Performance Art: The Dems Indict Themselves On Their Lack Of Moral Clarity (Again) Part 2

by

Making A Case Through Hypotheticals, False Narratives And Insinuations Is Cowardly And Leftist

I went there and said it. I personally consider the comments in the video done by these stooges to be crassly political and therefore cowardly and un/anti-American. Socialist, leftist, and un-American. And they know better, given their experience, backgrounds and positions.

You don’t have to agree. We still live in a free country. The land of the free and the home of the brave. Opinions are like elbows, and you know what’s. Everybody has them and has the freedom to express them and bask in the glory of their acknowledged genius or be shamed in turn by the shallowness of their thoughts.

Some of us have not lived up to the above description, supporting government sponsored censorship of “the other guy,” whose viewpoints you might disagree with-as if we don’t celebrate our first amendment rights which are expressly intended to protect speech we might otherwise totally disagree with. Our government and the entirety of the LSMBTGA in recent years acted upon and scurrilously shut down speech they disagreed with or wanted to suppress for political motives throughout the bulk of this century.

Going so far as to spy upon, commit lawfare against, censor through litigation and actions of government agencies, as well as the entirety of the LSMBTGA like some Stasi State operation, not only their actual political enemies, but perceived enemies and often their own constituents they are legally bound to support as the duty of their elected office.

Our government went after our government-the senate and the house-facilitated by the court system-in a manner that would do any Stasi State-like operation proud. As if the shoe might never be on the other foot someday. Many of my somewhat former friends and colleagues look puzzled when this topic is mentioned, not quite the “deer in the headlights” look but more bemused, befuddled and seemingly unaware of the topic. The canard of conspiracy theory malady.

Mike Benz and Mark Andreeson forewarned and discussed this issue in detail. But the somewhat ultimate reference on this matter is the Media Research Center report, The Biden Administration Waged War On Free Speech: With 57 censorship examples.

An extract from the report intro tells you all you need to know about this President Biden effort:

The Biden administration’s censorship efforts ran the gamut from coercing and colluding with Big Tech platforms to silence his opponents; using taxpayer dollars to fund censorship organizations that pledged to cancel conservative voices; enlisting foreign agents to suppress stories from right-leaning media outlets; and weaponizing federal agencies to target those critical of the administration. This report details 57 distinct Biden initiatives that targeted Americans’ ability to speak their minds. The degree and extent of this coordination is dizzying, spanning no fewer than 90 different government agencies, entangling hundreds of government officials and including thousands of individual censorship actions. The number of people silenced, or prevented from receiving messages they wanted to hear, is all but incalculable. The harm to the nation’s constitutional framework and the system of limited government is similarly beyond measure.

Not to be dogmatic about it but this occurred in America in the 21st century perpetrated by our government. An effort that was resoundingly met with silence and support by a majority of citizens who should know better: but apparently didn’t.

Whether driven by politics, ignorance, complicity-whatever-the result was a descendance into the darkness of the classic Stasi State that lorded over eastern Europe as the “Iron or black curtain” smothered free speech in eastern Europe in the 20th century.

The video by the so-called “seditious 6” is no different and much worse than many of the government actions because of their positions and the potential confusion and ambiguity fomented on those whose jobs entail following orders under the crucible of missions that require immediacy and clarity of judgement and action. The topic is the military but federal agents and police officers across this nation face dynamic situations where response times can make the difference between life and death.

The last thing you want to introduce into these situations is artificial ambiguity or confusion resulting from largely political considerations. It is not fair to the leaders, the responders, the people they strive to serve or the victims.

We are entitled to our own opinions on these matters-obviously-but you owe it to yourself to have an informed opinion based upon facts and not some political opinion contrived from the color of your ballot or the story dictated by your politics.

I take a military view on this because of experience that includes some ~80 years of government service in our immediate family that spans militarily from WWII to Korea to Vietnam to the Gulf War(s) and recent GWOT actions in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as civilian service spanning the post-9-11 GWOT era up through Ukraine.

Which is nothing more than relative life experiences where such things greatly matter. Anybody who has leadership experience, whether military command or some level of government civil service dictated by position knows how important it is to keep people focused on the mission and not distracted by miscellaneous “rumor mill” type distractions such have been introduced with this video and much of the scurrilous commentary and behavior by politicians on these matters.

It would be different if there was evidence certain of some illegality that has occurred: that is not the case and each of these numbskulls has agreed it so. Only recently has a specific allegation been put forth by one of the six. However, those allegations were accompanied by statements that confirmed that Sen Kelly lacked any “facts.” What does that make him?

Do we want our politicians-congress-or leaders-making allegations, insinuations, clever tortuous accusations, without facts?

If there was an action to re-engage a legitimate military target because the mission was not complete, e.g., the target was still able to move, shoot, or communicate-to continue the trafficking action that the mission was undertaken to interdict and terminate-there is nothing remotely untoward or illegal about such actions.

Sometimes in the heat of battle and the fog of war circumstances-and the actions of the engaged-get fuzzy or might cross lines that people sitting in the comfort of their own homes might be disturbed by.

The bottom-line is there is nothing wrong with reviewing these actions and confirming what happened. Not the preferred narrative supporting some political motive, but the facts about what happened.

We should do so in consideration of the many hoaxes that have been drummed up and debunked during “Trump time” where the propensity has been to loudly cast aspersions up front with little to no charity or thought or common sense and to backfill that bullspit with embarrassing silence and mystery when the story is debunked: often long after the damage is done.

It cracks me up when someone looks puzzled or has that surprised, “What do you mean?” look on their face in regard to hoaxes. Stu Cvrk published a recent article on the ongoing Color Revolution in America that has a pretty decent run down of perpetrated, debunked hoaxes of late. I liken this list to Wiley Coyote and his cocksure attitude about getting that pesky Roadrunner, not unlike Charlie Brown and Lucy with the football. The list follows-and despite its length (and girth) it is unsurprisingly not complete: there are scads of them…

My favorite might be the whipping illegals hoax. Or maybe the Obama “we do not pay ransoms for hostages” hoax: he-we-did. Although honorable mention must go to the “Trump was raided because of nuclear secrets” blather that was never followed up on. Or the media frenzy and LSMBTGA hysterics in his first term to push for witnesses when he met with Putin because he was a “Russian puppet.”

There is nothing worse in a leadership, command or military climate than the introduction or insinuation of ambiguity and doubt related to ongoing missions directed at subordinates, thereby undermining leadership and the chain of command: nothing worse. Whether it stems from ill-considered thoughts, opinions and sham casual direction from congress, or irresponsible commentary and politically motivated ideas or outright seditious views from the LSMBTGA, any effort that targets the individual taking action in these matters by questioning the legitimacy of the officers and leaders appointed over them is by definition, seditious activity.

Many will explain this away as nothing unusual, nothing to see here. This is the damage Trump Derangement Syndrome and full-throated opposition has engendered in our government and society. Where it has become common place for our government to deem it okay to go after the previous government on an unprecedented scale that undid nearly 250 years of precedent.

These views or memories of convenience with regard to these rights are outrageous, as if someday violations of our first amendment won’t seek out and find them in the crosshairs or in the mirror.

Many supposed learned people did that and celebrated that, and many took pleasure when some have been killed-assassinated-most recently Charlie Kirk-for doing nothing other than expressing views and opinions in celebration of such freedoms. A result and cause that I believe happened because of the dogmatic hate signaling and violent rhetoric of the left and politicians of all stripes.

I look at a local map of registered sex crime offenders-pedophiles-living in and around us. In a civil society we don’t have militia or vigilantes hunting these people down to take some perception of justice into their own hands like what categorizes other countries. It would be un-American to do such a thing, not unlike what many celebrate in Kirk’s assassination or in many other cases where the general public seems inordinately unsympathetic to public murders of many different varieties (insurance CEO murdered, football player killed at event, Soldiers ambushed in DC, DC Uber-Eats crime.)

I can’t help but believe the worst of any who propagate such nonsense or express opinions supporting such actions. They certainly have a right to their opinion, viewpoint and beliefs. Just as much of a right as those who express contrarian opinions or who criticize and condemn such views.

You have an absolute right to dress as, describe, or present yourself as whatever animal, mineral, gender or fruit-whatever-you want to portray. And I have the same right to debunk and disavow those views, actions and beliefs-to declare nonsense-and to call you out or disagree to go along with them.

When it is politicians in general, or specifically our elected officials and representatives, the level reached by such violations is actionable and must be called out and remediated through censure, sanction or recall.

The video in question is just the most recent example of ignorant politicians-who must know better given their stature in our government and as supposed defenders of the very constitution they swore an oath to-or contrarily and concomitantly who disqualify themselves through their words, deeds, and actions-who must face the music for falling short of their obligations to their constituents (American taxpayers.) 

Max Dribbler

Maxdribbler77@gmail.com

4 December 2025

LSMBTGA: Lamestream media echo chamber (LMEC-L) social media (SM) big tech tyrants (BT,) government (G) and academia (A)

If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.

Substack: AmericanFreeNewsNetworkSubstack
TruthSocial:@AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA

Post Views: 98

Leave a Comment