The Unconstitutional Army Social Justice Warrior and a DEI Jobs Program

If you’re a Veteran you swore an Oath to defend the Constitution of the US. Article I, Section 8, Clause 12 of the United States Constitution delineates a crucial limitation on the duration of funding for the Army. This constitutional provision stipulates that while Congress holds the power to “raise and support Armies,” any allocation of funds for this purpose cannot extend beyond a maximum term of two years. In essence, this clause mandates that appropriations for military endeavors must be regularly revisited and reauthorized by Congress within a biennial timeframe.

This restriction on the tenure of military appropriations is a deliberate safeguard embedded within the Constitution to preserve the fundamental principle of civilian control over the armed forces. The Founding Fathers, deeply aware of the historical dangers associated with standing armies and centralized military power, sought to curtail the potential threats posed by an unchecked and perpetual military establishment. Today known as the Military Industrial Complex. By limiting the funding period to two years, they intended to ensure consistent congressional oversight, preventing the entrenchment of a permanent, autonomous military force divorced from civilian authority.

This constitutional provision serves as a testament to the Founders’ wisdom in structuring a system of governance that prioritizes the democratic principle of accountability. It reflects their astute understanding of the risks inherent in allowing unchecked, long-term funding for military purposes, which might undermine the balance of power and erode the foundations of a free society.

In essence, the two-year limitation on military appropriations embodies a foundational element of the nation’s governance, reaffirming the necessity for regular legislative review and authorization, thereby reinforcing the principle of civilian supremacy over the armed forces. It stands as a constitutional bulwark against the consolidation of unchecked military might, echoing the Founders’ commitment to preserving liberty through the careful separation and oversight of powers within the government.

In his farewell address to the nation on January 17, 1961, President Dwight D. Eisenhower issued a profound warning about the growing influence and potential dangers posed by the “military-industrial complex.” He cautioned against the undue influence of the alliance between the military establishment and the defense industry on the nation’s policies and priorities.

Eisenhower, a former five-star general during World War II, recognized the necessity of a strong national defense but expressed concern about the unchecked growth of the military-industrial complex. He warned that the collaboration between the armed forces, defense contractors, and the government could lead to an excessive buildup of armaments and a perpetual state of preparation for war. This continuous expansion, he feared, could skew national priorities, divert resources away from vital domestic needs, and threaten the balance between military and civilian interests.

The Pentagon seems to overlook both the Constitution and Eisenhower’s wisdom, steering away from these critical insights. Despite being the most well-funded globally ($1B a year) our military has transformed into a DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) jobs program for the woke. What’s worse is some American youth don’t think this Nation is worth defending. These Social Justice warriors in uniform render modern Army efficacy a mockery. We will lose the next war.

If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.

Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA