Beware the Fudd: He’s Not Extinct—And Kids, You’re Using the Word Wrong

Somewhere in America, right now, there is a man standing behind a gun counter looking at your AR-15 with the same expression his grandfather probably gave Elvis Presley.

He owns guns. Lots of guns.

He may have a $20,000 Italian over-under, a safe full of walnut-stocked hunting rifles, and enough .30-06 ammunition to fight World War III.

But your $500 AR-15?

“Nobody needs that.”

Congratulations.

You have encountered the American Fudd.

And kids, pay attention, because you’re using that word wrong.

A Fudd is not simply an old gun owner. He’s not a Fudd because he likes revolvers, 1911s, lever guns, Model 70s or walnut stocks. A 78-year-old deer hunter who thinks your tricked-out AR looks like something Darth Vader would carry but nevertheless says, “It’s your money and your right,” is absolutely not a Fudd.

The Fudd appears when he adds:

“Nobody should be allowed to own that.”

There it is.

Fuddism.

The term derives from poor Elmer Fudd, the Looney Tunes hunter eternally chasing a wascally wabbit with his traditional shotgun. Gun culture eventually adopted the name for a particular species of gun owner: the guy who vigorously defends the guns he likes while cheerfully negotiating away the guns you like.

His favorite sentence begins:

“I support the Second Amendment, but…”

Uh-oh.

Shotgun? Fine.

Deer rifle? Fine.

Grandpa’s revolver? Fine.

AR-15?

Whoa there, Rambo.

Suppressor?

Why do you need one of those?

Thirty-round magazine?

Why can’t you kill a deer with three rounds?

The Fudd somehow came to believe the Second Amendment contained an unpublished appendix from the 1967 Sears sporting-goods catalog.

Then came the black rifle revolution.

AR-15s went from strange-looking rifles associated with Vietnam-era military firearms to one of the most recognizable civilian rifle platforms in America. Hunters used them. Competitors used them. Families used them for recreation and defense.

But the Fudd remained suspicious.

One of the great Fudd moments arrived in 2007 when legendary outdoor writer Jim Zumbo criticized AR- and AK-style rifles as inappropriate for hunting and referred to them as “terrorist rifles.”

The gun community erupted.

Zumbo apologized. Sponsors fled. Outdoor Life ended its relationship with him.

The lesson was painful but important:

Your duck gun isn’t protected because it’s a duck gun.

Your Model 70 isn’t protected because it has pretty walnut.

And somebody else’s AR-15 doesn’t become less deserving of constitutional protection because it’s black and makes your Labrador nervous.

Then, in 2018, we were blessed with perhaps the greatest accidental contribution to firearms terminology since somebody invented the shoulder thing that goes up.

Enter retired Army Lieutenant General Mark Hertling.

During a CNN demonstration of an AR-15, the three-star general announced that he was going to demonstrate:

“Full semi-automatic.”

Gun owners everywhere scratched their heads.

Full.

Semi.

Automatic.

That’s like ordering a jumbo shrimp with extra jumbo and half the shrimp.

There is no “full semi-automatic” setting on an ordinary AR-15. Hertling later acknowledged that he’d misspoken; what he meant was simply firing the semiautomatic rifle rapidly by repeatedly pulling the trigger.

Fair enough. Everybody mangles a sentence occasionally.

But for purposes of our discussion, the episode beautifully demonstrates a related danger of General Fuddism: assuming military rank, hunting experience, a badge or simply owning firearms automatically makes somebody an authority on every firearm—or gives him special standing to decide what everybody else needs.

It doesn’t.

A general can be wrong about a rifle.

A lifelong duck hunter can be wrong about an AR.

And a 23-year-old Instagram commando can be wrong about what “Fudd” means.

Which brings us to Generation TikTok.

Kids:

STOP CALLING EVERY OLD GUY A FUDD.

Guy shoots a 1911?

“Fudd.”

Carries a revolver?

“Fudd.”

Owns a Garand?

“Fudd.”

Uses a leather sling?

“Fudd.”

Thinks wood stocks look better than KeyMod?

“Okay, Fudd.”

No.

That’s not Fuddism.

That’s preference.

A man can shoot a Winchester Model 94, wear a red plaid Woolrich jacket, drive a 1978 Ford and hunt from the same deer blind his grandfather built and still be more absolutist about the Second Amendment than the 24-year-old tactical influencer wearing $3,700 worth of night vision in his mother’s basement.

Fudd isn’t an age.

It’s a philosophy.

The Fudd says:

“I don’t need it, therefore you don’t need it.”

That is the disease.

Fortunately, traditional American gun culture largely figured this out.

Walk into deer camp today and you might find a Winchester Model 70 leaning beside an AR-10. The guy shooting sporting clays Saturday might shoot AR Tactical Sunday. The precision-rifle shooter might own a Garand. The cowboy-action guy might have a suppressed AR at home.

Somewhere along the way, we finally realized something profound:

We’re all standing on the same firing line.

That $20,000 Perazzi and the $500 AR-15 don’t compete for constitutional legitimacy.

Neither does your Garand, Glock, squirrel rifle, duck gun, precision rifle, revolver or Grandpa’s old .30-30.

You don’t have to like somebody else’s firearm.

You don’t have to understand why he bought it.

You certainly don’t have to buy one yourself.

But the instant your argument becomes—

“I support the Second Amendment, but you don’t need…”

—we may have a Fudd sighting.

So be vewy, vewy careful.

The Fudd isn’t extinct.

He’s merely evolved.

And remember the simplest identification test:

Fudd isn’t the old guy who doesn’t like your AR-15.

Fudd is the gun owner who doesn’t think you should be allowed to have it.

The Second Amendment doesn’t say “shall not be infringed, provided Elmer approves.”

———-

Definition of Fudd: A gun owner who strongly supports the guns he likes, while being willing to restrict the guns he doesn’t. The classic Fudd line is: “I support the Second Amendment, but nobody needs an AR-15.”

It’s an attitude, not an age group. An 80-year-old with a deer rifle who supports your right to own an AR isn’t a Fudd. A 30-year-old who owns guns but wants yours banned can be.

_________________________________
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
_________________________________

Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA

Leave a Comment