Democrat Federal District Court Judges and one Trump 45 appointee made about 20 nationwide injunctions against the Trump 47 Administration in his first 63 days. They made 64 during his first term. Note the adjective “Democrat.” Because the Judiciary, as the Third Political Branch of Government, is playing politics. They will continue to do so until the Legislative Branch stops them.
If Congress ever finds the courage to constrain judges, they will be accused of “playing politics.” The irony of that accusation is richer than the dessert “death by chocolate” is with chocolate, calories, and sugar.
Get this: Congress is afraid of merely being accused of playing politics to do their Constitutional duty against judges blatantly playing politics. Astonishingly, a few resolutions for impeachment have been offered, but no actual articles of impeachment have come out of the Judiciary Committee. Want to make a bet on whether any do?
The excuse Establishment Republicans give is that the rulings don’t “rise to the level of impeachment.” That was repeated over and over when President Bill Clinton was impeached for lying to a Grand Jury. However, the “other high crimes or misdemeanors” which justify impeachment aren’t limited to the terrible acts imagined by defenders of judicial tyranny.
When the Constitution was written, “High crimes” meant acts committed in high office. Not the crime itself, but the special burden of proper behavior and good governance placed on persons in high places in government. Alexander Hamilton in Federalist 65, specified the “injuries done immediately to society itself” were sufficient political grounds for impeachment.
Impeachment is political, not legal. It has a process and a hearing which make it look judicial, but it is absolutely a political judgment. Just like any judge taking it upon himself to countermand the President and invoke a national-wide ruling is all about politics. The judges are ruling on issues beyond their district. The judges are out of their judiciary.
Malfeasance means doing a job improperly as well as illegally. The judges using lawfare against the Trump Administration commit malfeasance.
Congress can restrict the review authority of judges. That is as straightforward as possible to constrain judicial politics.
Congress can impeach. Congress can de-fund courts. Congress can re-organize or eliminate courts. There are 677 Federal judges in 94 Districts. There are 179 Court of Appeals judges in 13 Courts of Appeals.
These actions would have to pass both the Senate and the House. That won’t happen to today. It’ll never happen if Republicans in the House fail to do their duty and give the voters wedge issues to show why Democrats are out of touch with common sense, let alone the Constitution and the Rule of Law.
Those courts can be revised or even eliminated by Congress.
For example, I wrote some time ago a new court system could address the deportation of the illegal alien invaders:
- Establish and fund a special court system to judge illegal aliens for 7 years. Have it sunset before the end of the second term of the new Republican President. Get the work done before the Left swings back – like they did with Obama or cheats back like they did with Biden.
- Do the math and appropriate accordingly. If the court takes a year to set up and 6 years to judge, and one judge will work 200 days a year to equals 1200 days of review per judge.
- How many cases can be reviewed in a day? Most cases will be no-shows. even if the biometric data and photos which the Department of Homeland Security should have are used to search and contact the illegal border violators.
- If 10 cases can be reviewed each day for 200 days, that is 2,000 a year. Or, 12,000 in six years. If, say, 12m persons are to be judged, then 1000 judges are needed.
Note to Republicans in Congress: No guts, no glory.
Judicial tyranny was bad when SCOTUS sided with the socialists to enforce the New Deal. It has gotten steadily worse since the activism of the Warren Court of the 1950/60s. Abortion was made up out of imagined right to kill babies in the womb. Likewise, sodomy and homosexual marriage were made up by judges who assume the roles of omnipotent priests and kings. These tyrants are black-robed priest-kings.
Judges will go wild until Congress does its duty. Or, the Supreme rules broadly when the injunctions rise to their level. Or, the Executive ignores, disobeys, or creatively goes around the injunctions.
If you enjoyed this article, then please REPOST or SHARE with others; encourage them to follow AFNN. If you’d like to become a citizen contributor for AFNN, contact us at managingeditor@afnn.us Help keep us ad-free by donating here.
Substack: American Free News Network Substack
Truth Social: @AFNN_USA
Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/afnnusa
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/2_-GAzcXmIRjODNh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AfnnUsa
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/AFNN_USA
CloutHub: @AFNN_USA
1 thought on “Judges Gone Wild”