Earlier this month, in Part XXXII, while still in the realm of song parody, we participated in another of the great debates (up there with Tastes Great-Less Filling and Candy Mint-Breath Mint) trying to determine if the terrible shape of the state of our economy, foreign and domestic policy was the result of Joe Biden’s incompetence or if he was succeeding in aiding the left in its fundamental transformation of American by deliberately destroying its constitution and the working institutions it created or allowed to grow and thrive. This week, we will attempt to examine a revealing moment about the agenda of those leading this “fundamental transformation” that occurred during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Biden Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson.
When asked by Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee) to define what a woman was, Judge Jackson demurred, claiming not to be a biologist. The democrat media signed on to the non-answer.
Ketanji Brown Jackson is a graduate of Yale Law School, which has the reputation as the best law school in the country. She is a member of the political party and political movement that has passed a bill through the House of Representatives that wishes to eliminate qualified immunity as a defense for law enforcement officers with respect to constitutional violations that are not otherwise known to be constitutional violations at the time they are committed. Her refusal to answer a question at a hearing with ample time for prior preparation and deliberation contrasts with what jail staff with high school educations are required to make every day again and again, i.e. who goes to the men’s prison and who goes to the women’s prison.
To add to Senator Blackburn’s observations, the unwillingness of a nominee for the Supreme Court to offer a definition of a woman highlights the deceptive and hypocritical nature of the left and those who try to advance their cause.
Beyond defining what a woman is, recent history is full of examples of women who serve as fine examples of people who made great use of their human potential and creativity. One such example is Carole King, whose prolific career as a songwriter is challenged by her record as a performer. Though she helped pen so many of the pop hits of the 1960s, and had in the 1970s what was at the time the biggest selling album, for today’s piece I wish to borrow a song that she wrote that was made a hit by another gifted performer and fine example of womanhood. Aretha Franklin was known as the Queen of Soul, and apparently did not feel the need to complete graduate work in biology before belting out Carole King’s song “(You Make Me Feel Like A) Natural Woman”.
I have borrowed the tune today to mock the inability of the left to define what a woman is. While Bill Clinton introduced a new low when he quibbled over the definition of what “is” is, Ketanji Brown Jackson has shown that with the left, there is no bottom, but only a series of descending ledges.
Looking out on the world today
It can seem it’s really broken
And when I see what can make it worse
None succeed like the woke can
But when you look for motive, it’s not just for sport
They want a woke Supreme Court
But they can’t define
They can’t define
They can’t define what’s a actual woman (woman)
When common sense is in the lost and found
They won’t step up to claim it
and despite Vagina Monologues
They can’t even name it
Now it’s no longer doubtful, of what it is they plan
If they can’t tell a woman from a man
But they can’t define
They can’t define
They can’t define what’s a actual woman (woman)
Oh, babies, now a man can bear (now a man can bear)
As long as you identify (identify)
Be whatever you want to be (want to be)
Y chromosomes don’t make you a guy
They can’t define
They can’t define
They can’t define what’s a actual woman (woman)
They can’t define
They can’t define
They can’t define what’s a actual woman (woman)
They can’t define
They can’t define
Follow AFNN:
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: AFNN_USA
The 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on sex, stating:
k) The terms “because of sex” or “on the basis of sex” include, but are not limited to, because of or on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions; and women affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions shall be treated the same for all employment-related purposes…
Now if the judge cannot define women then how can she apply a law to prohibit discrimination against women?
Excellent point.
She didn’t even get in a clever line like Justice Stewart saying while she can’t define one, she knows one when she sees one.
If she cannot define “woman” then how can she be the first black “woman” on the Court?
May I recommend one small change? Add “n” to make the refrain “an actual woman”.