I wrote two more articles on this series after I completed what I originally intended as a message that the LGBTQ+ community, aka, the letter people, were targeting your children and grandchildren by leveraging their positions on city, town and county school boards, the teacher’s union and teachers themselves to inflict their dogma on your children. Far from some altruistic or innocent attempt to educate or help children, these attempts increasingly constitute sophisticated propaganda campaigns or military information operations that disingenuously take advantage of the natural ambiguity associated with puberty and injects a letter people bias to the educational process to normalize the culture they want to inflict on the ~97% of the population that had not previously identified as a letter person.
I state it that way specifically because as I wrote about in the series, the effectiveness of this technique (and we should acknowledge that this propaganda effort is approached with all the seriousness and dogma of an actual military or political effort, so it is somewhat of a system being replicated and propagated and more appropriately like tactics, techniques and procedures-TTP) has resulted in a significant uptick in the percentage of successive generations identification as letter people, leaping to nearly 6% of millennials and nearly 16% of gen Z.
The point of my article series was that you need to educate yourself on what they are doing and engage with your kids with knowledge aforethought to debunk the happy talk, myths, rainbow-unicorns-happily ever after talk being marketed to your kids to counter this propaganda that has none of the consequences and facts about some of these decision options being presented to kids who are too young to understand the ramifications or options-that they are also not being given.
The bulk of this particular article was to provide proof-Dan Bongino’s “the deets” or the details and facts associated with the specific way some of these aberrant letter people groomers are going about their business-with most parents none the wiser. Not because they are bad or inattentive, but because these most often teachers or administrators are doing these actions surreptitiously and deliberately masking their efforts and keeping under the radar in ways that avoid reporting and accountability for their actions.
If we were having a different discussion about the above actions, we would be describing legal definitions of actions and methodologies found in most court proceedings involving predatory pedophiles and child abusers.
I wanted to add a few recent headlines of note that bolster many of the points of this series, and let the bulk of my original tale place in context why these things matter.
There has been an unbelievable uptick in many things in America over the last several years, but no topic has been as prolifically covered by the LSMBTG* as the “plight” (dangerous tongue in cheek stab) of the letter people. The more they out themselves to tell us who they are-and the vast majority of American’s simply don’t care to know-making their life choices an issue on the table in many cases, inappropriately bringing such issues to work, school-daily life-places where no good can come from forcing and inflicting discussions on the unwitting, in what I termed in another series the “Robert Conrad battery commercial” approach-“go ahead, knock it off my shoulder, I dare you” (well Robert, why did you put it on your shoulder and invite me to do it???)-the more most of us realize how unsavory this discussion is becoming.
There is a reason for it, as this Federalist article points out, making the case-and my point in my series-that these are not my mom and dad’s letter people who just wanted recognition, tolerance and love: “Long gone are the days of gay pride as a movement that claims it’s for inclusion, acceptance, and self-esteem.”
Right on cue we were served up two sterling exemplars of what has changed in the dynamic. One is the idea that you must celebrate the letter people lifestyle choices-else be canceled as evidenced by Major League Baseball’s effort to do something for Pride Month (an entire month dedicated to less than 5% of us but I digress.) And who can blame them for trying to keep up with social justice warriors and the US government-our elected representatives-who designated it so-arguably obscuring and detracting from the memory of D-Day and the legacy of the greatest generation of American’s effort to turn the tide against the Nazis in World War II.
This article touches on how these issues are being introduced in places where only badness can result, as people are forced to go beyond tolerance-grudging or otherwise-but the reality becomes clear that despite our rights to have and speak and state our opinions, the left only supports that concept to the limit of the things they agree with: otherwise-no rights or opinions for you.
Similarly down in good old Dallas, Texas some decided to take this library Drag Queen stuff to the next level by hosting an event at a gay bar (why would anybody open a bar focused on such a small demographic but I digress-and again, aren’t bars generally restricted to drinking age?) Now the backlash has been immediate and predictable from both sides “Yes, Real Men Still Exist”.
And right on cue, much like the case during the Trump years, it is uncanny, surprising and astounding how people just willingly step into the spotlight to identify their biases and trigger items—in this case that you must be supportive, not just tolerant and rub it in your face-quick to go on the offense because of their positions-confirming all the beliefs and prejudices the letter people have accused us of having all these years-to stake out a position and ensure we understand they are not just lawmakers, but they are letter people defending and promoting the concept. Which is the light through which you should read this story and the below.
The letter people have arrived in positions and they no longer seek tolerance or simply grudging recognition-those goal posts were removed and replaced initially with rainbow colors and now some aberrant, tortuous all-inclusive flag narrative that brings race under the table like some kabuki logic effort to gain legitimacy from traffickers in racist jargon and propaganda: confusing the formerly settled list that said you can’t pick your parents or your race, but you can pick your gender despite what biology tells us. Of course, you can pick your nose, but you can’t tune a fish.
My original article about this astounding self-outing is below.
Acts born out of desperation are by their very nature extreme. Most know intuitively not to trap or corner a wounded animal, not to pet Jake (the snake-Army talk-no double entendre here) and as best described by Jim Croce, “you don’t mess around with Slim.”
Slim is increasingly parents, grandparents, school officials and administrators who sense and see that things are “rotten” in the teacher’s union and their empowerment of activist teachers hellbent on propagandizing kids with leftist dogma on gender, race and politics that have no business or place in the classroom. The left is terrible at governance, making sense, achieving success-there is no place on earth where happiness reigns under socialism or leftist tenets. What they are good at is messaging and communications. It helps to have either zero or fungible ethics and morals that can be weasel worded and made malleable to justify the means, the ends, and everything in between necessary to get their way. In many places they have tipped their hands through their cocksure actions and aberrant, borderline illegal activities that fly in the face of decorum and what parents believe should be the community norm for education and learning in the classroom.
When called out on these activities-while masking or hiding their actions, changing terminology away from clear language to obfuscate the truth, wrapping themselves behind school board actions, legalese and process-many community school administrators, board officials and Superintendents are going on the offensive through use of local security and the federal government (New York, Texas, Virginia, Georgia, Texas, Texas, Arizona, North Carolina, New York, RI…)
They are willing to do battle with their bosses-taxpayers, parents and community groups-to press their agenda at all costs while ignoring parents: they know better what children need-and it’s far afield from what most believe is appropriate for the classroom. Slim-parents-are becoming acutely aware that these troglodytes are battling parents wishes and desires-with parents-taxpayers-money and resources: therein lies the basis of a strategy to overcome these efforts.
In an earlier article of this series I whimsically referred to “going there” with regard to one of the leftist, socialist attack dog points often trotted out as a defensive mechanism to cut off rational debate against the indefensible. The gist of the tactic is that many who oppose clear-headed thinking related to these topics (e.g., race, gender, politics) retreat to a tried-and-true tactic at discrediting and touting as paranoia-or propaganda-whenever the topic comes up about the above-but particularly LGBTQ+ (hereinafter referred to as letter people) practitioners or supporters doing a form of recruitment and indoctrination targeted at younger and more vulnerable targets as they conspire to make the movement more mainstream. Of course-to hold or express such thoughts is the definition of paranoia, homophobic tendencies and out of the mainstream beliefs-isn’t it? That is the “Alinsky” attack dog approach that has been very effective for a long time now in this disingenuous dialogue with the left intended to keep the average citizen off balance.
So what a surprise it was to read this article where California teacher’s admitted to exactly what “paranoid” and concerned parents and conservatives had been accused of believing was taking place all along: but, but, but they cried, “it’s a conspiracy theory.” Only it’s not! This information came from member discussions at an October California Teacher’s Union meeting-an LGBTQ+ Issues Conference titled “Beyond the Binary: Identity and Imagining Possibilities.” Some attendees provided recordings of the discussions and presentations.
“Speakers went so far as to tout their surveillance of students’ Google searches, internet activity, and hallway conversations in order to target sixth graders for personal invitations to LGBTQ clubs, while actively concealing these clubs’ membership rolls from participants’ parents,” Abigail Shrier reported on Thursday.
Some of the more radical members were proud, boastful and quite clear in communicating the strategy for their efforts, some of their tactics, techniques and procedures (in the military our TTP,) and their utter disdain and disregard for the concerns-or authority-of parents.
Multiple seminars at the conference encouraged hosting LGBT clubs for middle schoolers. An audio clip reveals teacher Lori Caldeira explaining why such clubs keep no rosters, noting, “Sometimes we don’t really want to keep records because if parents get upset that their kids are coming? We’re like, ‘Yeah, I don’t know. Maybe they came?’ You know, we would never want a kid to get in trouble for attending if their parents are upset.”
She has no issue with blatantly disregarding parental desires nor scheming to put the student in a position where she has done so-she just does not want to be accountable for the backlash. The teachers who are colluding to use subtle propaganda techniques on our children-most of whom are at an age where parents do not want them exposed to any sexually related information or material-particularly dogmatic propaganda deliberately inflicted upon them to influence their thoughts, beliefs and tolerance for concepts they are too young to assimilate and process properly-are no different than hucksters, fraudsters, groomers and deviants that the mainstream left is scheming to justify to propagate these messages.
At the CTA conference, Caldeira and another teacher, Kelly Baraki, led an additional seminar about “How we run a ‘GSA’ [Gay-Straight Alliance club] in Conservative Communities,” and discussed their strategies for how to “get the bodies in the door” and ensure kids keep coming back when “we saw our membership numbers start to decline.”
“When we were doing our virtual learning – we totally stalked what they were doing on Google, when they weren’t doing school work. One of them was googling ‘Trans Day of Visibility.’ And we’re like ‘check.’ We’re going to invite that kid when we get back on campus,” Baraki admitted. “Whenever they follow the Google Doodle links or whatever, right, we make note of those kids and the things that they bring up with each other in chats or email or whatever.”
Caldeira also acknowledged that she leverages her role of running morning announcements to further push LGBT ideology on children and their families.
“I’m the one who controls the messaging. Everybody says, ‘Oh, Ms. Caldeira, you’re so sweet, you volunteered to do that.’ Of course I’m so sweet that I volunteered to do that. Because then I control the information that goes home,” she says in one of the recordings. “And for the first time, this year, students have been allowed to put openly LGBT content into our morning announcement slides.”
These teachers have time to monitor what the kids are doing on social media to leverage that knowledge to entice them to attend their letter agenda recruitment sessions. That strikes me as a bit nefarious and not what I would think-or want-my child’s teacher to be doing. There is something sneaky and distasteful-ethics and morals wise-in any adult who interacts with kids who is scheming ways to get a child to do something they might not otherwise do without undue influence: isn’t there? That is not the type of teaching and mentoring one would hope to have ongoing at schools. It gets worse:
After Baraki and Caldeira angered parents by using an “anti-bullying” presentation to teach kids what it means to be gay or lesbian, they explained to conference attendees that “Next year, we’re going to do just a little mind-trick on our sixth graders.”
“They were last to go through this presentation and the gender stuff was the last thing we talked about. So next year, they’ll be going first with this presentation and the gender stuff will be the first thing they are about. Hopefully to mitigate, you know, these kind of responses, right?” Baraki continued.
She highlighted the objection of one mom who had hoped to wait before having to talk with her middle school student about sex and gender “identities,” before ridiculing the parent’s reaction.
“I know, so sad, right? Sorry for you, you had to do something hard! Honestly, your twelve-year-old probably knew all that, right?” Baraki said in the leaked conference recording, according to Shrier. She also called it a “win” that another objecting parent had been encouraged to move their child to a private school before boasting that “I have tenure! You can’t fire me for running a GSA. And so, you can be mad, but you can’t fire me for it.”
What would we normally consider somebody who is (1) an adult (2) talking to kids about sex (gender) (3) without parental permission (or a discussion) (4) proceeding notwithstanding they know parents would likely disapprove (5) with material that has not been vetted through the normal processes (6) and doing it surreptitiously to avoid accountability?
Normal people would likely believe that such a description meets the definition for a “groomer”, pedophile, sexual deviant or aberrant adult who needs to be watched and monitored and not allowed around children unsupervised. Change the circumstances just a tad and we would be describing a sexual predator that parents and teachers alike would normally agree needs to register with the police when they move into your community-kept a legal distance away from schools-maybe outfitted with an ankle bracelet.
With the current out of control dogma ongoing with the schools-and politics in general-this is either somewhat mind-blowing, shocking information-that entered social media just like any other story or tidbit or infogram-or what we thought was going on in the first place-so, ho-hum! And, yes, people are busy with their daily lives, there is a new strain of (yawn) COVID that has been found to be able to get through steel vaults and is being spread by flies and mosquitos, lions and tigers and bears (oh my!)
Who gives a damn about either side’s propaganda or beliefs or spin or anything: you have teachers who are deliberately targeting vulnerable kids to expose them to sexual, gender based dogma knowingly against the desires of parents, guardians and caretakers: and flaunting it. The school district has responded by condemning these efforts, particularly teachers who were monitoring student’s internet use to target them for gender propaganda. But where were school officials when this was playing out? Is this the type of educational strategy that parents would support the Teacher’s Union bringing mainstream as curriculum?
The worst aspect of this story is this aberrant-and likely criminal teacher-who is well aware of parent’s desires to defer the topic of sexual education until her twelve-year-old is older and more mature. Yet she mocks those views and takes apparent glee in providing information and influence that she is obviously aware that parent’s do not want for their children-yet she thinks she knows better or feels like she has the authority to do whatever the hell she wants to—which is somewhat the definition of hubris-but seems destined to end with a lawsuit when you consider who has the responsibility for raising children: its not these aberrant, cocksure, disingenuous teachers. Review again this teacher’s commentary reference the parent’s desire:
“I know, so sad, right? Sorry for you, you had to do something hard! Honestly, your twelve-year-old probably knew all that, right?” Baraki said in the leaked conference recording, according to Shrier. She also called it a “win” that another objecting parent had been encouraged to move their child to a private school before boasting that “I have tenure! You can’t fire me for running a GSA. And so, you can be mad, but you can’t fire me for it.”
Meanwhile more and more medical information is coming out about the deleterious and adverse-long term and permanent damage-done by “gender” medicine and treatment, particularly puberty blockers (here) and hormone therapy administered to young and unsuspecting kids who are otherwise not old enough to drink, drive, vote-and some would argue-think straight. These kids should be receiving some form of informed therapy as a first step in the worst cases-not pronoun information or indoctrination by these teachers. One can argue they are too young to receive medical research, study results, reports on the deleterious effects to both physical and mental health from these processes and procedures that are often being discussed without any parental involvement. But that is not stopping these zealots and borderline deviants sanctioned in our school system from finding ways to communicate the message about “gender options.”
To be clear, I’m not advocating having these discussions with children who simply lack the maturity and judgement to assimilate this information. Not because we don’t love them or care about them, but it is also why they can’t vote, drink alcohol, drive, buy weapons, smoke, join the military or Foreign Legion-stay up past 2100/9PM-you know-do grownup things, because they are children and under the care of a parent or guardian who cares for them and protects them from such things. But these dialogues are not and can’t take place, because, well, you are a bigot and homophobic.
This article asks some questions about the messaging and dialogue on this topic which expose just how aberrant, perverted and propaganda driven this topic has become. Does such behavior engender dangerous risk taking causing lifelong health problems and early death? Why have the teacher’s unions (in general) and some teachers decided to present only the happy-talk, one sided unicorn and rainbow version of the story, while disregarding-in fact, attacking any and all who provide- the deleterious mental health, social wellbeing aspects of the full story?
9 June 2022
LSMBTG: Lamestream media echo chamber (LMEC-L) social media (SM) big tech tyrants (BT) and government (G)
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: AFNN_USA
4 thoughts on “Pass the Decoder Ring (Part 6)”