The democrats tell us they are out of touch without telling us they are out of touch.
In the lefty and dem world, as opposed to the real or lived experience world, sports participants will soon be lining up so officials can inspect their genitalia to qualify them for competition in sporting events: cause that’s apparently the way they do it in mythical “demtown.”
As compared to the “real world” of life experiences where no athlete is allowed to compete at any level without undergoing a physical by an actual physician to indemnify the sponsor and/or school against frivolous lawsuits.
The dem pronouncement is more propaganda than actual belief-the very definition of “gaslighting,” but it links to the only form of “pedophilia” or perversion that dems seem unified against, the myth of the official or parent genitalia inspector that is rarer than hens’ teeth and the unicorn.
Disregard the made up, pure idjiotcy and nonsensical pretzel logic they force their supporters to accept to buy into the idea. Many of whom have children and know about the requirements for their children to go through the process of playing sports.
Call it the scourge of the proverbial pecker checker, that deranged pervert alleged to be trolling sports fields across America.
There have been myriad polls about the issue of allowing males to participate in female sports-it is a loser. The public overwhelmingly condemns the idea by numbers that are unheard in these type polls, like nearly 80-20% in favor of banning such participation.
The American public does not want males playing sports with females: it is a failed issue that undoes all the goodness that Title IX achieved for female sports.
So why was the vote in congress equally lopsided in an upside-down way, where it looked like this:
If you can believe anything anymore, dems say it was because of the aforementioned pecker police stupidity that dems voted this way. It is about protecting our children: that’s their story.
I know what you are thinking: Max, that is some preposterous bullspittle right there. But here is the dem leader in his own words.
Think that’s a one off? Here is Rep Jennifer McClellan exploding Leland Vittert’s head with her nonsense talking points:
McClellan answered, “I don’t think that the American people want school professionals pulling their children’s pants down to determine what sports team they should play on.”
After Vittert responded, “Oh, come on.” McClellan stated, “No, how do you enforce that bill? If you read the bill, the — how do you enforce it?”
Vittert responded, “You know what sex is on someone’s birth certificate. … It’s a completely false talking point.”
McClellan responded, “It is not a false talking point. You don’t want to accept it. We can move on to something else. But the only way to enforce that bill, in many cases, it allowed people in schools to pull children’s pants down to determine what sex they are.”
Dozens of dems and many in the LSMBTGA were given these nonsensical talking points: the demsplaining script du jour.
The Senate vote followed the house: not a single democrat voted for this issue. Now yes, there are show votes from time to time intended to drag and expose an issue for political purposes, including fund raising and campaign ads. But this issue is as big a loser as can be found. From the article:
A national exit poll conducted by the Concerned Women for America legislative action committee found that 70% of moderate voters saw the issue of “Donald Trump’s opposition to transgender boys and men playing girls’ and women’s sports and of transgender boys and men using girls’ and women’s bathrooms” as important to them.
Additionally, 6% said it was the most important issue of all, while 44% said it was “very important.” Meanwhile, a recent New York Times/Ipsos poll found that the vast majority of Americans, including 67% of Democrats, don’t believe trans athletes should be able to compete in women’s sports.
In our polarized political environment, you rarely have issues that break like this: on anything. Far rarer is for politicians-who are the closest thing to human wind vanes imaginable-veritable tetrahedrons-taking up the 20 percent side of an issue that has overwhelming support. It defies logic even for the most political humans in our society.
Many television “experts” on these issues regularly inadvertently and glibly expose themselves as unserious people by spouting inanities that undermine what they say is their belief, while making points that describe the opposite. Like Whoopi explaining about how the lord does not make mistakes (clip by Michael Knowles) it doesn’t mean what she thinks it does….
This point has been discussed quite a bit in the LSMBTGA but seems to have bypassed understanding by those non-believers who feel it best to double-down on this issue, as evidenced in this CNN panel.
As of this morning the dems apparently have determined to “die on this hill.“
What exactly is demsplaining? I should refer to it as LSMBTGAsplaining because of its widespread use by these entities, but that would be embellishing my own made-up acronym. Simply put it is the technique captured in this article and accompanying video: Conservatives flip script on Senate Dems pushing identical talking points against Trump.
Like robots where the talking points and script are flushed out to the choir, and they sing the doowaps in the best traditions established by the lying duet of Obama and Rhodes.
This seems pretty lame when our elected officials demonstrate they are incapable of coming up with their own original viewpoints and words. Far worse is the advisory groups servicing the dems who approved of these efforts.
This was the best they could come up with after their recent strategy soiree. Surveys over time indicate that congress is not very well thought of by the public, which is not a new issue as noted in this article from some 12 years ago. From the piece:
Americans like cockroaches, dog poop, hemorrhoids and toenail fungus more than members of Congress, according to a new survey by Public Policy Polling.
Even dem political pundits are noticing that the party lacks direction, leadership, a strategy and increasingly common sense. But this is a sheeple group of bleating Stepfordites rising to a whole nother level.
Survey results have recently gotten much, much worse. Congress has passed scant few budgets on time in recent decades, and only single digit balanced budgets forever. Their obligation to do the people’s business always seems to take a back seat to these more “pressing issues.”
And-yes-that does indict both sides of the aisle. However, democrats seem to be embracing the suck at unprecedented levels, as evidenced by their performance at the recent Presidential Address.
The dem plank-platform and strategy-appears to have resolved to one consensus issue at this point: oppose anything President Trump does. Much like many other dem issues of the past three decades, this policy engenders a suicide pact which is a litmus test for inclusion.
If you agree to participate in this type of idjiotcy, allowing the dems to drag you down to their level of stupidity (where they will then beat you with experience (Mark Twain,)) you will soon be in maniacal and looney discussions and debates where you will be dragged so far left you can shake hands with the conservative right that the party in theory loathes.
The continued issue of illegals and the border is one of those never-ending debates on which we never seem to make progress. One of the reasons is this continuing madness of conflating immigrants and illegals. An immigrant is an alien, with the sharp distinction being the term “illegal.” Pundits have thrown “migrant” in the mix to add confusion.
This is a classic example by one of the dimmest bulbs in the light fixture. The somewhat crazy part is she seems to agree that we need modifications to current programs and a better system, but-but-but-but:
“My mom and dad moved myself, my sister, and my five brothers to America to find a different opportunity, a better opportunity. We are part of a long line of immigrants who come to this country to make this country stronger and to make this country better, and to live our version of the American dream. We know what happened [Mr. President] over the last four years at our southern border. It was a total and complete disgrace. It’s a disgrace not only because of the unlimited amount of people who came into this country – almost ten million encounters over a four year period – but it’s a disgrace because that’s not how we should be welcoming people to this country.”
Which begs the question-Senator-what’s your idea? And why are you voting against plans to address the problem?
Then there is the relatively recent “Title IX is about sex” discussions, whereas the demsplain narrative paints this lunacy as an issue about “gender:” that is their story in this “nuanced debate.”
See, that is different because-you know-you can’t tell the gender of babies at birth (said no sane person ever,) and it is often-by this “looney logic”- arbitrarily assigned by doctors. If that isn’t goofy enough some states have allowed people to change their birth certificates to match their dysphoric ideas.
Which does not surprise at a time when we have a Supreme Court Justice who does not feel qualified to opine on the definition of a woman, despite being one.
Which is strange considering that the main qualifications for her nomination to the courts was based on her being a woman and being black. It seems at least likely that she had to know something about one or the other or both in order to qualify. Nobody was trying to trick her, like asking her for the definition of a “wookie” or some mythical creature like a Jackalope…
And America has gotten looney toons enough on many of these issues that these type discussions are probably happening somewhere as you read this article.
The recent reaction to the Presidential Address-or any of them in this century-tells you all you need to know about political looney tunes. But it has gotten much, much worse.
Current dem politics dictate-demand-that no matter how good or righteous or popular an idea might be-if it is coming from the enemy-the other side-thou shallst not applaud or clap and thou shallst not stand.
Not even for heart tugging issues that near 99.9% of Americans would support and agree with. Although there was a smattering of applause as reported by this NY Post article, when the President mentioned Ukraine.
This rare outbreak of applause only happened because of the apparently flipped script in regard to this issue that the warmonger Trump-lover of all things Russia-going to get us in all manner of skirmishes around the globe, going to get us into a nuclear war because-you know-that’s the way he is-and Orange Man Bad.
While the historical “peacenicks” on the democrat side are all in for the fighting in Ukraine with no exit strategy, no accountability for American taxpayers who already provided hundreds of billions of dollars, with no accountability or apparent compunction against allowing the killing to continue.
Enough has been said about the democrat response to the President’s Address, even if not everybody has yet said it.
One of the worst aftermath sycophantic Presidential “buffings” came after Biden’s absolutely embarrassing address a year ago where it was honestly painful to watch and hard to work through. Speaker Johnson sitting behind him was working so hard to make sense of it he probably needed heavy doses of Tylenol after the event.
For those who don’t want to remember, the LSMBTGA word of the day was “fiery.” Mine would have been painful or stumblebum or embarrassing. If you can stand to watch it you will see an incredible contrast in style, ability and delivery. The Media Research Center reported on just how over the top the pundits were in praising Biden’s speech at a time when nobody knew he was a dead candidate walking.
The government is at its absolute worst when it undertakes issues based on politically correct narratives that are not even peripherally related to doing the taxpayers’ business. The recent reports of EPA officials DIE and de-gendering efforts are just one example.
The bigger issue emerging since President Trump took office is the deep state attempts to hide such malfeasance via the near manic response of demsplaining to their supporters that is based upon an assumption that they are ignorant-as in lacking information-or just plain stupid.
Emerging cultural folk hero and truthsplainer Scott Jennings is just the man to say the quiet part out loud. The dems believe that people-including those in their own party-are too stupid to understand and embrace the truth-according to them, vice the facts of these issues.
This AOL Article makes exactly that point. Scott Jennings: Americans are sick of Democrats telling them they’re ‘too stupid to understand’ — but the party just can’t stop.
A politician who dismisses the opposition or entire demographics as being too “stupid” or “uneducated” to vote “right” is the definition of a desperate pundit who will not likely be successful. Yet we’ve seen many dems adopt this mantra when making sense of Trump’s popularity, as if it is the result of duping the public.
The response to the Presidential Address is often peppered with such points. For those who listened to it this year, it was stunning to hear Congresswoman Slotkin say that President Trump doesn’t believe in his heart that “America is exceptional:” he does not “really” believe in American Exceptionalism.
This is the party of Barrack Obama, who not only undermined that belief, but went on an apology tour throughout the Middle East during a time it was starting to delaminate, kowtowing and subordinating himself to those leaders.
The picture of him bowing to leaders was dismissed by his fiction writer Rhodes as “a camera effect where he was merely de-emphasizing his height difference.” There were a bunch of Americans who wondered who empowered Obama to apologize on our behalf.
Slotkin is getting roasted on social media for her comments that track with the above takeaway that voters are immature, or our system is (immature-young and therefore) not smart enough to assess the issues and vote “properly,” often code for “did not vote for us.”
It gets worse. During a CNN interview with a democrat congresswoman, it was pointed out-by the CNN host-that the idea of posting congresswoman as “fighters” on TikTok was not a good look: the congresswoman was unable to see the problem.
Not only that, she also enumerated a number of her truths that expose how they are suddenly holding President Trump to a standard that was never applied in the past four years, expecting Trump to turn things like the economy around on day one. Jenning’s response was epic: “Dumbest thing I’ve ever seen”: Scott Jennings confronts Dem congresswoman.
The surprising part about many of Jenning’s highlight reels is he is often the lone voice of sanity and the CNN pundits that he jousts with consistently defend the indefensible and look silly and loonacidal. And as he has stated, “they just keep digging.”
The reaction to this strategy void on the part of the dems is not being helped by the LSMBTGA. Many of these issues are just total losers, so they must be spun and rebranded and repackaged in novel and inventive ways.
In Colorado, Denver-led by looney mayors who have often been rewarded and promoted as governors and congressmembers-have been focused on eliminating the “homeless” problem for decades. Billions of dollars have been spent, and it has simply encouraged and attracted more homeless people each year.
How can the LSMBTGA help? How about this idea-Media Tries To Define Homelessness as Urban Camping…from the piece:
As Kentucky makes urban camping a crime, ‘homeless court’ seeks to avoid punishment – Reuters.
It’s not ‘camping’. Going to the woods and putting up a tent is camping. Setting up a tent on Wilshire Blvd or Fifth Avenue is squatting at best.
How about this great idea: Washington Democrats Push Bill to Free Murderers and Pay Their Rent.
California has been busy working overtime on great ideas. In light of the tragic fires that occurred, you will never guess the solution lawmakers came up with: banning private fire fighters from using public fire hydrants…that will teach them…
In the midst of fighting these fires the legislature had time in their slow schedule to come up with an opposition operation against Trump, with robust funding for lawfare that includes funding for lawsuits for “immigrants.”
Of course, immigrants that enter this country are often on work Visas and are required to provide plans and details regarding how they will support themselves and not be or become a burden on taxpayers, which would result in their expulsion. By definition, immigrants do not need such help, but Illegal Aliens and migrants: not so much.
It is not lost on the public that there are better uses for that money than opposing Trump.
There is an effort by the governor in Washington State to redefine mother as part of a drive for gender affirming language. Because “inseminated person” simply has a much better ring to it. The governor defended his support:
Evers defended his proposal while speaking at an event in Wausau, Wisconsin, on Monday. “What we want is legal certainty that moms will be able to get the care they need,” he said. “That’s it, end of story.”
This is what demsplaining is all about. Imagine how much deep thought must have gone into this issue to come up with the only apparent workable solution to getting moms-the “inseminated person”- the care they need.
Some of the absolute worst demsplaining efforts have been on DOGE, the economy, Ukraine, illegal aliens and the border, and President Trump’s cabinet picks. The hysterical is now the norm and will be until the democrats either get their way or-well-never mind-that’s it!
The demsplaining is not going to stop until voters and supporters make them. That ship is not coming into port anytime soon…
13 March 2025
LSMBTGA: Lamestream media echo chamber (LMEC-L) social media (SM) big tech tyrants (BT,) government (G) and academia (A)
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA