Bski’s Classroom
Let me say something out loud before this article goes another word.
RACISM IS EVIL.
Not a political position. Not a debate opener. An absolute moral statement I hold with every fiber of my being as a human being, as a Christian, as a man who wore the uniform for twenty-three years and went to a country where I watched, with my own eyes, what happens when human beings decide that other people are worth less because of who they were born as. I have seen what tribal hatred produces at its logical conclusion. I have carried what it produces. I have called for a medevac and tried to keep someone alive long enough to say goodbye to his family because of it.
Racism. Is. Evil.
I need that to be the foundation. Because what I am about to tell you is not a defense of racism. It is an indictment of the people who are KEEPING it alive on purpose. The people who need it gasping. The people who show up with a defibrillator every four years because the moment racism draws its last natural breath, their entire political machine loses its reason to exist.
The demand for white supremacy on the American left outstrips the supply. So they manufactured some. Allegedly with a checkbook and a nonprofit.
Americans — by virtually every measure of cross-racial tolerance — are among the least racist people on earth right now. Not the least racist in history. Least racist on the PLANET, today, 2026. The poll statistics show the vast majority of Americans are fine living next to people of different races, fine intermarrying across racial lines, fine working alongside anyone who shows up and does the job. The data does not cooperate with the narrative.
Which creates a business problem for a party whose entire political identity depends on the narrative being true.
So. They solved the business problem.
— THE SPLC INDICTMENT: SET THE FIRE, SELL THE BUCKET —
The allegation: between 2014 and 2023, the SPLC — the organization that the New York Times cited as an authority on hate in more than 700 articles since 2010, that Amazon used to screen charity eligibility, that PayPal worked with to freeze accounts, that the FBI consulted until October 2025 — was quietly funneling MORE THAN THREE MILLION DOLLARS to individuals associated with the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nations, the American Nazi Party, and the very Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville that Democrats spent years waving in your face.
Not accidentally. As a policy.
One individual received $270,000 — the same individual allegedly in the online chat group organizing Charlottesville, helping coordinate transportation for attendees. A National Alliance neo-Nazi collected over a MILLION DOLLARS over more than twenty years. A former American Nazi Party officer received over $300,000. And here is the one I need you to sit with: a former National Alliance chairman was simultaneously receiving $140,000 in SPLC payments AND appearing on the SPLC’s own extremist watchlist page, where his photo was being used to SOLICIT DONATIONS from the public.
They were writing him checks and using his face to raise money against him at the same time. That is not hypocrisy. That is a business plan.
The acting attorney general said it plainly: the SPLC was “manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose.” Set the fire. Sell the bucket. Charge extra for the bucket. Repeat until indicted.
And the Biden’s Autopen administration opened this investigation. Then MYSTERIOUSLY CLOSED IT. Then it got reopened. Now here we are. Their endowment reportedly sat at approximately $732 million while they were allegedly writing KKK paychecks. I keep waiting for the outrage from the party that claims to be against white supremacy. Still waiting.
Quinn’s Second Law: if you want to know what liberals are doing, watch what they accuse conservatives of. The organization screaming loudest about white supremacy was allegedly the one with Klansmen on payroll. The accusation was the admission. Every. Single. Time.
— VIRGINIA & LOUISIANA v. CALLAIS: WHEN COLORBLINDNESS BECOMES THE ENEMY —
I want to walk you through two events from 2026 that together tell you everything you need to know about the Democratic Party’s actual position on race in America.
Event one: Virginia. Democrats just redrew the state’s congressional map from a 6-to-5 Democratic advantage to a 10-to-1 Democratic advantage. In a state that votes roughly 55-45 Democrat. Barack Obama filmed television advertisements in favor of this map and called it a defense of democracy. Democrats outspent the opposition three-to-one — $64 million against approximately $21 million. The measure passed 51-49, driven almost entirely by a handful of heavily Democratic urban counties while the rest of the state voted against it. Former Governor Glenn Youngkin called it an egregious power grab. He was correct.
A ten-to-one map in a fifty-five/forty-five state does not represent voters. It erases them. Four hundred and fifty-five out of every thousand Virginians who voted Republican now have their congressional voice essentially eliminated. Not diminished. Eliminated. And Barack Obama is calling that democracy while starring in commercials.
Event two: On April 29, 2026, the United States Supreme Court handed down Louisiana v. Callais in a 6-3 decision written by Justice Alito. The issue was whether states must draw additional majority-minority congressional districts whenever population distribution would allow it. The Court said no. The core holding: equal protection means EQUAL. Minority voters are entitled to “nothing less and nothing more” than what race-neutral criteria produce. You cannot repackage a partisan gerrymander as a racial one just because race and party affiliation are heavily correlated.
That is it. Colorblind constitutional standard. Equal protection applied equally.
The left MELTED DOWN.
Representative Stansbury went on camera with flags and a pained expression to announce SCOTUS had “gutted enforcement of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.” Barack Obama posted that the ruling allows legislatures “to systematically dilute the voting power of racial minorities.” Chuck Schumer called it another Republican attempt to “rig the system.”
Neither of them cited a single sentence of the actual 51-page opinion. Because the opinion says the opposite of what they claimed.
I read it. Let me tell you what they are ACTUALLY saying when you strip away the vocabulary.
They are arguing that without government-managed racial warehousing — without a state official drawing a geographic box specifically calibrated to concentrate Black voters and deliver that box to a predetermined Democratic incumbent — Black Americans cannot have their voices heard in a democracy. That is their argument, stated plainly. Black voters require a racial corral designed and maintained by Democratic Party operatives in order to participate. Without it, chaos.
That is not protection. That is ownership.
And here is the historical parallel that should make everyone’s jaw drop. At the Constitutional Convention in 1787, Southern slaveholding states — the political ancestors of the modern Democratic Party — demanded enslaved people be counted in full for congressional apportionment. Not to give those people rights. Not to let them vote. To inflate the slave states’ congressional representation and give slaveholders MORE political power. The Three-Fifths Compromise was a LIMITATION — the abolitionists wanted a zero count specifically because full counting multiplied the master’s power using the bodies of the people being enslaved.
In 1787, they counted Black bodies to generate congressional power while denying those people any political rights. In 2024, they concentrated Black voters in noncompetitive gerrymandered districts to generate congressional power while insulating Democratic incumbents from any accountability to the communities they “represent.”
The mechanism updated. The dynamic did not.
Here is what a race-neutral competitive district actually does for Black voters, by the way. It forces the representative to EARN votes. To deliver results. To be accountable. A noncompetitive majority-minority district packed so tightly that the Democratic incumbent cannot lose regardless of performance means you can run the same person for thirty years, accomplish nothing measurable for the community, and face zero electoral consequence. That is not representation. That is a reserved parking spot.
The Congressional Black Caucus made the same point accidentally when they denied membership to Steve Cohen, the congressman representing Tennessee’s 9th District in Memphis — a majority-Black district. Black voters went to the polls, exercised their right, and elected Cohen to represent them. The CBC said no. Because he is white. The Black voters of Memphis chose their representative and the CBC told them they chose wrong.
That is the Democratic Party telling Black voters their votes only count when cast correctly.
Colorblindness is their existential threat. Which is why the Court embracing it produced the response it did.
— THE SAVE ACT: THE MOST INSULTING ARGUMENT IN AMERICAN POLITICS —
Let me tell you what the SAVE Act actually is. Because the distance between what Democratic politicians are saying and what the bill actually says is so vast it requires either that they have not read it, cannot understand it, or are perfectly comfortable lying to you about it. Pick whichever explanation you prefer — none of them are flattering.
The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, H.R. 22, does one thing: it requires proof of United States citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections. That is it. Not when showing up to vote. Not to cast a ballot. When REGISTERING. And it accepts a generous list of documents to satisfy that requirement: a REAL ID indicating citizenship, a valid U.S. passport, a military ID combined with a service record showing U.S. birth, OR — and this is important — a birth certificate or consular report of birth abroad COMBINED WITH a standard photo ID. Section 2(f) of the bill specifically addresses name discrepancies for married women, providing an explicit process to handle exactly the situation they keep claiming the bill ignores.
They have either not read Section 2(f), or they are counting on you not reading it.
Chuck Schumer said the SAVE Act would kick “20 million American citizens” off the voter rolls. The bill does not touch current registrations. It applies to new registrations. Someone is not telling the truth here.
Here is what these specific politicians have said about it. Schumer called it “the single strictest voter-ID law in America.” Rep. Rashida Tlaib called it “voter suppression” and accused Republicans of trying to “rig elections.” Rep. Gwen Moore called it “Jim Crow 2.0.” Rep. Yvette Clarke, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, said it “resurrected Jim Crow.” The CBC officially stated the bill “would make it harder to vote for millions of eligible U.S. citizens — disproportionately Black and minority voters.”
I need to stop at that CBC statement and address it directly, because it contains the single most racist argument in modern American politics. And it is being made by the people claiming to protect Black Americans.
The argument, stripped to its foundation, is that Black Americans cannot obtain photo identification. That the simple, routine, universally required act of getting a government-issued ID — the same credential required to drive a car, board an airplane, purchase alcohol, open a bank account, apply for a job, rent an apartment, pick up a prescription, or enter a Democratic National Committee event — is UNIQUELY beyond the capacity of Black Americans.
That is not advocacy. That is contempt wearing a compassion costume.
I teach in a high-need district. Every one of my students has faced obstacles that would break most adults. When they needed identification for something that mattered to them, they found a way to get it. Because they are capable human beings. The same capable human beings the Democratic Party is now publicly arguing cannot manage what a sixteen-year-old needs to buy a lottery ticket.
The polling: 83% of Americans support voter ID. 71% of DEMOCRATS support it. 76% of Black Americans. 80% of Hispanic Americans. The CBC is not speaking for Black America on this one. The data is very clear about that.
But here is my favorite part. On this very question, Senator John Ossoff of Georgia held a campaign rally where attendees were required to show a government-issued photo ID to enter. The same Senator Ossoff who then voted against voter ID requirements for federal elections. He understood perfectly that identification matters when you are protecting something you care about. Apparently federal elections do not make that list.
Senator Cory Booker physically SPRINTED to an airport to announce that ICE was out of control — while ICE was shortening the security lines the shutdown had extended. But on voter ID? He says requiring ID is voter suppression. It must be nice to have that kind of flexibility with your principles.
The “Jim Crow 2.0” comparison is not just wrong. It is historically illiterate to the point of requiring correction. Actual Jim Crow was created by DEMOCRATS specifically to prevent Black Americans from voting. Poll taxes. Literacy tests calibrated to disenfranchise Black voters. Physical violence at polling places administered by Democratic state governments. Senator Robert Byrd — former KKK RECRUITER, beloved by the Democratic Party until his death in 2010 — filibustered the Civil Rights Act for fourteen hours to preserve those barriers.
Democrats calling a bill that PROTECTS the integrity of every citizen’s vote “Jim Crow 2.0” is a statement that could only be made by people who are confident nobody will check the historical record. It is the historical record that I am asking you to check.
The SAVE Act says: only citizens vote in federal elections, and here is a generous list of ways to prove you are one. You can call that a lot of things. Jim Crow is not one of them.
— THE MINIMUM WAGE: A RACIST HISTORY THAT NEVER MAKES THE SYLLABUS —
I teach at a high-need Career Tech high school. Published my own textbooks because the ones available were not good enough for my students. When I say certain pieces of American history are being deliberately withheld from the people with the most reason to care about them, I am saying it as someone inside the system watching the erasure happen in real time every single year.
The minimum wage was invented by racists. To price Black workers out of the labor market. By law.
Documented history. Princeton economist Thomas Leonard spent a career establishing it. The progressive economists of the early twentieth century — the intellectual parents of today’s Democratic Party — were enthusiastic eugenicists who advocated minimum wages SPECIFICALLY because a high enough price floor would eliminate what they called “unemployables” from the labor market. Their word. When they said “unemployables,” they meant Black Americans, recent immigrants, and the disabled.
Union leaders stated it plainly in writing: minimum wage rules removed “the incentive for employing the Negro.” Not an editorial interpretation. A primary source.
Then the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931. Federal law. Southern Democrats and northern union bosses pushed it through specifically to protect white union workers from competition with Black construction workers. Texas Representative Martin Dies said on the floor of Congress — in the Congressional Record — “you cannot prescribe the same wages for the Black man as the White man.” The bill passed.
The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 excluded agricultural workers and domestic servants. Historians including Ira Katznelson have documented that these exclusions were the price Southern Democrats demanded in exchange for their votes, because agricultural and domestic work was where Black Americans were concentrated in the Jim Crow South. Preserving the quasi-plantation economic system that Southern Democrats depended upon. In 1938. Under a Democratic president. With Democratic votes.
Milton Friedman — Nobel Prize in Economics, 1976 — called the minimum wage “the most anti-Negro law on our statute books.” In 1966. Today Democrats call it racial justice.
The data matches the history. A review of more than one hundred minimum wage studies found approximately two-thirds showed NEGATIVE employment effects. Research in South Carolina found minimum wage increases reduced employment by 8.9% for teenagers and 15.5% for workers without a high school diploma. Fifteen-point-five percent. The most economically vulnerable workers — disproportionately young workers of color — priced out of their first job at a rate of fifteen and a half percent.
The policy was designed to do exactly that in 1931. It is still doing exactly that in 2026. The branding changed. The outcomes did not move an inch.
Quinn’s Law Number One: liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent. Every. Single. Time.
— THE NUMBERS THEY PRAY YOU NEVER PUT TOGETHER —
I want to stop before I give you the next statistics and say something.
These numbers involve real families. Real children who grew up without fathers. Real mothers who made rational decisions inside an irrational incentive structure. Real communities that carried the downstream damage of a policy design that was either deliberately destructive or so catastrophically negligent it makes no practical moral difference.
In 1960, before Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society programs took hold, approximately 80 to 85 percent of Black children in America were raised in two-parent households.
I need you to feel the weight of that number. A community that had survived chattel slavery. The Black Codes. Jim Crow. Organized political terror. Systematic economic exclusion. Through all of it — THROUGH ALL OF IT — the Black American family maintained structural cohesion that social scientists of that era documented with genuine admiration.
Then the Great Society programs arrived.
The marriage penalties were built in architecturally. Benefits available to single mothers disappeared when they married. The federal government was, with mathematical precision, paying fathers to leave. The incentive structure made family formation financially irrational. Within ONE generation, that figure collapsed below 30 percent. Out-of-wedlock births went from 21 percent in 1965 to over 77 percent today.
Two hundred years of slavery could not destroy the Black family. Jim Crow could not destroy it. One generation of Democratic welfare architecture did it in thirty years.
That is not systemic racism. That is the direct, documented, mathematically predictable consequence of a program whose incentive structure penalized marriage and rewarded single parenthood. You do not accidentally build that machine and fund it for sixty years without noticing.
On January 10, 1963, Congressman Albert Herlong read into the Congressional Record a list of 45 Communist Goals for America, derived from Cleon Skousen’s The Naked Communist. I evaluate outcomes, not intentions. Goal Number 40 reads: “Discredit the family as an institution.” Whatever anyone intended, the welfare architecture the Democratic Party built produced that outcome with a precision no deliberate plan could have improved upon.
The antebellum South needed an enslaved population to sustain its political order. The Democratic Party of 2026 needs a dependent population — poorly educated, unable to find employment, reliant on government programs — to sustain its electoral coalition. The mechanism changed. The operating logic has not moved by a single degree in two hundred years.
— THE PEOPLE WAKING UP (AND WHY THAT TERRIFIES THE MACHINE) —
Here is the part of the story the machine cannot control.
You cannot stop people from thinking. Not forever. Not when reality keeps showing up uninvited.
I see it in clips from across the country — Black Americans walking into Trump stores expecting the hostility they were promised and finding people who are just… normal and kind. A woman who went in as a “social experiment” and came out smiling. A man in a MAGA hat walking through an anti-Trump crowd, someone pulling up to tell him how to live, and him saying simply: “My money, my damn business.”
Congressman Wesley Hunt of Texas — a Black Republican representing a majority-white district — said something when asked about Black representation in Congress that I have been turning over in my mind ever since: “I’m not here because I’m black. I am here because I am a qualified representative. I’m being judged not by the color of my skin but by the content of my character. I don’t want to get into this game of race bait all day every day.”
That sentence — pulled directly from Martin Luther King’s dream — is the sentence that ends the Democratic coalition if enough Americans take it seriously as actual policy. Which is exactly why they would rather draw a ten-to-one map than have colorblindness become the operating principle of American electoral life.
Apostle Alton R. Williams of World Overcomers Outreach Ministries in Memphis said it to his congregation in words that deserve to be heard exactly as spoken:
“When one party knows that they’re going to get your vote no matter what, you get nothing. Democrats expect the Black vote so they do not help them. Republicans know the Blacks will not vote for them, so they do not help them.” — Apostle Alton R. Williams, World Overcomers Outreach Ministries, Memphis, TN
The moment that question spreads — the moment political loyalty becomes contingent on actual delivery — the machine stops. So when voters start answering it by drifting toward independence, the response is not policy change. It is not earned loyalty. It is a ten-to-one congressional map and a SCOTUS meltdown over colorblind equal protection.
— THEY NEED THE PATIENT TO STAY SICK —
Racism is dying.
I believe that. Not because I am naive. Because the actual data — not the SPLC fundraising emails, not the CBC press releases, not the media coverage calibrated to keep the amygdala firing — the actual polling, the actual intermarriage rates, the actual daily lived experience of most Americans says that the America the left is selling does not match the America most people actually inhabit.
That is profoundly good news.
It is an extinction-level crisis for a political party that built its coalition on a problem it needs to be perpetual.
So they allegedly fund some Klansmen. They draw a ten-to-one map. They oppose a Supreme Court ruling that says equal protection should mean EQUAL. They call proof-of-citizenship voter registration requirements Jim Crow while the actual Jim Crow architects are in their own party’s history. They defend a minimum wage with documented eugenicist origins and call it racial justice. They build welfare architecture with marriage penalties and call it compassion. They manufacture the supply of the crisis because their political survival depends on the crisis never resolving.
Racism is on its last breath. Don’t worry. The Democrats have the paddles ready. They have been shocking it back to life for two hundred years. They are very practiced at this by now.
The cruelest part of all of it is that the people hurt most are the people the machine claims to protect. The Black communities in cities Democrats have governed unchallenged for fifty years while those communities’ metrics declined. The young workers priced out of their first job by a minimum wage with a documented racist pedigree. The children growing up in fatherless households because the federal government made it financially rational for their father to leave. The voters whose voices are being channeled through noncompetitive racial districts that serve a party rather than a community.
Those are not statistics. Those are people. And they deserve the truth about who built the trap. They deserve representatives who have to EARN their votes instead of drawing maps to make those votes irrelevant when they go somewhere unexpected.
And they deserve better than an organization that was allegedly writing $3 million worth of KKK checks while positioning itself as the national authority on fighting the KKK.
But what do I know — I am only a medically retired Army combat medic who went to Iraq, a published science textbook author, and a high school teacher who has spent a career watching the machinery described in this article produce real damage in real communities with real faces and real names. I read the SAVE Act. I read Louisiana v. Callais. I read the Congressional Record. I am genuinely, permanently, deeply angry about all of it. And that anger is entirely appropriate.
IF THIS ARTICLE MADE YOU THINK:
LIKE this article so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it.
SHARE this — every share really helps get the word out. Use it.
COMMENT below with your take. Did you know the minimum wage was invented by eugenicists to price Black workers out of the labor market?
Did you know the SAVE Act specifically addresses the “married women” problem in Section 2(f)? Did you know 76% of Black Americans support voter ID? Tell me what surprised you most.
And if you want MORE of this — the data, the history, the science, the stories — JOIN Bski’s Classroom community on X or follow me on YouTube. Even better, subscribe to my account; it is about the cost of a cup of coffee per month. That is it. Your support keeps this classroom open, and I promise I will never run out of material as long as the left keeps trying to out-dumb itself.
Mike Borowski is a medically retired Army combat medic with 23 years of service, including a combat deployment to Iraq, and a high school Anatomy and Physics teacher at a high-need Career Technical district in Northeast Ohio — where he also wrote and published the textbooks for both courses. He runs “Bski’s Classroom,” a platform dedicated to cutting through political noise with data, history, and the kind of blunt honesty that comes from someone who has seen both war and the American classroom up close.
—
X (Twitter): x.com/BskiMike22802
Substack: substack.com/@bskimike22802
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@BskiMike22802
AFNN: https://afnn.us/author/mikeborowski/
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA