Black Lives Matter, Just Not to Democrat Politicians (Part III, War on Poverty and Welfare State)

(AP Photo)
In 1960, 22 percent of black children were in single-parent households. In 1985, 67 were in that condition. By 2015, the number had grown to 77 percent. What happened? Simple. President Lyndon Bains Johnson and his self-styled, “Unconditional War On Poverty.”

In 1964, while delivering his annual State of the Union Address to Congress, President Johnson proposed a far-reaching series of social programs, declaring

Our aim is not only to relieve the symptom of poverty, but to cure it and, above all, to prevent it.”

This “War on Poverty, “ was kicked off by an act of Congress known as the Economic Opportunity Act. This legislation encompassed not only transfer payments but also housing and other programs, over 40 in all. The monetary cost? According to a 2014 Heritage Foundation article, we’ve spent over 22 Trillion Dollars, since 1964.

So, how have we done? Have we achieved President Johnson’s goals? An October of 2018 article in the Wall Street Journal entitled: Government Can’t Rescue the Poor, answers that question succinctly. From the article

The stated goal of the War on Poverty is not just to raise living standards, but also to make America’s poor more self-sufficient and to bring them into the mainstream of the economy. In that effort the war has been an abject failure, increasing dependency and largely severing the bottom fifth of earners from the rewards and responsibilities of work.

Over at the Heritage Foundation in an article 4 years earlier, Robert Rector, who Heritage bills as, “a leading authority on poverty, welfare programs and immigration in America,”notes

The actual living conditions of households labeled as poor by Census are surprising to most people. According to the government’s own surveys, 80 percent of poor households have air conditioning; nearly two-thirds have cable or satellite television; half have a personal computer; 40 percent have a wide-screen HDTV. Three-quarters own a car or truck; nearly a third has two or more vehicles.

Read: The War on Poverty: 50 years of failure

As I initially noted, President Johnson’s goal was to make poor people self-sufficient. According to Rector, President Johnson failed miserably.

The exact opposite happened. For a decade and a half before the War on Poverty began, self-sufficiency in American improved dramatically. But for the last 45 years, there has been no improvement at all. Many groups are less capable of self-support today than when Johnson’s war started.

Over at the CATO Institute, Michael Tanner says pretty much the same thing (emphasis mine).

The War on Poverty has failed to make those living in poverty independent or increase economic mobility among the poor and children. We may have made the lives of the poor less uncomfortable, but we have failed to truly lift people out of poverty.

Read: The War on Poverty after Fifty Years

After 22 Trillion Dollars, which is pretty much the entire National Debt, we should be getting far better results. What happened?

Back to Robert Rector who points out the obvious

The culprit is, in part, the welfare system itself, which discourages work and penalizes marriage. When the War on Poverty began, 7 percent of American children were born outside marriage. Today the number is 41 percent. The collapse of marriage is the main cause of child poverty today.

He goes on (again, emphasis mine) to deliver the money quote

The welfare state is self-perpetuating. By undermining the social norms necessary for self-reliance, welfare creates a need for even greater assistance in the future.

Got that? As in so many cases, the leftist “solution” actually exacerbates and perpetuates the problem. Robert Rector notes that the collapse of marriage had an outsized impact on poverty. To most Americans, this would seem to be a blinding flash of the obvious. Next in this series, the actual mechanics of how the welfare state has destroyed millions of Black families and the resulting aftermath

Links below become active as each segment is published.

Black Lives Matter, Just Not to Democrat Politicians (Part I)

Black Lives Matter, Just Not to Democrat Politicians (Part II, Minimum Wage and Union Vote Buying)

Black Lives Matter, Just Not to Democrat Politicians (Part III, War on Poverty and Welfare State)

Black Lives Matter, Just Not To Democrat Politicians: (Part IV, Fatherlessness, Poverty and Crime)

Black Lives Matter, Just Not to Democrat Politicians: Part V, (Eugenics, Planned Parenthood and Margaret Sanger)

Black Lives Matter, Just Not to Democrat Politicians: Part VI, (Militant Feminism)

Black Lives Matter, Just Not to Democrat Politicians: Part VII, (Conclusion, Life Is What Matters)

 

If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.

Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA

2 thoughts on “Black Lives Matter, Just Not to Democrat Politicians (Part III, War on Poverty and Welfare State)”

  1. Using his own words as testimony against him, LBJ admitted that his goal was to extort votes from blacks by using welfare. His goal was never about freeing blacks from poverty, but forming another, more insidious form of slavery. I’m sure LBJ didn’t want some of his more candid conversations to get out to the public. “We’re going to have those ni##a’s voting for us for hundreds of years!”
    When one is a narcotic abuser, he slowly kills himself off by the same mechanism as what LBJ started. He used his approach to only extract votes to continue to hold a grip over them.
    The phony “lover of minorities” LBJ, already had his roots established in racial politics, for the express use of stripping the liberty and express love of Christianity by a once strong and growing black community, who after the Civil War had much stronger nuclear families and better character and work ethics than many white communities, because they had to fix their own problems that no government could. Then came a jealous LBJ and decided he would use greed and covetousness to bring the blacks around to his way of thinking, which was only to control their destiny.
    Look in any slum for the results of the legacy of Lyndon Baines Johnson. One might consider LBJ the predecessor of someone like Kenneth Copeland, only in the business of false evangelizing to blacks, in order to extort their place away from them in the supposed eyes of God. LBJ was an evil and wicked man.
    He was also pivotal in the change from the old style of liberalism to the new radical leftist Democrat. And he did it all in the name of doing good for blacks.
    Some legacy! Great Society

  2. Our ruling elites just took a step toward arresting the collapse of marriage, didn’t they? The Respect for Marriage Act will result in more couples tying the knot, but not necessarily producing children. Maybe all those same-sex couples can have kids instead.

Leave a Comment