Citizen Writers Fighting Censorship by Helping Americans Understand Issues Affecting the Republic.
Demonstrations over the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade turned violent in downtown Los Angeles late Friday night. A protester allegedly attacked a police officer with a “makeshift flamethrower.” KTLA-TV reported that Michael Ortiz, 30, was taken into custody where he is expected to be charged with the attempted murder of a police officer. …
What some people refer to as “settled law” isn’t – it’s not “settled,” nor is it “law.”
Although they’ve had nearly two months to absorb the blow of the Supreme Court’s overturn of Roe v. Wade, we knew the left would take the final ruling hard. And they did not disappoint. Progressives immediately took to the streets to protest this violation of their “rights.” Politicians, from President Joe Biden on down, distorted …
Justice Clarence Thomas is in the news again and for all the right reasons. He’s defending our Constitutionally protected rights and angering the right people, libs.
The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on Friday morning in a 6-3 ruling. This decision will return legal authority over abortion to the states. “The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives,” Justice …
A very common Democrat talking point is that most Americans favor some form of reasonable gun control. And it is true that most people do. The problem with that is that we know history. If we start with some reasonable laws about firearms, that don’t actually prevent every single murder using a firearm, the left will immediately proceed to unreasonable limits.
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has failed to meet his legal duty to hire more police officers or to demonstrate why he hasn’t done so. This decision is a big win for a group of eight city residents who sued the mayor and the City Council over the huge spike in crime that …
One of the seven jurors in the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard defamation trial spoke to ABC News’ “Good Morning America” on Thursday. He described the subtle nuances in Heard’s behavior over the course of the six-week trial that convinced them she wasn’t being truthful. Because he wished to remain anonymous, viewers were not shown his face, nor …
Body Cams are a net positive for Law Enforcement…and could be used for other public applications
We don’t have a gun problem. We have a Democrat overpopulation and governance problem.
Once upon a time, the ACLU stood for something. Its official statement was that it stood for the rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights.
A urban fable that’s come up recently, is that being a law enforcement officer (LEO) requires less training than a beautician (although inaccurate, I must agree some states put ridiculous requirements on licensing to cut hair). The implication is that police are undertrained, or worse, untrained. To put it mildly, that is inaccurate. Liberals in …
In a six-minute Wednesday night rant on Fox News’ “Hannity,” Mark Levin, the fiery host of the network’s show “Life, Liberty and Levin,” rightly took aim at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi over her very substantial, but completely unexplored, role in the Jan. 6 Capitol incursion. “Nancy, what did you do on Jan. 6? Can we …
New York City attorneys Colinford Mattis, 34, and Urooj Rahman, 33, were arrested for tossing a Molotov cocktail into a parked police car in Brooklyn on May 30, 2020, during the riots that swept the country following the death of George Floyd at the hands of a white police officer, which had occurred five days …
When the law is no longer equally applied, a person’s future no longer depends on their own behavior, but on the whims of judges, juries, and prosecutors. Where does it end?
Do oaths have any meaning in a society not underpinned by virtue or at least fear of punishment? I, for one, think we need to restore virtue to society.
The left has been wanting to ban firearms, all of them, ever since I can remember.
In Parts I and Part II the concept of qualified immunity was discussed, as was the origin of the doctrine. Also noted was the fact that those who wished to remove this “good faith” protection for police officers in the legislative and judicial branches of government were making no efforts to eliminate the immunity …
In Parts I and II, the concept of qualified immunity was discussed, as was the origin of the doctrine. Also noted was the fact that those who wished to remove this “good faith” protection for police officers in the legislative and judicial branches of government were making no efforts to eliminate the immunity that …
