Grover Cleveland – The Last Originalist President
Grover Cleveland, the 22nd and 24th President of the United States, holds a unique place in history as the last president who adhered to the originalist interpretation of the Constitution.
Citizen Writers Fighting Censorship by Helping Americans Understand Issues Affecting the Republic.
Grover Cleveland, the 22nd and 24th President of the United States, holds a unique place in history as the last president who adhered to the originalist interpretation of the Constitution.
The framers of the Constitution envisioned a system in which the federal government would have clear boundaries to prevent overreach.
Alaska’s position is unique among the several states – but could Alaska go it alone?
Was it a miracle that created the first national government whose sole responsibility was to protect and defend the rights of its citizens?
The Facts Continue to Drip and Dribble Out, but the Government Has Yet to Come Clean
As time has passed, a stark transformation has occurred whereby our federal government no longer safeguards liberty as envisioned by the Founders.
The signing of the United States Constitution in 1787 is a seminal moment in the nation’s history, laying the groundwork for the democratic principles and freedoms that Americans hold dear today.
A cornerstone of our democratic republic lies in the Electoral College, a time-honored system designed by our Founding Fathers to ensure fair and equitable representation for all states.
In a world marked by rapid changes and evolving governance, the preservation of our republic demands proactive efforts to uphold the principles that underpin our nation’s foundation.
This article presents a comprehensive argument, supported by quotations and citations, that only a few of the over 400 federal departments and agencies are constitutionally authorized.
Too many law-enforcement officers, FBI agents included, have demonstrated that they are no longer agents of the Constitution. We need law enforcement to maintain order. But when their oath becomes irrelevant, “order” becomes tyranny.
The radicals put their thinking caps on and came up with a creative solution to fix the Supreme Court. Just tell President Gremlin to ignore the court. Joe being Joe, he might actually do it.
There’s been a lot of hooraw in the news lately about the Biden family’s corrupt dealings, but we shouldn’t forget to pay attention to some of the other perennial heroes of the Left; this time it’s the daffy old Bolshevik from Vermont, Bernie Sanders, he of the three mansions, who is in the crooked-dealings spotlight. …
These States argue for appellate court to uphold Doughty’s Injunction. Verbal arguments related to the appeal will be heard on August 10th, 2023. In a post on 𝕏 made by Tracy Beanz, she reported that conservative States had filed a Brief of Amicus Curiae, voicing their support for the temporary injunction Judge Doughty granted to …
Human rights cannot be cancelled – only suppressed. Our founders understood that suppression of rights causes conflict and unrest not peace and stability.
I usually start my mornings perusing the news of the day. Yesterday, in under 15 minutes, I came across three stories of anti-woke rebellion. Was it just a coincidence, or is the rebellion beginning?
Much of the abuse of power currently exercised by certain branches of law enforcement (i.e. the FBI) was made possible by legislation and the expansion of powers granted immediately following the tragic events of 9/11. It was not a time when socialism seemed to be the prevailing ideology of our governing officials. The executive and …
Bill Barr inherited a very afflicted Department of Justice, in which the cancer had metastasized throughout all of its organs. His DOJ needed disruption, but he allowed it to continue unimpeded on its path of two-tiered justice and violation of the Constitution.
Strengthening Constitutional States is More Important Than Cleaning Up the Swamp-The 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is the Tool to Use
Penumbral reasoning is absurd for contract law, and it’s also absurd for constitutional law. If the words don’t have concrete meanings, the documents they are written on become meaningless.