There Are A Lot Of Anomalous Aspects To Colorado Elections
Part 1 provided an introduction to lay the groundwork on how modern computing technology advancements have automated many aspects of daily life powered by cloud analytics and I also introduced Dr. Eric Coomer of Dominion Voting Systems (DVS.) In Part 2 we discuss some odd features of recent Colorado elections.
Coomer arrived in Denver, Colorado in 2010, just by coincidence arriving in time to witness a period where Colorado was allegedly in the process of turning Purple from 2010-2017. However, whenever democrats seemed on the verge of that signal breakthrough, they failed the one test voters always administer: you have to avoid being crazy. They couldn’t do it!
There was no doubt in anybody’s mind that 2016 was going to be a banner year and long past time for a woman to be president. Colorado delivered for HRC but it was a pyric victory as democrats did not make any strides in going purple.
Which is why it was doubly astounding when in 2018 the Centennial state blew past Purple and turned full Blue in an election that startled all and also raised some concerns about how exactly it came about. Democrats gained more power in that election than they had managed to achieve since the 1930s. In an off-election year. Powered by unaffiliated voters. Who supposedly hated Trump. But not enough to register as democrats. Smells somewhat like day old fish bait (squid.)
The appearance of Coomer in Denver starting in 2010 and the surprising results in 2018 could obviously be mere coincidence. That DVS was involved in Colorado elections is not in dispute, in fact by 2015, 62 of 64 counties used DVS: 62….But let’s hold that thought for now.
Colorado implemented a vote by mail system exclusively and a Drop Box Voting Policy that started in 2013 (retired judges are the caretakers of these ballots-but they aren’t “real judges” and it turns out they are SOS certified-the process-in theory-has a lot of safeguards-but humans are involved….) There are no postmarks on Drop Box ballots: which I always found strange because you end up with an election “window” like a holiday sale that shuts down on a certain date, but none of the ballots bear any date stamp other than when signed by the voter and the official date when the collecting judge sealed, signed and dated the seal when they put it in their car. I wonder if it stays with the ballots as chain of custody proof? Hold that thought for now.
If you had asked me a dozen or more years ago whether judges could be trusted to perform such an important task, the question would have been “conspiracy-like.” Today judges in general are likely hovering around the popularity of cockroaches in public sentiment (American Thinker’s Andrea Widburg covers the head cockroach here…) Of course these are paper judges certified by the SOS…
Interestingly enough, a voter who shows up to vote in person must show a valid identification to do so: but obviously not to fill out a mail ballot and drop it in a box: that’s odd. What really affiliates the voter with the ballot in that case? The signature on the envelope: and I have seen evidence that the Colorado voting apparatus has the capability and process to verify a valid signature, flag anomalies and return the ballot to a voter for disposition. But only if such a process has been invoked for the election.
There is also somewhat of a dispute on what signature is being matched, a registration entry, or the same one that requested the ballot. The 2020 election resulted in a total of 40 thousand ballots rejected for a variety of problems, including mis-matched signatures, 29 thousand of which were cured and counted. Of course, in many cases nobody requested any ballots in 2020, they were sent out like some mass mailing of a lottery sweepstakes to all 102% percent of registered voters (but I digress) and hold that thought.
Registration is done automatically through the DMV and anybody who has registered a vehicle in Colorado is likely aware that a big ruse of dogmatically enforcing document requirements started in 2017 in what felt like an act of punishment or malicious compliance against citizens (requiring passports, social security cards (that flimsiest of all IDs,) but not out of state driver’s license, nor military ID card, nor US government retirement ID.)) There is no citizenship information solicited nor recorded at registration.
Felons are disenfranchised while incarcerated but may vote upon release from prison. Sixteen-year-olds can register to vote as long as the election they are registering for occurs after they turn 18. The above provisions read like the “don’t do this in your elections” section from the Carter-Baker 2005 election study effort.”
There are some curious things about the election results in Colorado in recent years. The 2020 turnout was reportedly ~87% of registered voters, an astounding figure that included a reported 77% turnout rate among its “voting-eligible population,” which was 5 points higher than the 2016 election. An 87% turnout rate! I don’t think you could get that high a turnout giving away free money in a donut shop parking lot! There would be at least 20% who wouldn’t believe it!
Much like the surprise election in 2018 that turned Colorado Blue, unaffiliated voters accounted for “the largest spike in votes by party affiliation, casting 400,000 more votes in this election when compared to 2016, while 5,000 fewer republican votes were cast.” So about 13% or more of the voters were apparently without passion for either side at a time when pundits insisted that they turned out to vote against Trump. And there was big talk of a “revolt” against the Bad Orange Man, “Twittering Fool” that resulted in -gasp-5 thousand fewer republican votes or like 3/10s of 1 % who apparently abandoned DJT…The fish bait is elevating to gas station sushi…
The 2018 election saw an increase of 260,000 unaffiliated voters participate in comparison to 2014. To belabor the point, some would consider this quite an oddity that these elections (2018, 2020) have been described as a vote expressing distaste for Trump politics. Yet not so “distasteful” as to cause these voters to affiliate and register as democrats. If the math is right, there was a 660K increase in unaffiliated voters from 2014 to 2020 representing some ~20% of total voters. During a time when the overall population grew by some 200K people. Gee, 660K seems like a lot!
Joe Biden received 1.8 million votes, DJT 1.37 million, Hickenlooper (aka, Chickenpooper-who has only been seen on cereal boxes and milk cartons since his election-he is the politician who insisted he was not suited for the Senate, as he did not have the patience-we showed him) received 1.73 million, while incumbent Senator Cory Gardner received 1.43 million.
The ballot initiative on an amendment to the Colorado Constitution to make it mandatory that Colorado voters had to be an American Citizen to vote received about 2 million votes. DJT underperformed that vote on what might be considered his top state related issue by some 600K votes or 30% (30%) with 3.1 million total votes cast.
Not so fast: Just to restate that as a standalone: two million Coloradans agree that you have to be a US Citizen to vote-and this issue was well into the ballot, not exactly findable in two minutes even while taking your time at home reviewing the ballot initiatives, the judge write ups, etc.: these were apparently committed, attentive voters. Only 70% of these voters (the two million) then voted for the man they were sure was going to implement the measure here and across the US. Some 600K voted for it but did not follow through and vote for either Trump or Gardner if you assume they would naturally be inclined to support the candidate espousing that view (that you needed to be a citizen to vote-i.e., that illegal aliens cannot vote.) Strange!
Looked at another way, of the 3.1 million voters on this issue about 60% or so might have voted for Biden (to get to 1.8 million votes.) If he theoretically received 100% of the no votes, that means he had to receive an additional 700 thousand votes or nearly 40% of the yes votes to reach that total. Put another way, if you assume Biden would have been inclined to allow anyone in this country to fully participate in our processes, he had to overperform the no votes by 40% taking these votes away from the candidate who was absolutely with the 2 million yes votes. Also consider that while DJT was absolutely clear, Biden was not specifically pinned down on this issue (although house democrats had weighed-in.)
The other oddity is the ballot initiative about the national popular vote issue (that the state would provide its electoral college votes to the winner of the popular vote if enough states signed up to the initiative) saw 1.64 million for, and 1.5 million against. DJT underperformed this vote by about 10% or 140K votes. Voters who believed that their votes should elect a president and not California, Texas and New York did not vote 100% for DJT. Also, 60% of these voters voted for Biden, who theoretically overperformed the “nays” by 20% and even the “yays” by 15%. Weird!
So not trying to be cute here, but these unaffiliated voters apparently voted very strongly against Trump policies yet did not support illegals voting and did not feel strongly about a ballot initiative that was focused specifically against the eventuality that Trump lost the popular vote but again won the electoral college! Golly that seems an oddity!
Another fun fact about Colorado is that according to Judicial Watch and their own reported state numbers, Colorado’s voter registration rate is 102%, with 42 counties or nearly 70% exceeding eligible voter numbers (70%.) Gosh oh gee oh golly that seems like a lot!
When you look at overall population figures it reminds of a commercial (“that ain’t right.”) Colorado has some 5.6 million people, 4.6 million registered voters, and 1.9 million homes with somebody under the age of 18 in it. So I’m not trying to do arson here cause I ain’t no math major or genius (Mickey Rourke, Body Heat,) but: it seems like 5.6 million people -1.9 million kids in the homes listed under 18 ineligible to vote would yield a maximum of 3.7 million eligible voters, and if 87% voted the turnout would be ~3.2 million or so, which is close to the ~3.3 million or so that actually voted, right? Since the kids over 16 could register, making it a bit ambiguous, …humma, humma. The obvious question is how could Colorado have 4.6 million registered voters under this-or any-scenario?
Of course, if you account for 3.7 million*102%=just about 3.8 million eligible voters which is about the size of the growth of the unaffiliated voters over and above either the population growth over time or the net increase in Colorado citizens. A puzzlement here is whether unaffiliated is a synonym for illegal alien? A 260K and 400K increase over previous elections is a lot of voters-big enough to be a “fudge factor,” insurance-like pad.
More fun facts: The non-campaigning, basement dweller Biden outperformed-in order-Barack Obama’s 2008 total by ~511K votes or ~38%, Obama in 2012 by ~477K votes or ~36.5%, HRC in 2016 by ~461K or~35.6%, while DJT received 162,123 or ~12.2% more votes than 2016 and .5% more of the overall total than 2016, while losing by about ~430K votes. Trump had enough votes in 2020 to win any election in Colorado’s history-except 2020.
~629K more people (20%-a ginormous number) voted in 2020 than 2016 with a miniscule ballot rejection rate in comparison with historical norms (less than 40K-29K=11K or .0035% compare to a nominal 10% on average,) apparently proving how popular the near octogenarian Biden was in comparison to potentially the first woman president, although 2016 had 1% less votes than 2012. Obama had ~25K more votes in 2012 than 2008 (~2%). ~800K thousand more votes were cast in 2020 in comparison with Obama’s landmark victory in 2008, and 600K more than 2012. (These figures have been updated IAW the latest SOS final numbers.)
These are staggeringly large numbers.
21 December 2025
Originally published 18 June 2021
LSMBTGA: Lamestream media echo chamber (LMEC-L) social media (SM) big tech tyrants (BT,) government (G) and academia (A)
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Substack: AmericanFreeNewsNetworkSubstack
TruthSocial:@AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA
1 thought on “Election Irregularities Project, Dateline Colorado: The Shameful Railroading And Lawfare Persecution Of Whistleblower Tina Peters (Part 2)”