Citizen Writers Fighting Censorship by Helping Americans Understand Issues Affecting the Republic.
It’s only Wednesday, and two more federal judges have decided to join the resistance — making a mockery of their oaths to stop the chief executive from performing his Article II duties. But are judges effectively blocking his every move, or playing into his hands?
I proudly consider myself a right-wing extremist and I recently discovered an issue on which I agree with two of the most “let’s take over everything” radicals in the Democrat party. James Carville, Elizabeth Warren, and I find ourselves in total agreement that Chief Justice John Roberts is a putz.
Are honesty and knowledge of the game’s rules essential attributes for a baseball umpire? How about for someone whose decisions affect the life and liberty of another human being?
Pretend defender of the Constitution (A.K.A. Chief Justice Roberts) is not big on neatness. In fact, he’s made a real mess of his room in this house we call our constitutional republic. You see Johnny is more concerned about the public’s perception of his court, than fidelity to the Constitution.
I hope our dedicated public servants in black robes occupying the building with “Equal Justice Under Law” laughably inscribed on the front, are cancelling their summer vacations. They’ve been shirking their chores since 2017, and now they need to get the courts under control again.
On Tuesday, the Washington Post reported that President Joe Biden is weighing major reforms to the Supreme Court that include a proposal to introduce term limits for the justices and an “enforceable ethics code.” This plan is especially ironic given that our 81-year-old president, who is undeniably senile, is hellbent on running for a second …
In a 6-3 decision, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the subsection used to round up and prosecute Trump voters is tethered to the subsection that addresses tampering with a record, document, or object.
Has the Supreme Court noticed that we’ve crossed a legal Rubicon? The Constitution – that thing the Court is supposed to defend – is becoming less relevant by the day because the left has decided that our mutual pact of self-governance doesn’t apply to them.
The Supreme Court took the 14th Amendment and smacked Harvard upside the head. The message was clear. Affirmative action will soon be as dead as separate-but-equal.
It’s what they don’t say that matters; Media reports on Supreme Court have the same eerie omissions
The radicals put their thinking caps on and came up with a creative solution to fix the Supreme Court. Just tell President Gremlin to ignore the court. Joe being Joe, he might actually do it.
The final days of the 2022-2023 Term of the United States Supreme Court has largely been satisfying to conservatives with many 6-3 decisions in favor of what the Constitution requires.
Liberal reactions to the high profile decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court this week read like a parody account. On Thursday, the Court dealt a blow to affirmative action by invalidating race-based college admissions programs in favor of a merit-based system and the responses from many on the left were downright racist. Rev. Al Sharpton …
It was 2003 when the Supreme Court released its decision in Grutter v Bollinger, 539 U. S. ____ (2003), in which a bare majority allowed the University of Michigan Law School to continue to consider race in its admissions decisions. Associate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor concluded, in something we have cited previously: We take the …
A clock that’s only right twice a day can not be used as a timepiece, and a DOJ that only pursues crimes committed by Republicans does not deliver justice.
Ben Franklin famously said, “You’ve got a republic, if you can keep it.” That warning is particularly haunting now, because we seem on the verge of losing it – not from foreign invasion – not from revolution – but because we stopped caring about it.
What happens when the constitution is ignored rather than respected? In that case it will cease being a guarantee of our rights or a constraint on government overreach. That will be a true Constitutional crisis.
If Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s questioning of North Carolina Solicitor General Ryan Park, who is defending the University of North Carolina’s use of affirmative action in their admissions decisions, had been a chess game, I’m pretty sure the jurist would have announced, ‘Checkmate.’ Like a tiger toying with a kitten, Alito very efficiently struck what …
The final days of the 2021 Term of the United States Supreme Court greatly pleased conservatives of all stripes. One unifying theme found through the 4 largely 6-3 decisions are not just that the lefties are big mad and super upset about the outcomes, but the Court is returning to the constitution’s history, text and …
The world is overheating, and now we know why. It all started when the Supreme Court had a big week. Sure, it made a few consequential decisions, but its real accomplishment was how much it agitated the Dems.