The Long March of Cultural Marxism in America
American Cultural Marxism is the step-by-step march through the seven institutions that shape American society, culture, and Civilization.
Citizen Writers Fighting Censorship by Helping Americans Understand Issues Affecting the Republic.
American Cultural Marxism is the step-by-step march through the seven institutions that shape American society, culture, and Civilization.
The Texas Republican party, like the national party, is run by Republicans In Name Only (RINOs). The Lone Star State is giving us hope of knocking some out.
A high school & middle school mob, sent out into the streets by their teachers and school administrators, recently beat up a mother walking her dog who merely asked “what is going on?” Police stood by and watched.
I trust my government the way I trust a chainsaw: useful, powerful, and capable of doing exactly what it’s designed to do—right up until someone slips, panics, or decides to use it for something it was never meant to cut. I support enforcing the law. I support borders. I support order. What I don’t support is pretending that massive, flexible, taxpayer-funded detention infrastructure will remain forever confined to the narrow purpose printed on today’s briefing slides. That’s not patriotism. That’s optimism with a short memory.
So what good is voter identification going to do in a state like Colorado where under my theory nearly one million extra ballots are being mailed out that can then be used to form the basis for inside the tabulation machine shenanigans? I show ID as I vote in person, but the vast majority of Coloradans voted by mail.
What does one do with useful grifters who’ve lost their utility? The Democrats frankenize them. It’s like ostracizing without the pomp and ceremony.
Since its founding in 1829, the Democrat Party has fought against every bill, every program, every idea to improve life for former slaves. Indeed, Democrats have a long history of discrimination against all “non-white” people. The Democrat Party founded the Ku Klux Klan, passed & enforced Jim Crow laws.
Nearly a hundred years ago, Sir Herbert Butterfield sat down and committed the unforgivable sin of telling historians, strategists, and polite academics something they still hate hearing today: war is not a clean system. It is not a spreadsheet problem. It is not solved by better charts, prettier maps, or a PowerPoint deck with the right color palette. War—every war—boils down to frightened human beings trying to reconcile self-preservation, honor, faith, and meaning while other frightened human beings try to kill them.
“Minnesota fraud” is becoming a cliché and part of the American political vernacular. The total amount of fraud being uncovered throughout the welfare and assistance programs administered by the state is almost inconceivable.
York City needs more affordable housing for its residents. Pushing private owners out will only make matters worse
Soon, the Supreme Court is expected to rule on President Trump’s use of IEEPA provisions in the creation of “reciprocal tariffs.” How they rule is at least in part based on a single question: Does the current state of the American economy constitute an “emergency?”
The wars of the future—and increasingly, the wars of the present—will not announce themselves with bombs and bullets. They will arrive as confusion, contradiction, outrage, and exhaustion. You won’t know when they start. You won’t know who started them. You won’t even agree with your neighbors on whether they’re happening at all.
To understand why this matters, you have to strip away the marketing. A CBDC is not “digital cash.” Cash is anonymous, final, and indifferent. A CBDC is programmable, trackable, and conditional. It is issued directly by a central bank, lives on state-controlled rails, and behaves exactly as policy requires it to behave. That makes it extremely attractive to governments that prefer obedience over ambiguity.
Diane explains how the Democrats controlling Washington State have destroyed parental rights vis a vis the public schools, sending the kids out into the streets to scream at nonexistence ICE operations. George discusses his experience with George Soros.
The modern moral argument surrounding immigration often leans heavily on Christian language while quietly discarding Christian wisdom. Appeals to compassion are constant; appeals to discernment are conspicuously absent. The result is a moral bait-and-switch: Christians are told that disagreement with expansive, consequence-free policies is equivalent to cruelty, fear, or hatred—despite Scripture never making such a claim.
What is it about Biden’s “newcomers” when they get behind the wheel of a big rigs? Since they were allowed to break the law when entering America, do they think that they have a RIGHT to ignore traffic laws, not to mention common sense safety procedures?
That was 1967. Vietnam was raging. Cadets were not being groomed for cable news panels or Senate confirmation hearings. They were being prepared for jungles, rice paddies, ambushes, and body counts. Humor, especially gallows humor, wasn’t a problem to be solved—it was a survival mechanism. The name “Fighting Cocks” wasn’t vulgar to them; it was irreverent, aggressive, and just juvenile enough to signal that these were young men who understood they were not being trained for polite society. They were being trained for war.
Moral anger is where the process begins. Unlike ordinary anger, which arises from frustration or injury, moral anger feels virtuous. It carries the intoxicating belief that one’s emotional response is proof of righteousness. When politics is framed as a moral emergency, anger stops being something to manage and becomes something to display. Neurologically, this matters. Moral anger activates threat responses and suppresses reflective thought, which is why it feels urgent, clarifying, and necessary—even when it is wildly oversimplified. Once people believe that being angry is the same as being good, reason no longer stands a chance.
One wonders where does this ridiculosity stop-and will not be shocked-when the NFL wokes further up and lectures us on social issues when they recognize other nationalities in America with their own distinctive national anthems, and start calling the “Star Bangled Banner” the “White National Anthem”
This latest round of revived nonsense over Jim Crow 2.0 is resurrected donkey dung, hysteria laden dogma from half a decade ago. You would think that even a smidgen-a modicum of respect-for their constituents would motivate new thoughts, ideas or tactics from democrat leaders