European Medicines Agency Reverses Course on COVID-19 Boosters

The European Medicines Agency, the EU’s drug regulator, “expressed doubt” on whether a fourth dose of the COVID-19 booster should be administered, according to Reuters. 

At a Tuesday press conference, the EMA’s Head of Vaccines Strategy, Marco Cavaleri, “raised concerns that a strategy of giving boosters every four months hypothetically poses the risk of overloading people’s immune systems and leading to fatigue in the population,” the report said.

Cavaleri warned that “repeated vaccinations within short intervals would not represent a sustainable long-term strategy.”

Boosters “can be done once, or maybe twice, but it’s not something that we can think should be repeated constantly,” he added.

Bloomberg’s headline for this story read: “Repeat Booster Shots Spur European Warning on Immune-System Risks.”

And Fortune’s: “Europe’s drug regulator warns excessive COVID boosters could lead to ‘problems with immune response,’ joining WHO in pushback.” (Emphasis mine.)

The lede reads: “Here’s another influential voice joining the growing pushback against overdoing it on the COVID booster front: the European Medicines Agency (EMA).”

[Note: Quality of EMA video is not great.]

 

 

Former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson, who went all COVID-19 all the time when the pandemic began, finds this latest development to be alarming, as I’m sure many of us do.

Berenson tells readers on his Substack website, Unreported Truths: “This should terrify you if you’ve received an mRNA booster. Last month, the European Medicines Agency authorized boosters EVERY THREE MONTHS.” He cites a Dec. 9 article from Reuters entitled, “EU drugs regulator says data supports vaccine boosters after three months.”

A booster is not currently required to be considered “fully vaxxed” by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but the agency’s director, Rochelle Walensky, told CNBC’s Shepard Smith three weeks ago, “We’re examining this definition, of course, but what I want to be very clear about is that CDC recommendations for right now say that everyone who is over the age of 18, when they become eligible should get their booster shot.” 

One of the reader comments to Berenson’s post was spot on: “I find it so amusing when I hear claims that ‘anti-vaxxers’ are being influenced by ‘misinformation.’ As if we have any reason at all to take the FDA at its word. They’re far from infallible under the best of circumstances. Anyone else remember Fen-Phen? Seldane? Vioxx? All tested under normal conditions and FDA approved. All pulled due to dangerous, unforeseen side-effects. … Why in the hell would I take experimental shots that were developed at ‘warp speed?’ Nope.”

So, the Biden Administration has declared a mandate on a drug that even the World Health Organization has reservations about. 

The WHO issued a statement on Tuesday which read in part, “A vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.”

In the meantime, the Supreme Court deliberates on the constitutionality of the government forcing Americans to either inject these experimental vaccines into their bodies or lose their jobs. 

What in the world is there to even think about? 

 

Follow AFNN
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAz…
Twitter: @AFNNUSA
GETTR: @AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA
Patriot.Online: @AFNN
Please follow me on Twitter.