SCOTUS Ethics
Ethics is described as a followed-belief of moral standards or values where moral is defined as recognizing the distinction between right and wrong and acting thereupon
Citizen Writers Fighting Censorship by Helping Americans Understand Issues Affecting the Republic.
Ethics is described as a followed-belief of moral standards or values where moral is defined as recognizing the distinction between right and wrong and acting thereupon
During the 2016 election campaign a single word, “deplorable,” created the division/animosity we have today. It was Hillery Clinton’s lumping, classifying, labeling – denigrating– not just an opponent or even a party – but half of America because they had different political views.
When an empire dies, it dies like a cloudy day, without a visible moment of sunset.
While wars rage in numerous countries it was comforting to see these talented, law-abiding representatives of different nationalities compete, help each other and honor decorum.
If Joe resigns, Kamala gets an additional and huge boost running as an incumbent President. The boost closest to election might be the deciding factor in a tight race.
Historic, scary, dangerous battles: political, shootings, fires, climate…. Enough already! Time for a break with a nostalgic trip to a simpler and more fun era.
Today’s conservative SCOTUS has been correcting egregious and illegal power plays of the current administration, but the courts do not have enforcement powers, thus governments continue to flagrantly subvert judicial rulings.
Evil originates in the soul (essence, psyche, being).
The Republican party is currently working to establish their platform – what they stand for. Perhaps they will consider America might best be served if Republicans (not in any particular order) vow to: 1) Secure all borders. 2) Honor all SCOTUS decisions. 3) Reverse the Democrat’s “appease” foreign policy. 4) Support politically, financially and …
Then President Barack Obama was heard to quip, “elections have consequences.” He was right.
If government is allowed to restrict the prices of life-saving drugs, will there be any incentive for companies to front the costs for their development?
Rather than divide the nation by Red States versus Blue States, columnist Chuck Klein has a much more interesting proposal.
Hamas has a very well organized and financed U.S. propaganda operation, an operation masquerading as, “college student protests.”
Judges are referees or umpires, whose duties lie in making sure the playing field is level – not to pass judgment.
Beginning in 1979 China tried to control their unwieldy population by curtailing birth rates … and learned a generation later that there were not enough young people to replace/care-for the workers/retirees.
All the rules, statutes, restraining orders, 911 calls, hand to hand combat technics, aerosol spray Mace, run & hide or other pseudo protective measures will never equal the effectiveness of a firearm when faced with an unwarranted and deadly criminal attack.
illegal immigration is a double-edged sword. There are advantages and disadvantages.
If all the guns in the world could somehow be magically removed; the weak, frail and vulnerable would have no way of protecting themselves from the thugs with bats, clubs and knives
There seems to be a rampant and deliberate misinterpretation of Constitutional prohibitions on Government and not to the benefit of. the citizenry.