Citizen Writers Fighting Censorship by Helping Americans Understand Issues Affecting the Republic.
Most of Wikipedia’s editors are anonymous. How do you sue them? You can’t sue their host Wikipedia – because of Section 230. As lawsuits have proven time and again to be the only tool we have against the legacy forces arrayed against us.
The question is whether Louisiana may herd black voters into two congressional districts and have whites own the four remaining districts. Incredibly, Democrats created this segregation of voters 60 years ago in the Orwellian named Voting Rights Act.
You don’t win a culture war by convincing people anymore. You win it by rewriting the rules so the people don’t get a vote. Welcome to the new War on Guns—where bureaucrats and lawyers do what tyrants once needed armies for
The idea that the court can veto a presidential action is as obnoxious as the idea that a president may veto a court decision.
The Democrats want ICE agents unmasked to have them identified, doxed, and their families threatened. You wonder if they can go any lower?
Google tells Congress it faced Biden-era pressure to police speech — and will let banned creators back House Democrats characterized
The improper application of 3-Strikes laws unnecessarily draws the ire of minority communities for handing out life sentences for minor drug offenses.
Being stopped and asked to show an ID is somehow a violation of the Fourth Amendment in the Crazy World of Tom Nichols. Better to let 40 million illegal aliens invade our country than inconvenience Tom Nichols for a few seconds.
On August 22nd, shortly after 23-year-old (white) Iryna sat down, a 34-year-old career criminal, a violent (black) felon took out his knife and stabbed her in the neck three times from his seat behind her. Of course, she bled out, dying on the train.
It’s only Wednesday, and two more federal judges have decided to join the resistance — making a mockery of their oaths to stop the chief executive from performing his Article II duties. But are judges effectively blocking his every move, or playing into his hands?
In 16 years on the job, SCOTUS Associate Justice Sotomayor has failed to live up to her billing. Her most recent failure was in a dissent on ICE stopping suspected illegal aliens in California.
Remember the $200 tax in 1934? That’s roughly $4,822 today. Imagine being told you have the right to defend yourself, but first, cough up five grand to the government—or don’t even bother. That wasn’t a minor inconvenience; that was a full-blown economic veto on liberty.
Hamilton continues reviewing the Judiciary and goes into greater depth on the issue of the relative jurisdictions of the Federal and State courts.
Hamilton continues his discourse on the nature of the Judiciary in Federalist 81. This paper addresses the very current issue of an activist Judiciary.
Our modern beliefs suppose that the third branch of government has unlimited authority to make pronouncements. But that is not the case nor was it the intent of the Founding Fathers.
After Hamilton’s introduction to the Judiciary in Federalist 78, he digs a bit deeper into the subject here.
The nomination by the President, and the advice and consent role of the Senate, are designed to ensure that only the most qualified people even receive a nomination, let alone be confirmed as Justices.
The Framers decided the best way to choose Ambassadors, Justices and Ministers was for a single person to nominate and a larger group to approve.
At what point will lost trust, turn into lost consent, and what will that look like?
Far Left prosecutors are using “the punishment is in the process” technic to persecute those they don’t like and/or have contrary political views.