The great global awakening: playing the Money Ball Game is about bringing back common sense, which ain’t so common anymore. Not in America, and not around the world.
Part 1 strolled down a bit of memory lane to revisit some of the malfeasance in plain sight, collusion, illegalities and lies foisted upon We the People by a government all too interested in playing reindeer games without regard to the cost.
These events were all in the 21st century, which is off to a doozy start that is going to be hard to top in the scant ~75 years left to challenge it: but never underestimate our government’s ability to wreak havoc in the face of fair winds and following seas!
I only covered up to the period before the Trump years but that period-by any measure one would care to use-included enough malfeasance in less than a quarter century to indict American leadership from stem to stern, right down to the local level.
Which begs a question, if a representative government is the high-water mark standard for governance, then how come our representative government is not the high-water mark standard for governance?
Many if not most of the examples I used in part 1 were government. None of them would have been as effective (that means bad) without the other elements of the collusion choir-the LSMBTGA-singing the doo wops, adding harmony, carrying water, amplifying narratives-setting the proverbial hook whenever necessary: prostituting themselves to curry favor.
Neither would it have worked without the collusion between the LSMBTGA and federal government censorship activity regime that came into being in the aftermath of an effort to totally propagandize America and the world about people, news and events by institutionalizing the process.
I don’t want to repeat my previous-some might say dogmatic-windage laden articles on this topic, but it-the censorship collusion train-really gained steam through the nefarious teaming of these elements as almost a criminal syndicate against Donald Trump and his supporters (see the Joe Rogan Podcast article, Replacement Theory, Stasi State, Cultural Lunancy, and a very long Global Folly series that was started so long ago much of it timed off our site…)
There have been numerous seemingly compromising acts by those in the LSMBTGA who have embarrassed themselves bigly in the recent decade. Guilty of fawning coverage of the powers that be, carrying water when and where necessary, repeating lies to spread the manure around, creating whole cloth conspiracy theories and nonsense against their enemies to support their friends, etc., etc., rinse and repeat.
Many of these supposed “news” organizations-including CNN, with LSMBTGA poster child Acosta departing the stable, NBC, MSNBC, and CNBC, as well as continuing degradation of print media in this country are undergoing transformations that come from a loss of confidence by viewers and readers that can’t be denied any longer, defined by loss of add revenue that comes from hemorrhaging viewers.
With the sale of Twitter to Musk which begat “X,” the tide started turning wherein acolytes such as Michael Rapaport-perhaps the most famous epiphany-wokester-in America-became introspective over the cacophony of ridiculous narratives-and somehow awoke from his stupor to call it out!
Others who have undergone seemingly transformational “180s” that included outreaches to the “Bad Orange Man” include folks like “Morning Joe,” Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerbucks” and others. We can debate as to exactly why, but me thinks it is reality in a small place and the concept of survival of the fittest: if you can’t beat them, join them…
This Politico article is surprisingly frank while staying snarky in acknowledging the magnitude of Trump’s victory and how it should be viewed in terms of his place in history and the last four years of increasingly delusional democrat policy that finally met its inevitable fate dashing on the rocks during election 2024.
Which seems like the spark of hope and optimism that common sense is going to prevail in our politics going forward. But just about the time it seemed to be getting safe to go back into the proverbial LSMBTGA water, as evidenced by some of the above examples and the response of voters to the first week of activity and policy, fresh signs emerged that call into question the LSMBTGA writ large judgement and capability to take the “L.”
Some government agencies thought it smart and cute to salvage their DIE programs and personnel by renaming programs, positions and personnel to play “hide the potato” and to “cutesy time” (which, if you haven’t heard, is over (Dan Bongino)) their non-compliance.
One of the worst and most public idjiotic responses was perpetrated by the United States Air Force, who thought it would be clever to fight back by apparently eliminating training and education coursework associated with the Tuskegee Airmen and the Women Air Force Service Pilots (WASP.)
For those not familiar with their stories, this was during a time of segregation and very limited participation from the standpoint of access for blacks and woman. The merit-based excellence of these soldiers had absolutely nothing to do with anything but merit-based performance, demonstrated skill and opportunity.
Many have labeled this USAF leadership act a case of malicious compliance, a technique that has often been used in the military to teach inept leaders life lessons on how the military-which is run by non-commissioned officers-actually works day-to day.
For instance, a section whose cohesion and esprit is challenged by an inept leader who does not learn from mistakes nor take advice of more experienced soldiers, may learn the hard way that you should not just tell soldiers to “go to the motor pool.” When the task is actually to accomplish motor stables and preventive maintenance checks & services (PMCS.)
There might come a time when that leader shows up for the battalion commander’s inspection to find that no work has been done: but the troops did report to the motor pool as directed….
The LSMBTGA continues to fight the bit as evidenced by this atrocious reporting by Politico that includes references to supposed lies about “Venezuelan migrants” in Aurora, Colorado. As is the norm for these turd drops, the article totally ignores the actual facts that dispute the happy face comments of the Colorado governor Mr. Potato Head Polis. Here is another one.
The problem is the Venezuelan gang called Tren de Aragua that took over apartments in Aurora and were recently raided to begin their removal from the country. Colorado officials knew about this problem as early as November 2023 but failed to take action because of “soft on illegals” policy.
The above really came to national prominence when J.D. Vance had an epic exchange where the LSMBTGA was dismissing the story as overblown: common sense and money ball. If there is no problem with Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua taking over apartments, how come we are talking about Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua taking over apartments?
Here is another one that is just a classic self-own, the product of continually getting away with misleading their often information deficient readers. Sean Craig reports that New York Magazine thought they could get away with “racist,” and “white supremacist” laden claims about the inauguration balls.
But they are so eaten up with that military malady called dumb schift disease that they actually chose to highlight perhaps the most ludicrous choice imaginable, a ball sponsored by Republican Youth Advisory Council co-chair CJ Pearson, who hosted the event that was profiled. And-yes-he happens to be black-and the ”rag” had to crop he and several others out of their picture else it would have debunked their narrative of a “racist” ball.
The government is a whole nother story, a big place full of people who are full of themselves. Whose leaders are most often out of touch with the workforce, as evidenced by yearly Employee Climate Surveys (ECS) that often reveal worse leadership ratings than local volunteers with no skill or experience or expectations.
The government takes these vehicles-like the ECS-seriously, working with those “dinged” by the results to shore up deficient areas. Which sounds like goodness, but I would judge the government approach more from the renaming of the process to Employee Viewpoint Surveys, than anything else.
Seemingly adopting the “viewpoint” that is often a bedrock of DIE, CRT, ESG and Unconscious Bias (what I call conscious racism) propaganda that perception, bias and lack of and miscommunication is more often the challenge than bad leaders.
The actual problem can be admittedly any and all of these, but you rarely see failure to perform issues because of bias and racism: not in the government. There are too many checks and balances, but that is not to say incidents don’t happen.
My view was distinctly tainted by my third iteration of an Unconscious Bias Class taught by an overtly militant and proud of it black female instructor who spouted myriad nonsense ideas about the “patriarchy, white privilege, whites being born with racism that can’t be cured,” and the final straw of disavowing MLK’s dream of a colorblind society where people are judged by the “content of their character and not the color of their skin.” A notion blithely dismissed by the statement that it “pisses me off when you don’t see me as a black woman…”
Most senior government leaders with few exceptions are hand selected by agency leadership and you can imagine how little some of these surveys can mean in the greater view of “schtuff.”
The fact that I only know of a few examples where leaders were dismissed or removed as a result of such surveys is somewhat indicting of the process, when you consider that true malfeasance, fraud waste and abuse is often directly exposed in these efforts.
What am I talking about? We had a supervisor at the Dep Dir level of a business unit who had colluded to bring several of our contracted secretaries or admins into the government. On one of the first ECS’ filled out by their section, so likely one of them, there was a write-in comment about “not appreciating being pressured to do favors for the boss.”
Members of the panel I was on that were charged with working to disposition any ECS related issues or problems in our business unit, insisted this was most likely an innocent comment that we should not take out of context: I was not only 180 out from that viewpoint, but I believed it came from one of the girls who had been brought into government by this “miscreant.”
We did nothing about it, no conversations with the section associated with the ECS, no general discussions, no follow-up whatsoever. About two years later the same boss (that I suspected) was caught by our security force-in person-as well as captured on security video in one of our conference rooms doing the “whammer jammer” with one of the aforementioned admins.
He was protected by leadership and rotated to an assignment outside of our building. Our agency Dep Dir actually lectured a group of us not to discuss this incident unless we had personal knowledge that we had witnessed ourselves, else we be subject to an EEO complaint! A few of us were indignant, but my question was about what qualified as personal knowledge, would it be-for instance-the security video tape???
Finally, here is the type of issue percolating here in our local area where aptitude tests indicate problematic academic achievement results in many school districts while costs keep going up for education. The issue of flying political flags in classrooms should be either a cut and dry case-there are none-or it is open season for flags in the classroom based on teacher and student beliefs (causes.)
In this case the school via the superintendent should set the policy-regardless of which of those two is chosen. What I don’t understand is how a decision can be made to support the flying of only two flags-declare them non-political-and expect that to settle the issue. Whether it supports their “DIE” objective or not.
The return of common sense to our government is long overdue and has been sorely missed for decades. The same goes for the entirety of the LSMBTGA.
Making inroads on some of these issues that seem cut and dry is a start. But if you don’t want controversy over flying flags, then why are you causing controversy by flying flags? And never the Stars and Stripes…
30 January 2025
LSMBTGA: Lamestream media echo chamber (LMEC-L) social media (SM) big tech tyrants (BT,) government (G) and academia (A)
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA
4 thoughts on “The Great Global Awakening: Playing The Money Ball Game Part 2”