Hey, Looky Here, It’s Dominion’s Dr. Eric Coomer Again
(I apologize up front in that I am pretty much burying the schadenfreudish lede here. If you just want to view the glorious, splendiferous video, c’est ici watch the video.)
The longer you are in this life the more you realize what a best practice it is not to celebrate the sufferings of others lest the worm turn and catch you looking for the sympathy magnet for yourself. I asked this question about justice in this series, like where is it?
A person is caught dead to rights-the courts take action-decide they have suffered enough-slap on the wrist (talking about you, Clinesmith-and here is an unusual in article test: anybody out in dear readers ville trying to remember where you first heard the name of FISA Court judge James Boasberg, Obama appointee, named by Justice Roberts to the FISA Court? This guy...)
Whereas other cooperating but apparently dangerous near octogenarians get the pre-dawn door knockdown SWAT-like mafioso-terrorist treatment, tipped to the LSMBTGA for maximum coverage.
However, on very rare occasions there is a self-inflicted wound for the guilty among us that is so glorious, ironic and justice delayed that it must be pointed out-talked about-enjoyed. Particularly when the incident is captured on police video and shows the perpetrator in all their splendiferous weaselry for all to see: schadenfreude is a wonderful thing. And it validates what we believed all along. But otherwise-no soup!
I did add a little tongue in cheek humor when I updated the Election Irregularities series back in mid-Oct 2021 (Part 7,) observations based on watching Dr. Eric Coomer in Dominion Voting Systems (DVS) videos. What a lying dog, crap weasel he came across as, right up to the time he was deposed in Denver by attorney Sidney Powell. Coomer showed that-notwithstanding all the “gentleman doth protest too much” behavior, plus all the water carried on his behalf by the LSMBTGA and the painting of everything as a conspiracy theory, it was all nonsense.
His story delaminated-as often happens to these lying dogs-when he had a chance to tell his story under oath. He recanted and took it all back: Snopes would no doubt say that while he did admit to saying all those hateful things, it was “lacking context” and more nuanced than that simple observation…
Coomer was that guy, he told those lies repeatedly and did those things, expressed no remorse and is the poster child-“sorry to get caught”-kind of dirtbag. The most noteworthy commentary was the infamous anti-DJT ANTIFA group teleconference, where he said-per the piece:
According to Oltmann one participant on the conference call asked, “What are we gonna do if f—king Trump wins?” Oltmann, paraphrasing Coomer’s purported response, indicated that Coomer said, “Don’t worry about the election, Trump’s not gonna win. I made f—king sure of that!”
Now if that were you, me, Joe poop the rag man or the UPS delivery guy-Mike-who cares? But coming from the Dominion Voting System (DVS) Executive credited with many of the technical innovations and improvements to the tabulation machines and software, the doctor who holds many of the patents on the machines, this was questionable and disqualifying behavior. Dominion Staff was described by many observers as “the key personnel overseeing the tabulation process.”
If we’ve learned anything about the nature of the Dominion voting machines based on reports from a number of states-including Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Colorado, Pennsylvania, and others, as well as the assessment done by Texas (earlier in this series) when they decided not to buy the machines, the bulk of the administration of the election was by necessity done by Dominion contract personnel because of the complex nature of the machines.
This teleconference took place mere weeks before early mail-in voting was to start in Colorado. In fact, the Soro’s sponsored Colorado Secretary of State (SOS) Gena Griswold was about to launch 4.6M mail-in ballots to Colorado registered voters-some 102% of the eligible voter population in the state according to Judicial Watch (40 of 64 counties over 100% of eligible voters)-when it seems like there couldn’t possibly be more than 3.7 million according to the states own figures (officially reported as 5.6 million citizens, -1.9 million kids in the homes listed under 18-ineligible to vote, would yield a maximum of 3.7 million eligible voters, and if 87% voted the turnout would be ~3.2 million or so, which is close to the ~3.3 million or so that actually voted. Because wouldn’t 87% voter turnout equal ~4 million votes-of the 4.6 million mailed out by the SOS???)
Rather than reword to improve my original discussion of how the Dominion machines were leveraged to steal the election, this is the summary I arrived at in Part 6 of this series:
The anomalies I listed in Part 2 of this series points to software manipulation of key races and issues and only one solution fits the bill to accomplish such a massive volume of ballots: the DVS adjudication process-and that’s not to say DVS did the dirty deed, as they would not have been authorized to decision adjudications: but the machines could certainly generate the opportunities.
No amount of talking or writing about this process is going to shed light on or resolve whether the final vote tally was just the way the cookie crumbed, or truly the product of “anomalies,” without getting to the bottom of the who, what, where, when, why, and how (5Ws and H) these processes unfolded. I’ve touched upon what I believe to be the main culprit in this election and will state it again at the risk of belaboring-again-how I believe this happened.
The Colorado Secretary of State (SOS) undertook an effort to increase voter participation by mailing ballots to all 4.6 million registered Colorado voters 18-22 days before the election. The vast majority of these ballots (nearly 80%) were returned via drop boxes.
According to Ballotpedia, these ballots can be opened and entered into the system upon receipt. In Colorado an entity of or sanctioned by the SOS was scanning these ballots into the system (which I assume was DVS,) performed an action to decrement them from the official Consolidated/Central Voter Registry/File (CVR/F,) processed and sent mail reminders throughout the election window to notify those who had not returned a ballot that there was still time to vote.
Whoever did this processing had access to a valuable list of names of those who had not yet voted. This information could easily have been used to build an M&S projection of how the election was going (rough approximation) and who needed how many votes simply by doing running totals as the ballots entered the system.
So the SOS-aided by the DVS-had running totals building toward election day, as well as access to a list of those who had not yet voted. To repeat an earlier point, ballots were mailed to 4.6 million names and at least ~3.25 million voted in the presidential election, some ~400K more than voted in the 2018 election and ~600K more than in 2016. Also, 660K voters registered as Unaffiliated voters.
I could hypothesize-and I have-a number of ways there could have been shenanigans within the DVS process to elevate the names of those yet to return ballots into the system (simply by turning the voter reminder list into candidate ballots) that would be processed within the system, flagged for adjudication (since they were blank) and then dispositioned.
Does that mean that potentially 1.4 million votes were handled this way? Who knows: that would have provided way more numbers than necessary, but enough to cover the “belt and suspenders” approach of anyone determined to find the win. But is that a possibility? What would stop somebody from doing just that?
The only way to get to the bottom of some of these hypothesized outcomes is an audit: not a sample of ballots, or the so-called “Risk Limiting Audit,” which I’ve likened to a bank counting machine processing 100 dollar bills-coming up with the right number each time, but unable to determine a real one from a forgery. An actual audit of all ballots that could confirm that Colorado is indeed the leading voting Mecca in the land, that we actually had an 87% turnout rate and accomplished the majority of all of it through the less costly methodology of the overwhelming number of ballots submitted by mail. With an incredibly low ballot rejection rate-some ~11K ballots.
I would advocate looking at only two races-the president and senatorial, as well as the ballot initiative regarding the need to be a US citizen to vote in Colorado-and maybe the electoral college initiative. I realize this ends up being big numbers, but if I’ve belabored anything in this series it is the ease with which these machines can handled these trivial numbers.
The same CVR used to send mail reminders to those who had not yet voted could be used to send coded email or post-card questions or web access passcodes soliciting who they voted for in the two federal races. The beauty of doing this via the same mechanism (particularly if DVS) is it would be just as easy as sending the reminders in the first place (a simple task for the aforementioned Microsoft Sequel Server Database.)
To summarize what I spent a lot of words on-the SOS sent out 4.6 million mail-in ballots but knew from the CVR-or a cross with census data-how many of those people had voted-and when they last did it. The DVS has the capability to analyze these lists one against the other, factoring in scanned in ballots returned via drop boxes. The important list being generated is the one that has the delta names or those who have not returned a ballot yet. This list was used to mail reminders to those who had not voted yet-returned their mail-in ballot to a drop box that was then picked up by the SOS anointed election box “judges” and scanned into the system and correlated with the CVR.
If I were looking to create some padding or fudging for certain candidates, this delta list of folks who had not yet voted would do the trick. As the voting window was closing and we ran out of time to mail reminders, I would do a running listing-an ordered run-that identified names that had not voted yet, correlated and ordered according to those who had not voted in recent elections, from oldest to most recent.
While somewhat of a blinding flash of the obvious-since the ballots were being scanned as they came in to generate the mail notification lists-the machine had a pretty good tally on how the candidate counts for the big races-president, senator, others-was breaking. With the large number of non-affiliated voters in 2020-some 600K-it would seemingly make it harder to allocate these votes-but there were very few republicans in that batch.
Getting back to the story, other than Powell winning the day in court and likely setting the stage well for defense of the defamation lawsuit, I pointed out in Part 7 of the series the sad truth is that Coomer will never be held to account on whether and how he made the Dominion Voting Systems work for the candidate that was favored.
I want to be clear that Coomer is free to sing here, because if he and the DVS technicians just followed their contract directions and the guidance of his government leads, he most likely did nothing other than to identify a bunch of names who had not voted yet-and sent them to adjudication “just in case they came in last minute.” Recall that Fulton County, Georgia had one chunk of ballots where some 85% (like 95K of 113K votes) or some ridiculously high numbers were passed through and had to be adjudicated.
As you are watching the point of this story-the police video of Dr. Eric Coomer, a corporate officer of Dominion-don’t let me influence dear reader in any way, but let your mind wander to a question about whether you think he was the type of character that would have happily been involved in something like the above, or does he seem like more of a straight arrow that would not be inclined to cooperate in any such schemes?
So, it was with great, guilt-free pleasure that I found this video (actually, my wife found it) that has evidence that he is in some way suffering for his misdeeds. It also proves-at least to me-that he is such a morally bankrupt person that had no compunction whatsoever lying about a vehicle accident that could have easily killed somebody. But moreso proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is the absolute low-life, crappy human being that his actions have demonstrated him to be.
Not only was he an absolute mess approximately one month prior to the deposition as the burden of testifying took its toll, but he demonstrated character traits that would normally render someone totally unfit to be involved in any aspect of an election in America.
Maybe that was the point all along.
When you watch the video and find yourself laughing at the ineptitude and stupidity of this soy boy-it would ordinarily be humorous-just think that this is the scumbag that worked to refine the Dominion Voting System all those years in order to allow it to produce election results that mattered to the cause.
We can talk about stuffing ballot boxes-I think that is a diversion. Because in the scenario I outlined above, the DVS system doesn’t need voters and it doesn’t need ballots: it just needs the CVF or the census data and the software that will produce the delta of those who have not voted yet (Microsoft Sequel Server, part of the DVS package.)
The real tragedy and bottom line is nothing is going to happen here as long as we have a Soro’s person as Secretary of State and a government currently dominated by democrats who have little to no interest in any aspect of election 2020.
Something has gone wrong with our system when a lying, scumbag, dirty low down unethical rat like the character in this video ends up being the main operator and trainer of the electronic tabulation systems that at least 28 states relied upon for their election results over the last several cycles. Colorado in 2020 relied on the machines installed by this dirtbag in 62 of 64 counties.
I covered a lot of material over the course of these articles, but the most disturbing single factor that emerged is the fact that with the help of this dirtbag, I believe that either (1) he acting on his own initiative (2) or the Colorado Secretary of State colluding with him (3) or a combination of hints, nudges and knowing-but not quite knowing, directing-but not quite directing-took place and enabled them to produce ballots for adjudication to put Biden over the top.
I described Dr. Eric Coomer (in Part 7,) as “until recently he was the VP for Strategy and Security at Dominion Voting Systems (DVS.) He began his IT election career in 2005 working for Sequoia, becoming the chief software architect. He later took over all development operations as Vice President of Engineering. DVS acquired Sequoia in 2010, with Coomer joining as Vice President of US Engineering overseeing development in the Denver, Colorado office.”
Under this scenario Coomer did nothing but execute instructions as part of his contract to properly identify problematic ballots using the approved process for adjudication by authorities. It is unlikely that any FBI agents are going to apply the type of pressure-door knockdown-threat to reputation and livelihood-draining of his financial accounts funding attorneys to meet government imposed legal actions and deadlines-necessary to turn Coomer into the type of songbird that makes and breaks cases: and that is a travesty. Particularly in light of his chance meeting with the building-what an opportunity!
One of the issues with the focus on DVS and in particular Eric Coomer is the bottom-line, so what question: can a court of law find that Eric Coomer used his expertise and engineering talents through the employment of DVS to change election results? It is an unfortunate truth that this is the wrong issue and wrong person and wrong question to pursue causality in this matter, notwithstanding that Coomer may be a brilliant engineer capable of setting up the conditions to contribute to such an effort like bowling pins on a short alley. But we don’t indict people who have different morals and ethics than we do, nor for their political views.
The day the justice and legal system allows lawsuits to succeed based on the tools or devices used by criminals in the conduct of their efforts is the day that knife and gun manufacturers shutter efforts in America for good. So where does that leave us with Dr. Eric Coomer? Nowhere: under our current version of justice those who executed these efforts across this land get away with it-unless the FBI takes action via a pressure campaign-or the weight of these lawsuits results in extruding enough information or monetary pressure in the form of settlements-so that the songbirds are motivated and incentivized to sing.
It’s unfortunately a very long shot at this point despite the smoke. And as a friend remarked after seeing the video, Coomer should turn himself in before somebody does an Arkansas brake job on his truck and he comes down the mountain via the short cut….
30 December 2025
Originally published 1 March 2022
LSMBTGA: Lamestream media echo chamber (LMEC-L) social media (SM) big tech tyrants (BT,) government (G) and academia (A)
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Substack: AmericanFreeNewsNetworkSubstack
TruthSocial:@AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA