I Read Every Declassified File From July 16th. Here Is What They Actually Say — And Where I Have To Correct My Own Side.
On the evening of July 16, 2026, the President of the United States addressed the nation from the White House and announced the immediate declassification of intelligence covering five areas of American election security. NBC declined to carry it live. ABC declined to carry it live. NBC News NOW ran it on a streaming channel and promised a special report afterward, which is the television equivalent of telling your wife you will get to the garage this weekend.
Part 1 of this series covered Tranche One and Two.
Part 2 covered Tranche Three, Four and Five.
We pick it up here in Part 3 at Tranche Six.
— TRANCHE SIX: THE 278,000. AND WHERE THE NUMBER CAME FROM. —
The DHS statement is one page. Its headline, in capitals in the original: over 250,000 non-citizens are illegally registered to vote in just the four states for which public data files have been reviewed. Those states: California, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Nevada. All four have been notified. The investigation is expanding.
And separately: as of June 22, 2026, 25 different states processed more than 68 million registration records through the SAVE system. DHS enabled those states to identify over 400,000 deceased registrants and over 28,000 non-citizens who illegally registered to vote.
Now do the arithmetic that nobody on television did.
250,000 plus 28,000 equals 278,000.
That is where the President’s number came from. He added the two DHS figures together. It reconciles exactly. And unlike the 220 million, this one is defensible on its face — though I would say out loud that combining a four-state file review with a 25-state SAVE match is comparing two different instruments, and a science teacher would ask you to show your units.
Four hundred thousand dead people on the rolls, by the way. That is not an estimate from a guy in a basement. That is the Department of Homeland Security’s number, produced by states VOLUNTARILY running their own rolls through a federal system. Texas alone reportedly turned up 111,000 deceased registrants.
Ten states have processed their FULL voter rolls. Georgia, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, North Carolina, Idaho, Alabama, Missouri, Louisiana, Kansas. Notice anything about that list? Now notice which four states DHS had to review from public files, because those four would not participate.
And then this, from the DHS statement itself: due to the actions of Judge Sparkle Sooknanan, many of the enhancements to the SAVE service have been suspended pending appeal.
There it is. A federal district judge switched off the tool that states were using, voluntarily, for free, to find dead people and non-citizens on their own rolls.
Quinn’s Law Number Twenty-Three: liberals love the law right up until they do not agree with it, and then they simply do not obey it. And its close cousin, Number Twenty-Two: liberals love democracy unless it does not go their way. When a bipartisan set of states — including Louisiana and Kansas and, yes, Georgia under Kemp and Raffensperger — voluntarily cleans its rolls, the response is not “great, let us all do that.” The response is a lawsuit and an injunction.
NOW THE CAVEATS, AND THEY ARE REAL.
That DHS page is a POLICY STATEMENT. Not intelligence. Not a court finding. It is the lowest evidentiary tier in the entire dossier. It provides no methodology, no error rate, no independent verification. It names no individuals — there is no list, anywhere in this collection, of a single specific person illegally registered to vote.
And history matters here: prior “non-citizens on the rolls” figures from various states have included data-matching errors. Naturalized citizens flagged as non-citizens. It has happened before, more than once, and it caused real harm to real Americans who had done everything right.
The 278,000 might be accurate. It might be partly accurate. It might be inflated by matching error. The document does not let you tell which, and anybody who tells you it does has not read it.
The page also carries an overt partisan frame — it uses phrases like “the horrific damage done by the open border policies of the Biden administration” and “alien-first policies instead of American-first policies.” I happen to agree with the sentiment. That is not the point. The point is that the moment DHS put campaign language on an evidentiary document, DHS made its own numbers easier to dismiss. Every hostile reader now has a reason to stop reading at the adjectives.
Do the work or do not do it. But do not do the work and then staple a bumper sticker to it.
Verdict on Tranche Six: SUSTAINED AS AN AGENCY CLAIM. NOT SUSTAINED AS AN ESTABLISHED FACT. The arithmetic is honest. The methodology is invisible.
— THE VENEZUELA SECTION. WHERE I HAVE TO TELL MY OWN SIDE TO STAND DOWN. —
This is the part of the article where I lose followers. Let us go anyway.
The CIA Note dated June 29, 2026, declassified by Director Ratcliffe on July 1, 2026, covers select intelligence reporting from 2004 to 2020 on Venezuela’s electronic voting manipulation capabilities. Its own cover explicitly labels it a CIA perspective, NOT COORDINATED WITHIN THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.
What it establishes, and this is real: Venezuelan government officials developed sustained interest and likely some capability in manipulating electronic voting systems, including Smartmatic technology, to influence electoral outcomes IN VENEZUELA.
The 2006 U.S. assessment found that Smartmatic’s acquisition of the American voting systems company Sequoia posed a MODERATE THREAT to U.S. national security. That finding led to CFIUS pressure, which resulted in Smartmatic DIVESTING its ownership of Sequoia in 2007. So the concern was legitimate enough that the United States government forced a sale. That is not nothing.
Regarding 2012: reporting described plans to manipulate results using preprogrammed machines, deploying altered units to approximately 300 voting centers, to ensure victory by roughly 1.5 million votes. Chávez won by approximately 1.6 million. Sources reported he congratulated his team for successfully implementing the plan.
And in March 2018, Smartmatic ceased operations in Venezuela after PUBLICLY ACCUSING the Maduro regime of inflating turnout by over one million votes in the August 2017 National Constituent Assembly election. The company blew the whistle on the regime.
Now the parts that were in the same document, on the same pages, that I have not seen quoted once on my timeline.
Number one, and it is dispositive: the 2006 Intelligence Community assessment concluded that NEITHER SMARTMATIC NOR THE VENEZUELAN GOVERNMENT HAD THE CAPABILITY — meaning the level of control or access required — TO MANIPULATE THE OUTCOME OF AN ELECTION OUTSIDE OF VENEZUELA in a predictable fashion. The reason is spelled out: Venezuela’s domestic ability rested on controlling EVERY STAGE of the electronic voting process. Neither Smartmatic nor the regime would have that complete spectrum of access during an electoral process outside Venezuela.
Number two: CIA’s baseline assessment regarding Venezuela’s 2012 election maintained that LARGE-SCALE ELECTRONIC FRAUD DID NOT OCCUR, despite the reporting of manipulation plans. That conclusion was supported by pre-election polling, the opposition’s own concession, and CIA quantitative analysis showing no irregular voting patterns.
Number three: the 2013 Devil’s Advocacy Report that laid out a plausible fraud scenario was EXPLICITLY AN ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS EXERCISE. A red-team drill. Not a finding.
And the September 2020 technique — the one involving a second set of virtual machines replicating legitimate results and substituting manipulated data — comes with its own caveat in the same memo: the IC judged the regime did not need to resort to gross fraud to win the December 2020 National Assembly elections, because virtually the entire opposition BOYCOTTED.
So here is where we are.
If you are out there today posting that the CIA just confirmed Smartmatic rigged American elections, you are wrong. Not shaded. Not spun. WRONG. The document you are citing says the exact opposite, in a paragraph the memo itself flags as its first and most important limitation, and it says so because the analysts wanted to make sure nobody did what you just did.
The honest version is still worth having: a company with documented ties to a hostile regime that was actively interested in electronic vote manipulation owned a piece of the American voting infrastructure, and our own government considered that a moderate national security threat and forced a divestiture. That is a supply chain problem. It is a real one. It is worth a hearing.
It is not a stolen election. And if you insist on making it one, you will hand the other side a clean, easy, deserved win — and every other thing in this article, the machines and the barcodes and the 91 fictional people and the massaged PDB, will get thrown out with it.
Quinn’s Law Number Five says that when liberalism conflicts with reality, reality must give way. I did not spend twenty-three years in the Army and twenty years in a classroom to turn around and do the same thing in the other direction. Reality does not give way for me either. That is the whole deal. That is the ONLY thing that makes any of this worth reading.
— WHERE I WAS RIGHT. THE RECEIPTS. —
I do not do victory laps often. Tonight I am taking one lap, and then I am going to take a much more uncomfortable one right after, so hold your fire.
In “Is There Voter Fraud in Fulton County? Here Is What Bski Knows” — February 24, 2026 — I wrote that recounting invalid ballots does not make them valid, that certifying improperly documented votes does not make them legal, and that a UC Berkeley statistician had described Fulton County’s recount as potentially little more than security theater. I argued that chain of custody and post-election auditing were the whole ballgame.
The CISA report released July 16 recommends: use human-readable paper ballots, and conduct post-election MANUAL audits of paper ballots to identify errors PRIOR TO CERTIFICATION. That is my article, written by the federal cybersecurity agency, eighteen months later, at taxpayer expense.
In “A Senator Vows to DIE Stopping Voter ID. I Read the FBI Affidavit. Let’s Talk,” I wrote about 19,000 counterfeit Chinese-manufactured driver’s licenses seized in a single Chicago shipment whose barcodes actually worked, and I said that a fake ID with a working barcode is not functionally a fake ID at all. That thread appears in the released FBI material as a live investigative lead with agents identifying China-based senders. It also appears with CBP’s assessment that most were for underage drinking, which I have now put in this article against my own interest, because I said I would follow the evidence and that is what following the evidence looks like on a bad day.
In “WHO EXACTLY IS AFRAID OF KNOWING WHO VOTED? A Response to the Left’s Meltdown Over Trump’s Election Integrity Executive Order” — April 2, 2026 — I wrote that THE REACTION IS THE CONFESSION. That if your stated goal is protecting voting rights, and someone proposes a system that makes every verified citizen’s vote more traceable and less susceptible to cancellation by a fraudulent ballot, you should welcome it. I also wrote that the SAVE program under 42 U.S.C. 1320b-7 had been used for decades to verify citizenship for federal benefits and that applying it to elections was a logical extension.
DHS has now published the SAVE results. Twenty-five states. Sixty-eight million records. Four hundred thousand dead registrants. And a federal judge switched off the enhancements. The reaction was, in fact, the confession.
In “Battlefield America,” Chapter Two — “They Are Stealing Your Vote” — I made the case that the entire problem is broken identity infrastructure, and I proposed the American Citizen Card Act, the AMIGO Act, and I pointed out that Mexico has required a free biometric voter credential with ten fingerprints since the 1990s and is now rolling out iris scanning, and that calling the same standard racist when applied in America requires intellectual gymnastics I do not possess.
The July 2026 voter registration database report now says, in the government’s own words: the real threat is WHAT CAN BE DONE WITH THE STOLEN DATA. And that data obtained in a breach from 2021 could be used to request a ballot in 2028, BECAUSE THE DATA DOES NOT GET STALE. That is the argument for a biometric credential, written by the federal government, four months after I made it at my kitchen table for free.
That same report also establishes what I have been saying for a year: hackers have attempted to breach voter registration systems in ALL FIFTY STATES, with confirmed successes in AT LEAST TWENTY. In 2016 Russian actors accessed voter registration files from a U.S. county website in at least two instances, stole information on approximately 500,000 voters from a state board of elections, and hacked a vendor that supplied voter verification software. In July 2016 a bad actor in Riverside County, California used the state’s own registration website to CHANGE THE PARTY AFFILIATION of a large number of registered voters. In March 2017, Kennesaw State University — which supported Georgia’s voter database — exposed nearly SEVEN MILLION voter records including driver’s license and Social Security numbers. In September 2020, Iranian IRGC members successfully obtained voter registration data in at least one state and targeted eleven others.
And my personal favorite, from 2023 — New Hampshire selected a vendor to replace its voter database, and the vendor had offshored part of the project. The software was configured to connect to SERVERS IN RUSSIA, and a programmer had hard-coded the UKRAINIAN NATIONAL ANTHEM into the database. Someone caught it before deployment. Someone almost did not.
That is the system. That is the actual system. Somebody nearly shipped a voter database that phoned home to Moscow and played a patriotic tune on the way.
In “Congress Warned Us in 1963. We Did Not Listen. Now Look at What They Checked Off,” I went through the 45 Communist Goals read into the Congressional Record by Congressman Albert S. Herlong Jr. of Florida on January 10, 1963, Appendix pages A34 and A35, drawn from Cleon Skousen’s The Naked Communist. I flagged Goal 20 — infiltrate the press, get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions. And Goal 21 — gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
On July 16, 2026, NBC and ABC decided the American people did not need to see a presidential address about foreign compromise of their election infrastructure. Live.
I am not going to say the goal was achieved. I am going to say the outcome matches the goal, and I am going to let you decide what to do with that, exactly as I did in that article.
And in “HOW TO TAKE OVER A NATION,” I walked through Alinsky’s Rule 5 — ridicule is man’s most potent weapon, and it is almost impossible to counterattack — and explained that the point of ridicule is that you never have to defeat the argument. You only have to make the person radioactive.
For six years, every person who asked about barcodes on ballot marking devices was made radioactive.
The barcodes were real. Halderman testified about them in federal court in 2021. CISA put it in writing in 2026.
— WHERE I WAS WRONG. AND THIS ONE MATTERS MORE. —
I told you I would do this. Here it is.
I have written, in more than one place, in a tone considerably more confident than the evidence justified, that the picture adds up to a stolen election. I have used the phrase “when the data does not match, you investigate” — which is correct — and I have let it carry an implication it should not have carried, which is that the investigation has already come back.
It has not. And I am done letting the implication ride.
The coordinated intelligence says altering tabulation at scale would be DIFFICULT and that post-election audits and paper trails VERY LIKELY WOULD UNCOVER such an effort — a safeguard now required in 38 states. The IC’s coordinated consensus was that Beijing did not intend to try to affect the election and has not deployed influence efforts intended to change the outcome. The Michigan case was registration fraud, declined, with no established fake votes. The Albany report was recalled garbage. The Venezuela memo says the capability does not reach outside Venezuela.
And there is one more line in the January 2020 memo that I think is the single most important sentence in this entire release, and it cuts directly at me:
Adversaries could make FALSE CLAIMS about their ability to manipulate U.S. election infrastructure. They could announce a wholly fabricated compromise, and it would be difficult, time-consuming, or IMPOSSIBLE for the U.S. Government to disprove. And a widely publicized compromise probably would undercut public confidence in the election EVEN IF THE COMPROMISE WAS NOT USED TO MANIPULATE ANYTHING.
The IC wrote that down in January 2020, ten months before the election, as a prediction.
It came true.
That is the trap, and I have had a foot in it. Real vulnerability plus real breach plus real registration fraud plus real cover-up fight does not equal proven stolen election. It equals a system that is INDEFENSIBLE AND UNAUDITABLE, in which nobody — not me, not you, not Brad Raffensperger, not the New York Times — can prove very much of anything either way.
That is the actual crime. They built a system where the question cannot be answered, and then they punished you for asking it.
I am not going to let Moscow and Beijing use my own outrage as a delivery vehicle. If they want the American people to lose faith in the count, they do not need to change a single vote. They just need us to do it for them. For free. In all caps. At two in the morning.
I have made calls under fire where the math worked out perfectly and the outcome still replays at 2 a.m. in rooms that are supposed to feel safe. I know exactly what it costs to be wrong. I would rather eat this in front of you today than defend an overreach for the next five years.
— THE PART WHERE EVERYONE, INCLUDING THE PRESS SECRETARY, KEEPS SAYING “OUR DEMOCRACY” —
In the pre-speech remarks, the White House Press Secretary described secure elections as a vital part of “our democracy — of our constitutional republic.” Two out of two. She caught it on the fly and corrected herself mid-sentence, and I am giving her full credit, because that is more than I get out of most of the people who went to law school.
For everyone else who spent the evening saying “our democracy” like a nervous tic: the word “democracy” appears in the Constitution exactly ZERO times. The word “republic” appears once — Article IV, Section 4, guaranteeing to every state in this Union a Republican Form of Government. Madison distinguished in Federalist No. 10 between a pure democracy, where citizens assemble and administer government in person, and a republic, where they act through representatives. He warned that democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention, and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.
This is not pedantry. It is the whole reason this story exists. A pure democracy has one safeguard: the count. A republic has structure, checks, and federalism specifically so that no single point of failure — including the count — brings the whole thing down.
And your teachers got it wrong, which is why you have it wrong, which is not your fault. Teachers pass along what they were taught. That is how you ended up believing there is no gravity in space, that blood is blue until it hits air, that Einstein failed math, that you only use 10 percent of your brain, and that chameleons change color to camouflage. All false. All confidently taught. All still repeated by adults with degrees.
“Our democracy” is on that list. It just has better PR.
While we are in the founding documents: Hamilton, Federalist No. 68, on the design of presidential selection. He wrote that the deadliest adversaries of republican government would make their approaches chiefly from the desire in FOREIGN POWERS to gain an improper ascendant in our councils — and asked how they could better gratify that desire than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union. The entire mechanism was built to guard against cabal, intrigue, and CORRUPTION FROM FOREIGN POWERS.
Two hundred and thirty-eight years ago, Hamilton sat down and wrote that foreign interference in the selection of an American president was the specific threat the structure existed to defeat.
And in 2020, four hostile nations had the documented capability to reach into the machinery, one of them was buying our voter files off a website, and the response of the United States government was to have an internal argument about whether the word “election” should appear in a paragraph.
Hamilton, Federalist No. 59, on why the national government must retain authority over the elections of its own members: every government ought to contain in itself the means of its own preservation. He argued that leaving federal elections entirely to the states would leave the national government’s very existence at the mercy of those state governments.
That is the SAVE Act argument. Written in 1788. By a man who never saw a barcode.
— WHILE WE ARE ON THE SUBJECT OF THINGS THE GOVERNMENT KNOWS AND WILL NOT ACT ON —
Since we are discussing a Department of Justice that sat on an FBI Laboratory handwriting report for months and a Congress that is about to hold hearings on all of this:
The Major Richard Star Act — H.R. 2102 — has been scored by the Congressional Budget Office at roughly $975 million per year. That is approximately $9.75 billion over ten years, to stop the federal government from taking earned retirement pay away from about 54,000 COMBAT-WOUNDED, MEDICALLY RETIRED veterans, dollar for dollar, because their careers were cut short by injuries they received carrying out orders.
I am one of them. I get a statement every year showing what I earned in retirement, and then showing what I actually collect. Which is zero.
Tonya Star — the widow of Major Richard Star, the man the bill is named for — died still fighting for it.
There is a discharge petition, H.Res. 1247, sitting right now, that would force it to the floor. Members who CO-SPONSORED the bill have not signed the petition. Call them. Tell them you know they co-sponsored H.R. 2102 and that it is time to honor that signature by signing H.Res. 1247. All talk, no action has a shelf life.
We can find the resources to declassify five tranches of documents and hold a primetime address. We can find $924.7 billion for a defense bill. We cannot find $975 million a year to stop stealing from the guys who got hit.
I will get off that particular horse now. But I will get back on it Monday.
— THE JOKE —
A man dies and goes to heaven. God tells him he gets one question, answered truthfully, no hedging.
The man has been waiting his whole life for this. He asks: was the 2020 election stolen?
God says: no. The votes were counted essentially as cast. What actually happened is that four hostile nations had the capability, one of them bought your voter files off a commercial website, your own agencies had a knife fight over whether to tell anyone, an NSA analyst wrote down that a Presidential Daily Brief was deliberately massaged, an FBI report was recalled five times over because it contradicted the Director’s testimony to Congress, and the Justice Department buried a registration fraud case for four years because interviewing witnesses might have LOOKED bad. Then everybody involved went on television and told your countrymen it was the most secure election in American history, and called them lunatics for asking.
And the man, staggered, says: my God. So there was no conspiracy at all.
And God says: son, that IS the conspiracy. You were just looking at the wrong end of it.
— WHAT ACTUALLY NEEDS TO HAPPEN —
A good lesson does not end at “here is the problem.” It ends at “here is a testable solution.” So.
ONE. Pass the SAVE Act. H.R. 22. Documentary proof of citizenship to REGISTER — once, not every time you vote. REAL ID, passport, military ID with service records, tribal document, or birth certificate with photo ID. Section 2(f) already handles the married-name objection; the authors solved it before anyone raised it. It passed the House. The Senate blocked it. Seventy-six percent of Black Americans, eighty percent of Hispanic Americans, and eighty percent of white Americans support proof of citizenship to vote. The Carter-Baker Commission — bipartisan, commissioned by Jimmy Carter in 2005 — listed voter ID as its number one recommendation.
TWO. Restore the SAVE system enhancements. Twenty-five states used them voluntarily and found 400,000 dead registrants. A single district judge should not be able to switch that off while 200 million voter files sit on a server in China.
THREE. Kill the certification rule that forbids patching known vulnerabilities in the months before an election. That is not a partisan issue. That is a rule that a reasonable person, reading it out loud, would assume was a typo.
FOUR. Human-readable paper ballots and mandatory pre-certification manual audits, everywhere. Not because I think the machines flipped 2020 — I have just spent this entire article explaining that the evidence does not establish that. Because the ONLY reason we are having this fight at all is that the system cannot answer the question. Build a system that can answer the question and the question stops being interesting. That is the whole point. An auditable election is the single most effective counter-disinformation weapon in existence, and it costs less than one B-2 wing.
FIVE. The American Citizen Card Act, as laid out in Battlefield America. One free federal biometric credential at 14. Because the government’s own July 2026 report says the stolen data does not get stale, which means the 2028 attack surface was purchased in 2022 and is sitting in a data center right now, waiting.
SIX. And for the Republicans in the room, since apparently nobody read it the first time — the Constitutional Firearms Access Act is still written and still sitting there. If identification requirements are discriminatory barriers to constitutional rights, then background checks, NICS, and waiting periods all have to go, because every one of them demands ID. Either identification requirements are a discriminatory barrier to a constitutional right or they are not. The Bill of Rights does not come with a “pick your favorite” option. Pass the SAVE Act, or pass that one. Democrats already made the argument for you. I already wrote the bill for you. You have no excuse.
— THE BOTTOM LINE —
Here is what I know, stated as simply as I can state it.
Four hostile nations had the documented capability to reach into American election systems, and our government knew it in January 2020. More than 200 million voter files — including a database flagging which of us are veterans — are in the hands of the People’s Republic of China, and a chunk of it was legally purchased off a commercial website. Election officials invited a federal agency in and that agency took full network control of their systems within hours. Ballot marking devices encoded your vote in a barcode you could not read and a researcher proved the barcode could be changed remotely. Certification rules forbid patching known holes before an election. An NSA analyst wrote down that a Presidential Daily Brief was deliberately massaged to avoid an elections link. A report was recalled and the stated reason, five separate times in one file, was that it contradicted the FBI Director’s testimony to Congress. Ninety-one out of one hundred and seven voter registration applications in Muskegon, Michigan belonged to human beings who do not exist, and one of them lived in a park, and the Justice Department slow-walked it for four years and then wrote the paperwork to make the kill look like the agent’s own idea. And DHS says a quarter million non-citizens and four hundred thousand dead people are on the rolls, and a judge turned off the tool the states were using to find them.
And what the record does NOT show — and I will say it as loudly as I said all of the above — is that anybody changed the count.
Both of those paragraphs are true. Anyone who will only tell you one of them is selling you something.
The system is not defensible. It is not auditable. It cannot answer the most basic question a self-governing people can ask, which is: who voted, and were they allowed to?
That is not a conspiracy theory. That is a lab report where the instrument was never calibrated, the controls were never run, the raw data was purchased by a foreign government, and the technician who raised his hand got sent back to his desk twice — and wrote it down both times.
When the data does not match, you do not change the data. You investigate the methodology.
We have been arguing about the data for six years.
Try the methodology.
IF THIS ARTICLE MADE YOU THINK:
LIKE this article so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it. SHARE this — every share really helps get the word out. Use it. COMMENT below with your take. Of the six tranches, which one should Congress subpoena FIRST — the massaged PDB emails, the five-times-repeated Wray justification, or the four-year Muskegon slow-roll? And tell me straight: did I go too soft on Venezuela, or did I finally get it right? Tell me.
And if you want MORE of this — the data, the history, the science, the stories — JOIN Bski’s Classroom community or follow me on YouTube. Even better, subscribe to my account; it is about the cost of a cup of coffee per month. That is it. Your support keeps this classroom open, and I promise I will never run out of material as long as the left keeps trying to out-dumb itself.
But what do I know — I am only a medically retired Army combat medic who spent 23 years learning that the difference between a clean operation and a catastrophic one is chain of custody, a science teacher who has failed students for arranging the evidence around the conclusion, and a guy in Northeast Ohio who actually downloaded all six tranches at midnight and read the paragraphs that hurt his own argument out loud before he wrote a single word.
Mike Borowski is a medically retired Army combat medic with 23 years of service, including a combat deployment to Iraq, and a high school Anatomy and Physics teacher at a high-need Career Technical district in Northeast Ohio — where he also wrote and published the textbooks for both courses. He runs “Bski’s Classroom,” a platform dedicated to cutting through political noise with data, history, and the kind of blunt honesty that comes from someone who has seen both war and the American classroom up close.
X (Twitter): x.com/BskiMike22802
Substack: substack.com/@bskimike22802
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@BskiMike22802
AFNN: https://afnn.us/author/mikeborowski/
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA