Did Complacency Almost Get Donald Trump Killed — Twice?

On January 27, 1967, a freak accident during a routine test killed astronauts Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee. At the conclusion of the investigation, fellow astronaut Frank Borman testified to Congress that his friends were killed by a “failure of imagination.” As he said, nobody – including himself – imagined that a test of the capsule, performed on the ground, could be so catastrophic.

We heard the “failure of imagination” phrase again last month, when acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe testified about the assassination attempt on former President Donld Trump. He said that the Secret Service’s performance on July 13th amounted to

A failure on multiple levels, including a failure of imagination and a failure to challenge our assumptions.

I wonder if Acting Director Rowe realized that “failure of imagination” is the most damning admission possible for his agency. The mission of the Secret Service is to anticipate and mitigate threats to their protectees. If an agent can’t imagine that an assailant could attack with a rifle from 120 yards away, said agent lacks the imagination to be in any branch of law enforcement – especially the Secret Service. Yet Rowe admitted under oath, that the imagination problem was at all levels of his agency.

The calamity of errors on July 13th is so unimaginable, it has invited speculation of deep state conspiracies from the “Epstein didn’t hang himself” crowd. Given our government’s behavior of the past 10 years, who can blame them.

The FBI and CIA attempted to remove a duly elected President with a hoax they called an “insurance policy.” That is a fact, not a theory. The DoJ attempted to imprison Donald Trump for acts protected by the Constitution. That is a fact, not a theory. Democrat operatives in various states attempted to remove Trump from the Presidential ballot, based on opinions about his motives on January 6. That too is a fact. Congressman Bennie Tompson (D, MS) is trying to legislatively remove Donald Trump’s Secret Service protection. That he is doing so is a fact. We can only speculate what his motive is. Given all the above, it’s not much of a leap to question whether the same people that solicited some unstable patsies to kidnap Governor Gretchin Whitmer, might have solicited an unstable patsy to take a shot at Donald Trump.

However, despite our government’s recent history of conspiracies and dirty tricks (which have all failed), I think Hanlon’s Razor should be our guide.

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.

Given that the federal government’s only demonstrated competency is being a pain in our backsides, I’m inclined to suspect that the Secret Service is not an exception to the rule.

However, there is more than one type of incompetence. There is the incompetence of lacking the expertise to do one’s job – the agent that doesn’t know that an assailant with a rifle could be a threat. There is also the incompetence of complacency – the agent that assumes nobody will attack with a rifle, because it hasn’t happened recently. The incompetence of complacency happens when one stops trying to out-think (or out-imagine) their adversaries because the job has become routine. Is it possible that agents wear the dark shades, and pose menacingly for the crowds, but fail to imagine what could go wrong because nothing hardly ever goes wrong? I would dare say that few in the Secret Service were even born, the last time a President was attacked with a rifle. Is that why they didn’t imagine it could happen?

Complacency is perhaps the most dangerous form of incompetence. It allows an expert to deceive himself with a belief in his on infallibility. Such a person no longer imagines that they could be making a mistake, or that an adversary could be cleverer than they. That’s when our subconscious has an oversized voice in our decision making. The choices of the complacent begin reflecting their biases – laziness, disgust, unhappiness, hostility, superiority … whatever. The complacent rationalize bad decisions with “It will be okay.”

Is there any reason to believe that the Secret Service – the institution, not all individual agents – is the one federal agency not hoping that Donald Trump fails to return to office? Could that bias subconsciously affect the choices of complacent decision makers within its ranks?

Donald Trump’s protective detail repeatedly requested more resources. Perhaps the agency’s decision makers rationalized denying that request by thinking: Trump’s current detail has managed okay so far. Request denied. It will be okay.

When First Lady Jill Biden required protection in the same state as Donald Trump, the agency’s leadership pulled agents from Trump’s detail. Maybe they thought: We’ll backfill with people from other agencies. They’ve got necessary badges and dark suits too. It will be okay.

We now know that Acting Director Rowe made cuts to the Secret Service’s Counter Surveillance Division (CSD) – the group that does site threat assessments. We also know that CSD was not present, and did not do a threat assessment at Butler, PA. I can imagine the rationale: This rally is no different than any other Trump rally. It doesn’t need a unique threat assessment. It will be okay.

We’ve learned that law enforcement wasn’t on the roof that the sniper used because it was too hot. The leadership at the event must have thought: If the roof’s too hot for us, it will be too hot for an assassin too. Besides, there are a few local cops over there. They’ll let us know if they see anything sketchy. It will be okay.

Does any of that seem more plausible than: the Secret Service doesn’t know the effective range of a rifle, or that the government tried to kill Donald Trump?

But I must admit, when the DoJ inexplicably released a letter from the most recent assassin wannabe offering a bounty on the Donald, I too was tempted to buy into the “they’re trying to kill Trump” conspiracy theories. Then I read this article on Powerline.

Two weeks ago, Tim Walz attended a funeral for an acquaintance in Northern Minnesota. He arrived with his protective detail after people had begun taking their seats in the church. The Secret Service agents checked new arrivals with a metal detector, but never checked the people who were already seated in the church. That’s a rather gaping failure of imagination, no? We now know that at least one attendee at the funeral possessed a carry permit and was armed while seated in the same room with a Vice-Presidential candidate. I don’t for one second think that there is a deep state conspiracy to get Comrade Walz killed. It was total incompetence.

Therefore, I conclude that Hanlon’s Razor remains a valid explanation. Our federal government is no longer capable of doing anything well. Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, and all of their minions may be happy to see Donald Trump murdered — but none of them are actually competent enough to execute such a grand conspiracy.

Author Bio: John Green is a retired engineer and political refugee from Minnesota, now residing in Idaho. He spent his career designing complex defense systems, developing high performance organizations, and doing corporate strategic planning. He is a contributor to American ThinkerThe American Spectator, and the American Free News Network. He can be reached at greenjeg@gmail.com.

If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.

Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA

 

1 thought on “Did Complacency Almost Get Donald Trump Killed — Twice?”

  1. I think it was less Complacency and more Malignant Neglect. The ONLY two things that went right at Butler were Principal Survived and Perp Didn’t Escape, and one would expect even simple incompetence to score better than that.

    Back in college I ran with a couple retired Secret Service guys while I was protecting The Ex from her stalker, and they told me “if the other guy merely shows up it means we ALREADY failed in our primary mission of deterrence.”

Leave a Comment