Citizen Writers Fighting Censorship by Helping Americans Understand Issues Affecting the Republic.
It’s only Wednesday, and two more federal judges have decided to join the resistance — making a mockery of their oaths to stop the chief executive from performing his Article II duties. But are judges effectively blocking his every move, or playing into his hands?
At what point will lost trust, turn into lost consent, and what will that look like?
I proudly consider myself a right-wing extremist and I recently discovered an issue on which I agree with two of the most “let’s take over everything” radicals in the Democrat party. James Carville, Elizabeth Warren, and I find ourselves in total agreement that Chief Justice John Roberts is a putz.
Are honesty and knowledge of the game’s rules essential attributes for a baseball umpire? How about for someone whose decisions affect the life and liberty of another human being?
Pretend defender of the Constitution (A.K.A. Chief Justice Roberts) is not big on neatness. In fact, he’s made a real mess of his room in this house we call our constitutional republic. You see Johnny is more concerned about the public’s perception of his court, than fidelity to the Constitution.
I hope our dedicated public servants in black robes occupying the building with “Equal Justice Under Law” laughably inscribed on the front, are cancelling their summer vacations. They’ve been shirking their chores since 2017, and now they need to get the courts under control again.
The Dems said that if we elected Donald Trump our democracy would be a risk … and they were right. Since we had the temerity to elect the Donald, the left’s rogue judges have decided that it’s their sacred duty to rescue us from the calamity of self-governance.