Once upon a time, in the blissful simplicity of Eden, God gave Adam a straightforward task: name the animals. And Adam, being a practical man (and let’s be honest, not yet bogged down by bureaucracy), did exactly that. Cow. Dog. Bird. Done. Efficient. Understandable. But then, centuries later, humanity—never one to leave well enough alone—decided that calling things by simple names wasn’t confusing enough. Enter scientific nomenclature, the linguistic labyrinth where even the most common creatures sound like they belong in a Harry Potter spellbook.
Take the humble white-tailed deer. You probably know it as, well, a white-tailed deer. But science insists it must be Odocoileus virginianus, a name so unnecessarily complicated that even if you managed to pronounce it correctly, no one would have a clue what you were talking about. Try saying the last part in a classroom full of 7th grade boys…Try this at your next backyard barbecue: “Saw an Odocoileus virginianus out by the feeder this morning.” Enjoy the blank stares before someone asks if you’re having a stroke.
And it’s not just deer. Bears? Ursus americanus. Eagles? Haliaeetus leucocephalus. Raccoons? Procyon lotor—which sounds more like an off-brand Italian pasta than the trash panda raiding your garbage can. At some point, humanity collectively decided that Adam’s names were too accessible, and we needed an elitist, Latin-based code only decipherable by scientists and really annoying birdwatchers.
This, of course, is the same culture that prides itself on dumbing down everything else. We shortened “hamburger” to “burger,” “telephone” to “phone,” and “sneakers” to “sneaks,” yet somehow we demand that someone trying to discuss a simple frog must refer to it as Lithobates catesbeianus—because apparently, just saying “bullfrog” is too pedestrian. Heaven forbid we just communicate like normal people.
The truth is, despite the existence of these ridiculous scientific names, nobody actually uses them. Walk into any hunting lodge, pet store, or kindergarten classroom, and you won’t hear a single person referring to a cat as Felis catus. Not even veterinarians take this nonsense seriously. The Latin is just there to make scientists feel superior while the rest of us continue living in reality, where “squirrel” is a perfectly acceptable term for Sciurus carolinensis.
So, in summary, Adam got it right. The rest of us, not so much. We had one job—just keep the names simple—and we failed spectacularly. And if that isn’t the perfect metaphor for human civilization, I don’t know what is
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA