Renewing Constitutional Integrity: Advancing Frequent Impeachment for All Offices

In a republic built upon the bedrock of the Constitution, accountability and unwavering fidelity to the rule of law are cornerstones of governance. As staunch constitutional originalists, our duty extends beyond mere preservation – it encompasses the adaptation of the Founders’ intent to the modern era. This article asserts that the intrinsic essence of the binding oath of office and the Founders’ comprehensive understanding of misdemeanors warrant a more vigorous embrace of impeachment. Beyond that, it argues that judicial activism constitutes a breach of the oath, rendering it an impeachable offense. By championing frequent impeachment for both elected and unelected offices and addressing the issue of judicial activism, we not only honor the Constitution’s core tenets but ensure their enduring relevance.

The Sacred Oath: Pledging Allegiance to the Constitution

Our Founders’ acute recognition of the binding oath of office reflects their profound understanding of the weight it carries. This oath, transcending rhetoric, signifies a binding contract between officials and the Constitution. Elected and unelected alike pledge to defend and uphold the Constitution. By committing to the Constitution, officials pledge fidelity to its principles and in turn, fidelity to the American people. Embracing frequent impeachment serves as a reminder that this oath is not just ceremonial – it is a guiding light that demands compliance and enforces accountability. Without a credible threat of impeachment, the oath of office is not binding, as the Constitution requires. It is just ceremonial.

Misdemeanors: A Fuller Grasp of Infractions

The term “misdemeanor” in the context of impeachment is not confined to the modern understanding of criminal offenses. When the Constitution was written, “misdemeanor” referred to misconduct, misbehavior, or even abuse of power, regardless of whether it met the threshold of a criminal offense. This broader interpretation, intended to hold public officials accountable for their actions, aligns with the Constitution’s spirit and its goal of preventing misuse of authority.

Accountability for Elected Offices: Rekindling Integrity

Elected officials, as the representatives of the people, bear an immense responsibility. Yet, when elected officials violate their oath by pursuing personal agendas or partisan interests, the essence of their office is compromised. Frequent impeachment, judiciously employed, serves as a beacon that guides elected officials back to the path of constitutional fidelity. This process reinvigorates the notion that the people’s interests must stand paramount, fostering a culture of trust and transparent governance.

Upholding Constitutional Values in Unelected Offices

The realm of unelected offices is no less significant. Officials appointed or employed in these roles bear the duty to remain aligned with the Constitution’s principles. Frequent impeachment, informed by the Founders’ understanding of misdemeanors, safeguards against misuse of authority. It reinforces the principle that those entrusted with power are accountable for their actions, regardless of their method of entry into office.

Addressing Judicial Activism: A Breach of the Oath

Judicial activism poses a unique challenge to the sanctity of the Constitution. When judges indulge in legislating from the bench, they breach their oath. They are meant to interpret, not rewrite, the law. By allowing personal bias to dictate decisions, they undermine the impartiality required of their role. Judicial activism defies the Constitution’s principles and thus constitutes a misdemeanor in the original sense. Consequently, impeachment becomes a necessary recourse to restore the judiciary’s integrity and fidelity to the Constitution.

Conclusion

As ardent constitutional originalists, our role extends beyond interpretation; it encompasses preservation and adaptation. By advocating for frequent impeachment, grounded in the binding oath and the Founders’ conception of misdemeanors, we propel our republic forward. Through this commitment, we instill accountability, transparency, and unwavering dedication to constitutional principles in all offices, whether elected or unelected. Moreover, by recognizing judicial activism as a violation of the oath, we assert the need to protect the judiciary’s sanctity. This comprehensive approach fortifies our republic, ensuring its endurance as a bastion of justice, liberty, and allegiance to the fundamental values upon which our nation was forged

If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.

Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA

 

Leave a Comment