Not just our gun laws, but any country’s gun laws. If you look at a chart of countries in the world, compare their gun laws to the crime, or the tyranny present, you will see a strong correlation between tyranny, totalitarianism rising or falling with the severity of those laws. You can look at extremes to see the picture, but when you look at the not so extremes, it adds some color to the picture, as well. And it isn’t just Australia. Too often, the details are skewed to the subjective views of the ones compiling those lists, but even their work, when viewed by objective eyes, their data suggests that the gun is not the problem, and the gun laws don’t prevent what they may claim
One example is Brazil. Under their current president, Jair Bolsonaro, gun laws have been made more lenient, and a real shocker has come to be exposed. Brazil has had a problem with crime, just like we have, and guess what? It fell. When Brazil eased up on who could own a firearm, crime fell! Not only did it fall, but it was by a large margin. Does that give you an idea of who gun laws really protect? It sure narrows it down who that is. Now, with just one example of an easing of gun laws, you can see that it now is that the gun laws were there to protect one or both of the following: the government, or the criminal. There is never a reason to make a law that punishes an individual, to the point that he has to rely on someone else to “protect” him. I’d rather have my options more open than to carry around a cop on my back. I’m too old to be doing that. And cops can’t do much more than clean up the aftermath. I respect them because I respect the laws, but what about those who don’t? Get’s a little tricky, there, doesn’t it?
Since the National Firearms Act of 1934, just who benefited from that law. Was it the people? Was it the government? Was it the black, who the left has tried every which way under the sun from owning a tool to protect his hard earned freedom after the Civil War? The only beneficiary of the NFA was the government. The black deserved all along, the right to protect himself and his family from tyranny, as much as anyone else in this country, and one of the reasons the NFA was passed was to keep blacks from owning firearms, not just to make it illegal to own a machine gun.
And the government knew that their newly formed creation of a law was unconstitutional to the core, so they came up with a burdensome tax scheme to do the equivalent. Who did that directly affect the most? Everyone, including the black, who could not afford that $200 tax, which I still think is too heavy a burden. Without that fundamental right, you couldn’t defend yourself, just like me. That’s no political statement, but it is a statement about individual freedom, and that should be preserved for “ALL”, not just a select few or some stupid group of pompous bigots. There is still time for you and I to change course and right the wrongs of the government. It is still a burden on you and I, equally, and it should never have happened. We can fix that together. America didn’t start slavery, but it sure as heck ended it. That’s a dark road no one deserves to go down, ever again. Our government is in the process of making us all slaves. We need to be vigilant and protect that right, not let it destroy us.
The main problem with those gun laws, here, and around the world, is that there is a master and a slave relationship budding every time a gun law is passed, because he who holds the power(the gun, the whip, the power to rule over the people) gets drunk with that power. Look how it played out in Germany, during the rise of an evil dictator. It was Jews then, but it can be anyone, any time a gun law is passed. Could you own a gun in the Soviet Union? How about Communist China? Add up the numbers of corpses they piled up, because the people in those countries had/have no right to defend themselves. It is already illegal for a criminal to possess a firearm, of any kind, including a starter pistol(GCA,1968), right now, so it has to be the government that wants you to be powerless. The 20th century was a blueprint for the future of totalitarianism. Do we really want that? No!
I’m optimistic that the NFA will be ruled as unconstitutional, sometime in the near future, so maybe we will do like Jair Bolsonaro did, and take care of that real problem that governments should be looking at, and keeping guns out of the criminals hands, and leaving the rest of us the heck alone. when it boils down to governments being fearful of citizens owning firearms, I’m goo with that, if that is what it takes to get good governments, but you have to shove it in their faces, because they sure don’t care about giving it up on their own. Bolsonaro is not scared of the people in his country. He shows that he is of his people.
If a government is so scared that you might turn against them, that means you have a corrupt and all too powerful government. I know I have said that it is the politicians who need to be faced with the threat of the gun, instead of them threatening us. Look where we let it end up. We would have never gotten to $30 trillion in debt, nor would we have allowed the government to have taken over everything in our lives, had we held on to our fundamental rights, and not allowed the government to steal them in the night, which is what the NFA started. Our government is supposed to be working on our benefit, not theirs. The ATF, the FBI, the IRS, and many more are just drunk with power. And they will be coming for you and I. Ask Alekzandr Solzhenitsyn about those godless communists, who threw him in a gulag to rot, or any Jew who lost a family member because of the Holocaust. Just how safe do you think your money is, in a banking system that will one day have to pay off that debt. They will rob you like the thieves they are. Go and try to withdraw ten grand, just for the sake of it. We pay our taxes, yet they still audit, don’t they? Do you really trust someone who holds a gun at you?
That can all change when we restore our rights under the Constitution and make the government what it is supposed to be, and that starts with getting rid of the government’s monopoly on violence, because it cannot be trusted any longer. Voting is very important, but until we correct tyranny, even voting is questionable.
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
Parler: https://parler.com/AFNNUSA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA
1 thought on “Who Do Gun Laws Really Protect?”