A while back, I made the argument for splitting the country into three separate nations. Now, let’s start to consider how this could come to pass.
First, I like the idea of the Red States forming a Coalition of Free States – a union within the Union. We’ve already seen Sanctuary Cities and 2nd Amendment Counties beginning to identify themselves throughout the country. Taking that a step further, would be for state legislatures and governors to declare that they are a Free State and to form a group of states with similar goals that can support each other. From this loose, but formal, coalition, it would be easy to begin to pass legislation that would encourage reciprocity with those states and inhibit it with the non-coalition states. This would begin to encourage freedom of movement and business between the coalition states and discourage it with non-coalition states. This could also help Conservative states like Texas deal with the influx of Liberals fleeing the Blue state abyss by adding more stringent requirements to the new residents – perhaps encouraging them to move to the opposite coast instead of a coalition state.
Further, just like with lawsuits entered jointly by multiple attorneys general, these states could work to lessen federal overreach into their states and defend each other from both federal and liberal threats. For example, when the NCAA threatened to pull all their sports games from states that oppose men participating in women’s sports, this coalition could have refused to hold sporting events in all the other coalition states in solidarity with the state being threatened. Or, even better, they could start their own athletic association and cut the NCAA’s influence in half. So much could be accomplished with a strong Conservative Coalition of States. So much so, that regardless of splitting the country into smaller countries or not, this coalition needs to exist.
Second, we need to start the process of getting the “split” on the ballot. This couldn’t be a state-by-state issue but would need to be nationwide. We don’t want part of the country to “secede” we want the country to agree to disband the “United” part of the United States of America. This could best be accomplished by an alliance between a Conservative advocacy group and a Liberal advocacy group – the only thing we would agree on. Both groups, working together could rally a majority of Americans to support a peaceful splitting of the nation. There are already liberal groups that strongly support splitting from the conservative sections of the country. The honest truth is, we all just want to live our lives in a country that upholds what we believe is important for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Liberals want that too – they just want liberty from morality and their happiness may look more like licentiousness to us. But the point is, if they aren’t forcing us to condone their lifestyles and their proclivities are safely distanced from influencing our children – who cares? Do we care what Europeans do? But, by sharing the same country, the same laws and courts, inevitably we are being influenced by their beliefs, or lack thereof.
Do you know what the catalyst was for the Pilgrims to endanger their lives by crossing a tumultuous ocean and settling an unknown land? We always say it was religious freedom but that isn’t exactly accurate. The Pilgrim left England for religious freedom. They went to the Netherlands first, where they did find religious freedom and could have stayed there, freely practicing their religion, indefinitely. But the reason they left the Netherlands for America was to protect their children from the influences of the secular culture they were living in. They felt that they would lose their children to secularism and that was worth their very lives.
Now, we do not have an unknown land to settle (unless you count Mars – which I don’t!) so we can’t sail away from the secular influences affecting our children. So, the next best thing is to send those influences away from us. Splitting into different countries is the best way to peacefully accomplish that goal.
If protecting their children from being lost to a secular culture was enough reason for the Pilgrims to put their lives in danger, then, surely, we can work to get a vote put on the ballot for the same reason.
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: AFNN_USA
The Pilgrims did not want religious freedom per se. They wanted the ability to inflict their version of religion on others. Rhode Island was formed by people fleeing the religious tyranny of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.