The Democrats/Media, constantly demand that we restrict the Second Amendment as the answer to what they call “gun violence.” They focus on the gun and not the criminal who uses the gun, as if the gun is a living object that decides to shoot and kill.
The Dems say that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic that we do not need, or at least should be drastically limited .
The Dems are not serious about reducing crime. They favor reduced sentences, defunding the police, no bail or low bail for serious crimes, and no prosecution of certain crimes such as shoplifting. They have elected Soros District Attorneys who prosecute only the crimes they believe are crimes, not the crimes on the books. For example, witness the Democrats’ response to the wave of violent riots following the George Floyd killing. The response was mainly to encourage and excuse it as justifiable protest.
As further evidence of the Democrats’ hypocrisy, the Democrats opposed President Trump’s efforts to build a border wall, and now have allowed an open border with Mexico resulting in an increase in crimes committed by illegal aliens.
The open border allows the smuggling of drugs such as fentanyl and heroin that kill over 100,000 Americans each year.
The Biden administration uses the term “criminal noncitizens” to report convictions of illegals with prior criminal convictions. Biden’s own statistics show a big increase in 2021 and 2022,
Since the Democrats want to tamper with the Second Amendment, then we should propose to them that we will tamper with the Second Amendment as part of package deal to restrict the First and Fourth Amendment.
The First Amendment protects free speech which allows Hollywood, a main part of the Democratic Party, to flood and saturate the culture with violent movies, tv shows, video games, and other media that show the most violent scenes. How about forbidding the use of “assault weapons” in movies, limiting movies to one shooting, and having the directors/producers licensed to make such movies? How would the Dems respond to that? Would they say that the flood of violent movies and shows has no effect on inciting violence? If the movies and shows have no effect, then how can they blame the words of President Trump and others for inciting a riot?
The Dems always say that automatic, high-capacity guns/rifles did not exist when the Second Amendment was passed. But movies, especially the violent ones, television, and video games did not exist when the First Amendment was passed.
The Fourth Amendment generally protects us against unreasonable searches, and in most cases requires a warrant based upon probable cause to search, unless the search is requested by Trump Haters such as Comey to spy on President Trump.
How about restricting the Fourth to allow police to search those they believe are carrying a gun, such as more stop and frisk, where there is not enough probable cause to search or get a warrant? If the person is not legally allowed to possess guns, then this would remove guns from the street.
Restricting the First Amendment to eliminate or severely reducing violence in movies/shows would lead to a reduction in violence.
Restricting the Fourth Amendment to allow the police to remove guns from those not legally permitted to own and carry.
The Bill of Rights restricts the government from limiting our natural, God-given rights. The Bill of Rights does not grant us rights, it assumes we have these rights and limits the government’s power to limit our rights. The Democrats view the Second Amendment as a right given to us by the government that the government can take away or restrict to such an extent the right does not exist.
Of course I do not favor restricting the First or Fourth. I make these proposals only to show that the Democrats are not serious about reducing crime and are hypocrites who simply hate that Americans can lawfully own guns to protect themselves
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA