The 2024 film “Civil War,” directed by Alex Garland, offers a dystopian glimpse into a near-future America torn apart by internal conflict. Through the eyes of a group of journalists, the movie explores the rapid psychological transformation that occurs when citizens are thrust into violent opposition against their former friends and neighbors. In drawing parallels to real-world events like the Rwandan genocide and the Bosnian War, Garland’s film serves as a harrowing reminder of how quickly societal bonds can dissolve under the pressures of propaganda, political division, and violence. Historically and psychologically, “Civil War” raises important questions about the fragility of human decency when pushed to the brink of survival.
Historically, “Civil War” mirrors the chilling events in Rwanda and Bosnia, where entire communities turned against each other in the span of months. The film’s portrayal of American citizens suddenly viewing their former classmates as enemies echoes how, in Rwanda, neighbors were incited to murder by ethnic hatred fueled by extremist propaganda. Similarly, in Bosnia, once-peaceful towns became battlegrounds where friends and neighbors fought along ethnic lines. Garland’s film, like these tragic historical events, shows how rapidly fear, misinformation, and propaganda can erode the social fabric, turning ordinary people into agents of destruction.
Psychologically, the film delves into the mental deterioration that occurs when individuals are forced into violent conflict. The characters in “Civil War,” many of whom start as ordinary citizens, gradually succumb to a mindset that justifies extreme actions in the name of survival. This mental shift—where people dehumanize others and justify violence—is a well-documented phenomenon in wartime. In both Rwanda and Bosnia, citizens were manipulated into believing that those they once shared their lives with were now existential threats, pushing them into committing atrocities. Garland’s film captures this terrifying psychological transformation, highlighting the ease with which humans can abandon empathy when faced with existential threats.
At the heart of “Civil War” is the question of identity and moral responsibility. The film’s characters, particularly the journalists, serve as both witnesses and participants in the moral collapse of society. Their internal struggle reflects the broader societal conflict—should they remain neutral observers, or do they have a moral obligation to take sides? This mirrors the historical dilemmas faced by international observers during the genocides in Rwanda and Bosnia, where many questioned whether their role was to document atrocities or intervene to stop them. The film uses this moral ambiguity to highlight the difficulty of maintaining one’s humanity in the face of overwhelming violence.
In conclusion, “Civil War” is a film that transcends its dystopian setting to offer a haunting exploration of human nature under extreme stress. By drawing from historical examples of societal breakdowns, such as Rwanda and Bosnia, it reminds us of the psychological fragility of civility and the ease with which ordinary people can be turned into perpetrators of violence. Garland’s film serves as a warning, showing how quickly a society can descend into chaos, and how important it is to understand the psychological and historical factors that fuel such transformations.
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA