Philadelphia Inquirer Columnist Is All Kinds of Sadz That Target Is Dumping DEI

Philadelphia Inquirer, Building

As I look at thinning the herd on some of my subscriptions, I note that I am paying more for The Philadelphia Inquirer than for The New York Times and The Washington Post, both of which are better newspapers. But, not only am I more connected to the City of Brotherly Love, the Inky does provide some unrivaled entertainment!

Why didn’t the press play its “adversarial role” when it came to Joe Biden?

Philadelphia Inquirer, Building

A former President, whom the Democrats and the media and heavily biased prosecutors and even two thwarted assassins tried to kill, politically, legally, and literally, coming back to win the 2024 election is the undeniable man of the year. All of the odds were against him, but he won through nevertheless. Had Mrs Emhoff won, she’d have been the ‘person of the year.’

Revoke the media’s License to Lie; 32 days until our real president returns to office

60 years ago, the liberal Supreme Court in 1965 gave the press a License to Lie in the NYT v. Sullivan case in which the Times ran a libelous ad by civil rights activists against police in Birmingham, Alabama. The court said, well, unless NYT meant actual malice, the libel was not a libel.

First the pundits reacted to the debate, then the people weighed in, and it made all the difference

Following Tuesday night’s presidential debate, pollster Frank Luntz told talk show host Piers Morgan he thinks former President Donald Trump’s performance will cost him the election. Harsh as Luntz’s assessment of the event was, he wasn’t alone. Wall Street Journal columnist Karl Rove called the debate “catastrophic” for Trump. In fact, it “was a train …

Read more