It’s no secret that our mainstream media companies prioritize advertising revenue over the truth, and nowhere is this more obvious than in their cozy relationships with big pharma and the military-industrial complex. Ever wondered why you’re bombarded with ads for medications you need a doctor’s approval to buy or slick promos from defense contractors selling tanks and fighter jets you’ll (hopefully) never need to shop for? Spoiler alert: it’s not to keep you informed—it’s to keep media companies rich. Big pharma and defense giants know exactly what they’re doing, and so does the media. They’re all in on the game, cashing in on your trust.
Big pharma spends millions of dollars advertising drugs directly to consumers, urging people to “ask their doctor” about the latest pill, complete with a list of horrifying side effects whispered at lightning speed. Do we really need a commercial to remind us that cholesterol exists? No. But pharma companies understand that by putting millions into ad campaigns, they’re also buying goodwill from networks. The message is clear: run our ads, and we won’t have to worry about your station running that “expose” on drug pricing or shady research practices. Media companies know better than to bite the hand that feeds them.
And then we have the military-industrial complex. Defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Boeing don’t exactly have a booth at your local mall. So, why are they paying big bucks to run ads? Simple: these ads keep public sentiment cozy with the idea of ever-increasing defense budgets. The flashy visuals of jets soaring through the sky might not make you want to buy one, but they subtly shape public opinion—and, more importantly, remind politicians and networks where their bread is buttered. The media, of course, gets a healthy slice of that budget, so they won’t be running any critical stories about the cost of military contracts anytime soon.
The next time you tune into the news, remember that it’s all about who’s paying to play. Big pharma and defense contractors aren’t interested in providing public service announcements; they’re buying media loyalty and ensuring their stories (or lack thereof) get favorable treatment. By pouring money into advertising, they’re effectively insulating themselves from investigative journalism that might expose uncomfortable truths about drug side effects, drug pricing, or questionable defense expenditures. After all, if the media can rely on that sweet, sweet ad revenue, they won’t rock the boat.
So here we are, fed a steady diet of “news” that’s more interested in keeping advertisers happy than keeping us informed. The next time you’re encouraged to “ask your doctor” or watch a fighter jet zip across the screen, remember: it’s not about you, it’s about the dollar signs. And as long as these companies keep signing those ad contracts, don’t expect the mainstream media to suddenly care about delivering the unvarnished truth.
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA