She lived the next SIXTY years, wondering why she listened to the base OB/GYN. Why was she more concerned with military protocol and less concerned with her baby?
The OB/GYN had never birthed a baby before. My Mother had already delivered three healthy boys…all full term. A deeply religious woman, my Mother worried. Since she had failed her baby, how could she possibly qualify for heaven? And this “heaven” was not some mythical place. My Mother knew full well there was this “better place.”
For THAT story, you will have to buy a ticket as I have written several movie scripts that detail my Mother’s specific near death experience. All that said, her trailing five kids were all delivered via C-Section and taken exactly TWO WEEKS before we were all due. No surprise. But what just happened in DEEPLY RED South Carolina IS A SURPRISE.
Planned Parenthood attorneys successfully argued to overturn the six-week fetal heartbeat ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court of Feb. 2021. The new ruling allows abortion up to twenty weeks. Given modern technology, many twenty-week babies have survived premature births. That said, what do I mean by BOFFO PROFITS for Planned Parenthood? The answer to that question is pretty “black and white” or in this case “fetus and baby.” Now what follows is pretty alarming, but so is systemic genocide and planned murder in a society that considers itself “civilized.”
Planned Parenthood was started by Margaret Sanger. She designed and funded the “new institution” to restrict births from “low character” women, i.e. black and brown women. Sanger wanted to protect and secure the larger white population in the United States. Sanger believed black and brown women fornicate like rabbits and therefore, the white population of “good” Americans would be over-whelmed by “bad” Americans. In Sanger’s view, she was protecting America from people of “low character.” Clearly Planned Parenthood is the embodiment of systemic racism in a country that has a tradition of the same. But today, Planned Parenthood is also a “big business.”
A single abortion at Planned Parenthood cost about $600. If all of the 930,000 U.S. abortions in 2021 occurred at a Planned Parenthood clinic, that would yield an annual gross revenue of $558,000,000. Moreover, the baby parts themselves are sold to stem cell researchers. To be specific, the new court ruling would mean big profits for Planned Parenthood of South Carolina. According to the Center For Medical Progress, the South Carolina ruling could spike Planned Parenthood’s per abortion profits by $750 per liver and $1600 for liver/thymus pairs. Go pull on that thread….
https://www.centerformedicalprogress.org/2020/05/planned-parenthood-testimony-on-selling-baby-parts-unsealed-new-videos-released/
“The video shows StemExpress paid Planned Parenthood solely based on the number of “usable” samples that StemExpress could harvest from PPMM’s abortions, at least an extra $65 per abortion if the customer ordered a fetal organ plus a blood sample. PPMM does over 17,000 abortions a year, and unsealed invoices show PPMM making $25,000 in just 3 months from StemExpress. When asked how much money an abortion clinic could make per year from selling fetal body parts, the founder and CEO of Planned Parenthood partner Advanced Bioscience Resources, Linda Tracy, was forbidden by her lawyer to answer.”
Simply put, a twenty-week baby human has MUCH MORE profitable human tissue than a six-week baby human. Since premature, twenty-week babies HAVE BEEN DELIVERED and have survived the premature birth, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruling is by its nature, evil incarnate. To be sure, by a 3 to 2 margin,
- South Carolina doctors can legally kill a baby that has in the past, survived the birthing process
- Planned Parenthood can sell the baby parts for PROFIT.
Just let that “soak in” for a moment. Then ask yourself where we (modern Americans) find ourselves on the “civilized spectrum.” For that conversation, let us meet one of the founders of Modern Anthropology.
John Wesley Powell is a minor figure in US history. He was an Oberlin College graduate and an officer from Ohio during the Civil War. He lost his arm at the bloodiest battle in US history. Having survived Shilo, General Ulysses Grant made Powell a cartographer. Powell’s duty was to sketch a map of the battlefield, from a hot air balloon! When the war was over, and Grant won the White House, Powell joined Grant in Washington, DC. The one-armed man had a very specific duty.
Immigrants from Europe continued to flood into East Coast cities, turning the once “planned urban communities,” into sprawling, over-crowded slums, infested with horse manure, open sewers and rats. Grant wanted to relocate the new immigrants “out West,” where the American tradition of “yeomen farming” could continue. But to work the land and produce the food the growing country requires, Powell needed to locate viable and predictable sources of water. So what Lewis and Clark had done in the Northwest, Powell would accomplish in the high desert, North of Mexico. Here is where Powell founded the first study of Modern Anthropology. He viewed the Hobi, Zuni and Navajo Indians as “savages,” albeit “noble savages.” Powell considered himself “civilized.” The middle ground of course is “barbarian.”
Surveying the West for President Grant (1869) Director of Ethnology at the Smithsonian (1879 – death)
All that said, following the Battle of Wounded Knee in South Dakota (Dec. 19, 1890), could Powell identify with the 7th Cavalry of the US Army? Afterall, in the battle with the Indians, the Cavalry killed 90 warriors and 200 women and children!
Since the 7th Cavalry was clearly more savage than the savages themselves, would the Cavalry be considered barbarians or savages? How could the Cavalry possibly be considered civilized? That said, how could anyone (individuals, corporations, Congress, Presidents) who supports the systemic destruction of our next generation be considered civilized? Let’s put this in perspective.
Based on exit polling from the Romney vs. Obama 2012 election, 64% of Americans believe there are advanced civilizations elsewhere in the Universe. In 2021, Pew Research reports an “off-world” uptick to 65%.
If true, why haven’t these advanced off-worlders contacted a New York Times reporter or spoke at the podium with the General Assembly at the United Nations? Afterall, our radio and tv signals have been beamed into space since the 1930’s. In 1977, when Jimmy Carter christened deep space probes Voyager I and Voyager II he added the below personal note.
Based on the above Presidential “appeal,” who among the “community of galactic civilizations” would want to engage the people of Earth, when the recognized Super Power on our planet:
- developed nuclear weapons for use on their own species (noncombatants in Hiroshima and Nagasaki)
- systemically murders the next generation before they are born (600 Planned Parenthood clinics in U.S.)
- Planned Parenthood has exported their “operations” around the world to Burkina Faso, Ecuador, Guatemala, Kenya, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, Senegal and Uganda.
Further, the UN Security Council member countries are the largest exporters of weapons in the world!
If we were a space faring people, traveling the universe, and came upon a similar planet as our own, would we touch down and say “hey, what’s up?”…or would we move along to the next planet, in the hope of finding a “civilized” population? I’m just sayin’.
Keep the faith and BE GOOD.
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
Parler: https://parler.com/AFNNUSA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA
An appeal to SCOTUS should settle this. The SC Supreme Court got this one wrong. Abortion restrictions are NOT unconstitutional. The left never stops trying to undermine civilized societies.
I’d hope so, too.
But, until the day that it is codified into law, that abortion is also murder, meaning that a human fetus is a human being, and killing the fetus is the same as killing any human being, we are going to continue to see atrocities like this South Carolina Supreme Court decision.
In the Old and the New Testament, we are told to respect and obey authority. That gets taken further in the writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas and others about there being just and unjust laws. Natural and divine law gets argued by Martin Luther to a great extent, and not being a student on the topic, I can only assume that both made valid points. God’s law, handed down to Moses is the foundation of all law in society. “Thou shall not kill” is as basic and solid as it can be, so maybe, one day, that commandment will be honored in its entirety, which would include fetuses.
Even if one only views the stories in the Old Testament as just stories, there would be absolute reasons for their inclusion. The foundation of all law, natural and human.
I don’t even have to use the Biblical argument that abortion is murder, when you have biology, and all those who wish to not interfere with the nature of life. Just ask a biologist, an honest one, when life begins. They won’t be saying “When the baby is born”. And then tell the ones who want to continue to perform those pagan rituals to answer which biological species goes and kills their unborn. I don’t know of any. They can’t answer that question without lying, which just happens to be breaking another Commandment.
But put two lawyers arguing against each other and this is one way it can turn out. Flat out wrong. The current makeup of SCOTUS would probably do much better than South Carolina’s version.
An African American preacher was on Tucker tonight.
His fourteen year old daughter was being recruited to an Abortion rights rally.
She declined, “I am a Christian and I vote my values.”
Pretty simple and to the point.
Sadly, few people in the middle understand that simple idea.
The big question…how do we conservatives convince the middle Independents that
the Democrats mean to ruin this country? The signs are all around us, but
they can not see them. Robert
There may be people who disagree, but until Congress makes the sale of body parts from these procedures illegal, we’ll never know if it was to “save the life of the mother” or simply a “for profit” transaction. If there was a real attempt to “do good,” anything that was obtained via a procedure such as this should be donated to the “cause of advancing science. ” If not, all we’re doing is subsidizing a modern Burke and Hare.
If people are making money by legislating the gestation of a child…only to kill that growing child, we all know that such a transaction on the part of ALL THE PARTIES, means the PARTIES are evil. And if someone wants to make an argument, then those someone’s are also evil…even if they don’t know it. The murder of innocents will be the demise of our country and our world. Robert
In a previous life, I worked at a large hospital in the south, where a lot of organ transplants got their donor kidneys and other organs plucked and shipped to the recipient. We used to call them “Vultures”. I’m not saying this to scare off organ donors, but to make a distinction between them and the abortionist. The abortionist has only one primary function: to remove a living fetus, and in many cases, a viable one. “In the name of science” has no place in the killing of the unborn, that is, if you take the Commandment “Thou shalt not kill” seriously. Science should take a back seat to the issue, in all situations because it relies on the bastardization of the argument, which ends up as a way for justification where no justification can exist. Killing an unborn is exactly as Moloch expected. Science and technology can too easily be the scapegoat that evil uses to destroy us all. Science can use rats, but not babies, else they be a character in a Shelley novel.
The “Vultures” went right up to the edge, and were checked by rules and procedures all the way. Their mission was, and is proper until the day we are all taken, live, to the OR and our organs are plucked and allowed to die, right there. The abortionist just kills. “Vulture” was a sarcastic attempt to characterize what some thought was a gruesome act, but done correctly and with the right intentions, by first, doing no harm. I can’t find any reason for any abortion to be justified, in the name of science or other.
The way I can understand science and technology is when those who engage in it have very strict and moral guidelines, like the basic ones God gave Moses. Trusting human nature to deal with this issue is fraught with too many pitfalls. When you see a medical ethicist twisting up his own ethics to justify an abominable procedure, the sin is too obvious. I believe Hippocrates would agree that by “First doing no harm” includes the taking of a living fetus, for experimentation, or he wouldn’t have said it. Killing is harm, no matter how you do it.
I seriously doubt the abortionist could care less about the life of the mother as opposed to the life of the unborn, except in a hospital OR where it is purely the intent of delivering a baby where both are threatened from unavoidable acts, which is very rare. I agree that the selling of fetal body parts should be illegal. It is part of another illegal and immoral act against the unborn.