Using a Decision Analysis Tool to Decide a President in 2024
When faced with the crucial decision of determining the most fitting candidate, here’s a simplified numerical approach that echoes the grading system to evaluate leadership traits
Citizen Writers Fighting Censorship by Helping Americans Understand Issues Affecting the Republic.
When faced with the crucial decision of determining the most fitting candidate, here’s a simplified numerical approach that echoes the grading system to evaluate leadership traits
I don’t talk to myself yet, though I would probably give good advice, but I do think a lot in a day’s time. There’s a big list of “I wonder whys” that never get an answer, because we don’t have a republic anymore.
Having reviewed the numbers for the last 20 years gathered by NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) I can safely say that not only is the world not on fire
As the United States gears up for the next presidential election, it is imperative to focus on essential factors when assessing potential leaders.
We have previously reported that today’s professional journalists rarely deliberately lie to us, but that they often omit rather important parts of the story. This was an Associated Press story, an ostensibly straight news piece, in which the writer managed to omit the most important part of the story. Read on and you’ll see why …
Harvard President Claudine Gay’s ouster from Harvard was because she refused to condemn campus protests that called for the genocide of Jews and more than 50 instances of plagiarism in her woefully marginal academic publication history.
Despite his outspoken advocacy for gun rights, Trump’s tenure witnessed several actions that raised concerns among pro-gun groups.
Evolution of Military Information Operations in the Human Domain: Deception and Psychological Operations by the United States
Unleashing a pandemic panic and race riots across the nation, Obama almost pulled it off. He needed a last-minute mail-in forgery operation to take key states to seal the deal.
The fundamental right to keep and bear arms, enunciated in the Second Amendment, has been a subject of extensive debate and contention throughout history.
The Nuremberg Trials, a series of military tribunals held after World War II from 1945 to 1946, were a landmark event in international law, seeking justice for the unimaginable crimes committed by key Nazi figures.
I delight in knowing that Claudine Gay is now the poster child of affirmative action in which an unqualified person gets the job over a qualified person because of race or sex — or in her case, both.
The narrative of the Tower of Babel from ancient texts harbors intriguing parallels with the vast and multifaceted entity that is the United States government.
After three years of utter chaos when we were promised a return to normalcy, the voters are left with a choice of continuing the chaos or not. Polls show voters favoring the “not” side.
It’s what they don’t say that matters; Media reports on Supreme Court have the same eerie omissions
2 years after being censored via financial coercion of my publisher by big tech, the release of uncensored Jan 6 videos by Tucker Carlson proved me right.
Donald Trump, a figure larger than life and equally adept at self-praise, didn’t just boast; he practically painted a mural of his perceived greatness across various realms.
Attention, readers. Tomorrow is January 6, that day when Democrats and RINOs celebrate what they see as the end of Trumpism.
It really didn’t take all that long for the Usual Suspects to slam former Harvard University President Claudine Gay’s resignation as the result of a vicious campaign by wicked Far-Right Extremists.
The biggest problems with this century are the lies. The media outlets no longer are content with telling just one side of a story. Now they make things up and report on imaginary facts.